Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
My own personal view on sp forecast comes down to pure logic. If we pass all the trials and obtain approval leading to the drug becoming commercial then it will be worth much more than £3 to £5, if it doesn’t succeed it will be under a pound. The success of last years phase 2 trial surely makes our odds of success much greater.
Queen - what is your reasoning for this statement? Would be helpful to understand the hypothesis for the outlook
“ £3-5 still represents a superb return”
Ty
Great question to prof Wilko, I was wondering the same. Pls post answer if one comes? Thx
https://twitter.com/Neelie001/status/1380996288750227461?s=20
To be fair I agree about gut instinct and it's something I often use when I invest and had some remarkable results..
Always trust your gut instincts, something I think isn't utilised enough...
Please ignore him.
The guy needs help from a professional.
He hasn’t taken the hint based on all the likes to him leaving, and never getting many himself, that he is disruptive, and constantly subtly negative. He ruins the board.
I feel for him on a personal level, but this isn’t the forum for his redemption.
Anyone with any sense would understand it’s either a lot more than £3 or a lot less.
He made it up as it’s what he hopes. Stop grasping at straws and form your own opinion
You got that right Scott, nobody likes a smart arse. Please go away, again.
OK org...
:)
Org, if you check back on the facts you started the insults when I was just asking you simple questions and for some reason you went off on one... Also, having a go at me for not giving a sp prediction is a little different as unlike you I've never given one so why start now?... I have a lot of money invested hence my annoyance when you decide to support derampers that you know are disliked by the majority, it appears you do it for allies and to annoy the board further... I find it strange that despite your claim of family and friends reading here and the reason you changed names doesn't really add up considering it's no secret who you are and they must still be reading here?.... you still haven't explained your creation of 'Scott' the other day? I think its safe to say that 99% of this board wouldn't be so eager to post here if their family and friends were watching them in constant battles and keep returning for more... mind boggling..
Right, thats all..
and his I'll -> and his ilk
Ray,
Are you sure you've just described Org and not BoJo? Perhaps they're the same person?
Don't waste your time on shady figures like that. Great times for SNG are a-coming, and Org and his I'll will run away with their tail between their legs.
ATB
EP
Anyway the board know full well what org is all about, he will just revert back and forth on a whim for attention...
A narcissist imo
Rule breaker tick
Impulsive tick
Grandiosity tick
Entitled tick
Attention seeking tick
Manipulative tick
Lack of empathy tick
Gaslighting tick
Lies tick
Have a good weekend all
I've never smoked but apparently org thinks I smoke weed amongst a few others here, based off what?
Ray,
Nothing wrong with weed smoking. In fact, a lot of posters here would benefit greatly from a relaxing bong every so often.
Why do you keep changing your name org? And what was Scott all about?
Oh I see org, not so long ago you accused me of being a weed smoker and being silly, what was that based off?
Also, if you really want to get to know someone personally why not use Facebook?
Wow
the trouble maker is BACK AGAIN!
Shameless man
I do wonder what the board would be like if we all had many user names...
Happy Birthday for tomorrow Doc
The post is aimed at all of us, myself included.
Keep posting wood, I'm sure the board would much prefer you than our crazy troll...
I said I wouldn't post, anymore sexist posts. I really didn't realize that I had caused so much offence.
Again I apologise profusely.
Take care all.
Doc Yes I have called this out and he has apologised and gone on as before, more frequent and dare I say more extreme.
Doc this is a public forum. If Woody conducted himself like this in the workplace he would be fired for repeated gross misconduct. No ifs or buts.
Folk supporting this are hiding behind anonymity and believing one of their cyber pals is being attacked.
Yes there has been another apology but to my mind this guy needs professional help it’s not just mis speaking once but virtually every post is crassly inappropriate.
Oak has supported Woody consistently when others have called him out on his behaviour. Again he has initiated another post telling others to leave Woody alone.
Woody needs to stop with obsessive sexualised posts. Plain and simple.
Oakleaf72 trying to moderate others with your go easy on him chap he’s one of us messaging is at best misguided.
There are no doubt many women invested here and coercively supporting someone posting frequently which clearly sets out to demean them is I think called ‘Enabling ‘.
You are a persuasive individual of long standing but in this instance you are simply defending the indefensible, it has gone on far too long. Presumably because posters are scared of the backlash from you and your pals who are acting as ‘when an Inspector Calls’.
Now can we get back to what we are here for ?