London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Hey up Sav,
yeah - sorry if i were a lil brusk oer there......
just annoy's me that these crooks driving CGP think they can steal way the co I've invested in - how dare they!!!
hope SOLG with Citi at the helm, don't just give em a bloody nose - but totally do em over - I just feel for the PI's in CGP should it come to that however!
r's!
atvb matey!
bn.c
BN.c nice to see you over on ceo.ca too buddy!
Grimmy - spivs lols
Interesting but hardly surprising NCM not selling. However I don’t necessarily read into it that therefore they must be lining up a bid. Although I’m not ruling it out.
I’m not selling either but I’m not lining up a bid for everyone else’s shares (joke).
RBC probably spent about 2 hours looking into it and said you’d be mad to sell at these prices. Your stake is worth multiple times what you would get. And then charged them millions in consultancy fees for the privilege. NCM could have saved themselves a fortune by hiring me.
No worries :)
Canadian mining mafia / bunch of spivs. Take your choice!
Mornin Grimmy,
Thanks for that.....
Interesting....
The more I look into these shady characters the more I dislike them.........
Here's a piece on Bob Sangha
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/industry-news/the-law-page/dundee-takes-on-high-profile-mining-banker-in-cutthroat-court-battle/article19716946/
We've already had links to Chamandy's shady past posted on here.......
What are these people, shady mining gangsters in suits or what?
R's
BN.c
Morning BNC
A very short-lived post from a new poster (‘F.U.Charmandy’ or something similar) posting an email exchange they allegedly had with brooke charmandy, basically saying ‘if your accusations about SOLG withholding market info is true tell the regulators’ plus a response from charmandy saying ‘it’s true but don’t post this email to a BB or news site’ and the poster inferring they’d shared it with Eliza (no response) and shared it with Canadian regulators.
Clearly has it in for Charmandy, or stirring the pot, or making it up. Posted their supposed (French/Quebecois) email address. Not sure if it was authentic
Interesting times!
Fair point, Quady.
Good morning addicknt, not everyone wants to sue, although I take your point. I would however turn the question around. If CGP have evidence of any wrong doing, why haven't they lodged a complaint, with the regulator, and presented their evidence. You wouldn't call an EGM, as surely withholding information from the regulator, and accusing Solgold publicly is not only unprofessional, but may carry a penalty in itself. Still waiting for a date to be published for the EGM, and a detailed accusation to be published, so that Solgold can reply to it. Also let's see this alternate BOD . Up to now, I see no evidence of any wrong doing. Maybe CGP's tactics are to damage the Solgold share price, and try to say it's NM that is to blame. I still think this is all nonsense, and will not take place.
Addicknt
I'm guessing if it was an official complaint Solg would of already responded.
As its just a whingy child throwing toys out of a pram they have decided to ignore and imo makes the accusers look even more stoopid.
mornin folks
what I miss?
bn.c
addicknt, NM is probably enjoying the squirm factor. I think it would take eons to get this to court and proven one way or the other.
My opinion is.....CGP will get hung out to dry by all parties!
Indeed. The allegation made by CGP is very serious and potentially libellous. It appears there are two options: 1) it's true or, 2) it's wholly untrue, but NM has decided not to take legal action.
If I were NM and were confident it's a lie, I'd challenge CGP to produce the evidence. If they failed to do so, their whole defence would be seriously weakened.
So, the question for me is, why hasn't NM taken this route?
Yep, blink and you missed them!
those first four posts soon disappeared.