We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Mani - “I am not aware of you ever questioning negatvive comments on here, only the positive ones...”
The irony in your statement is hilarious try and practice what you preach for a change.
"Don’t forget they were peer reviewed !!!!!!!"
What were peer reviewed?
ATS 2022 Conference Report18 Jul '22
Courtesy of Reddit
Page 3 & 4
https://conferences.medicom-publishers.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/E_MCR-ATS-2022.pdfATS 2022 Conference Report18 Jul '22
FRONT PAGE LEFTHAND SIDE IN GREEN LETTERS "PEER REVIWED"
Haha Tommy - Only you and Manifesto thought the ATS report constituted some kind of peer review.
Mani - just quoting your injudicious words. - which are not an accurate statement of the current situation.
"“ I would say the odds of SNG becoming a commercial success are greatly in our favour.”
Wait for the trial and then we'll all be ramping together. - but at the moment nothing is "greatly in our favour"
Don’t forget they were peer reviewed !!!!!!!
Doc.Daneeka
You just cannot help yourself can you....
Yes the data from the Deep Dive shows conclusively that SNG works for a certain group..
That is surely why ATS "invited" us to present the results as an esteemed panel
reviewed them and considered them worthy of an audience of some of he worlds
acclaimed Medics/Scientists... My positivity is based on such facts.. not plucked
out of thin air.. You are just so blinkered to anything I post you cannot be objective...
Seriously take a look at yourself..... You are no longer credible on here...
“ I would say the odds of SNG becoming a commercial success are greatly in our favour.”
You call out FtC for negativity and then - in yet another paean of positivity - come out with a statement that is palpably untrue and demonstrably unrepresentative of the current situation. SP doesn’t tell the whole tale but clearly it rates our odds much lower than 50/50 - let alone the margin you suggest. It’s enthusiasm - nothing more sinister I’m sure - but we need to wait until we get onto a trial before this might remotely be true. And you need to temper your language if you’re going to be the arbiter of balance. Atb to you both
A lot of studies have been done about succes rates in biotech
One of them showed a 40% chance going from fase 2 to 3.
And a 57% chance of failing phase 3
If upside in a share is more than 100% it makes sense chance of succes is below 50..
But hee everybody succes with their own investment strategy.
DYOR. Never invest based on others research
Professional.
Not sure where you have got those figures from... But on a serious note I think that
when you have P3 data to digest you can make the kind of judgement that you
cannot on a complete start up in the Bio sector.....So although we did not meet the endpoints
on SPRINTER the Deep Dive Data has provided a huge amount of insight to identify
patients that would benefit and ultimately determine that SNG001 has commercial potential.
Hopefully the Peer Review will be published soon and cement that view.. So I would
say the odds of SNG becoming a commercial success are greatly in our favour.
As we are now looking to be included on trials that we will not fund, I think it is fair to say
that we will only succeed because the data we can provide for consideration is compelling..
SNG would certainly have been a punt at the outset, but I think we have enough data now
to suggest otherwise....ATB!
Maybe it is good to talk about what research means....
Especially in context of biotech....
I do agree some of the posters here seem to poses knowledge about the industry and or medicines...
But people for get the context .... the average time for a product to get to market is 12 years. The chance of getting to market is 1 in 5000. So this is at best a punt.
And with a management that hasnt made it a priority to comminicqte with investors....
Just my opinion. And let me be clear again i am here to buy at 20 for a punt. DYOR
Mani: if godess is correct i will like to meet at next agm
Always worthwhile reading peoples comment history.
It helps you filter the incessant negative posters who virtually never offer any research, always tend towards negativity opinion and downplay any positive news as soon as it appears.
FTC is a case in point
Goddess??
Mani just shut up you total ...
.
FTC
I am not aware of you ever questioning negatvive comments on here, only the positive ones...
So pretty much a one sided view... Investing is about balancing the risk...do the pros outweigh
the cons.... If you fail to recognise the pros then your judgement is flawed.. Or to put it another way..
If you cannot see any pros then surely you do not invest..... There has been a massive amount
of negative posts on here this week..... Yet not one comment from you....!!!
Why would I apologise?
I don’t believe I’ve ever said that SNG is finished, going into administration, or is due a placing. I just try to be realistic. I still have my small position in the hope that they will come good but so far management have achieved very little that offers rewards to shareholders. It’s a high risk/potentially high reward play (although I am becoming less convinced of the potential scale of reward).
I don’t see it as my "role" to criticise positive oplnions on here. I don’t see myself as having a "role" on here". I do think it’s helpful for all posters to query unrealistically positive or negative comments.
FTC....
Ever thought that it can be damaging to post over negative comments..
This stock is finished, placing coming, going into administration.....Where is the evidence?
Answer, there is none.. What evidence is there that SNG can succeed....Plenty.. Look at
the Deep Dive Data... ATS "invited SNG to present the results ... Numerous
Scientists publishing articles on the importance of interferons..
Ploy/TFG continued
to buy stock after SPRINTER..... If we get a place on STRIVE that will be a huge endorsement
of our potential and the SP will most likely rise to possibbly 2 or 3 times the current SP...
So much negativity may encourage some holders to sell and possibly miss out on
a profit, or opportunity to reduce their losses... Trust posters like you will then apologise...Or just disappear...?
For the record.. We were all shocked at some of the posts on CINE yesterday, you cannot compare
it to SNG they have massive debts and their marketplace is not on trend....The revenue could barely
cover the interest payments and all of that info was in the public domain making it a very risky
investment..... No similarities to SNG...So keep things in perspective if you think
your role is to criticise postive opinions on here!
"Just want to say I ruined my life thanks to the stupid decision to invest in this share and listening to the positive posters rather than the (now I realise) realistic negative ones."
This is why I get dragged into criticising over positive posts/posters. It can be very damaging.
A P3 protocol without going up against SOC (with dynamic SOC during P3) would not get approval from an ethics committee. Particularly for a new disease with rapidly developing treatments.
Therefore there was no error in the protocol, in my opinion
They're not "characters". They have stated they enjoying harming people and do it for pleasure. That's a sign of a serious personality disorder not a "colourful character". One of the posters has stalked someone in real life and attempted to gain private email correspondance with a female poster. Again, big red flags. I would not trust them alone with women or children.
Bin it.
Don't feed it.
I don't filter them because whenever they appear the board is dominated by angry responses and it would all be meaningless without seeing the catalyst. I don't respond to them though. If we all did this the poison would just sit there - the barbs quivering but finding no target -ringed by an impenetrable wall of contempt.
I don't think blocking Mr Costs or Andyb4 is the answer tbf. If you do that you may as well block manifesto for suggesting this is going to £3. Both are polar opposites but I would suggest ramping is just as bad if not worse. People could end losing more than they should by listening to a ramper than the likes of Mr C or Andyb4.
Just enjoy this board for what it is and don't take it too serious. This board would be dull without the characters.
You should all seriously filter Mr C
I haven’t got a clue what he’s typing and I’m so much the happier not knowing or caring
It's the only month we have had no RNS, yet.
Dunk - I agree scare mongering like that is simply untrue. Half yearly results are due soon and will factually put to bed any cash concerns.
Have we not all worked out by now that Mr Costs is a wind up?
OMG......Ghia .... The Preacher has landed.......
Posters here are just showing genuine concern for those invested in CINE...
Your POMPOUS post about a wake up call is so typical of you .....
Trust you are including yourself in that but "to you all" would imply not....
You might Lecture somewhere but don't do it here......................