Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I have 33% of my portfolio invested here but my portfolio is now 100% from generated profits. So much less stress investing this way.!
For probably the first time ever I have to disagree with Ghia. There may be a few good companies on AIM but most prefer to be on the main market which provides much better reporting providing confidence to many large investors that would not be able to participate in an AIM listed stock and makes the stock much less vulnerable to price manipulation. Almost entirely positive to grow into a main listing especially as you are no longer effectively controlled by your Nomad/Broker who permission you require before you can take virtually any action.
There are good companies on Aim many which choose not to list to the main markets because there really is no point.
Main markets bring extra reporting overhead which costs money, the benefit is they bring a larger pool of investors and funds to your disposal for cash raising exercises.
If I was a mid cap cash generating and cash rich company I’d probably rather be on AIM than FTSE.
They do exist on AIM by the way...
If your old and grey and you are about to retire then going "All in" is a lot more risky than if you are in your early thirties. The chances of you recovering the closer to your retirement become slimmer.
However if your in your thirties and have your house paid for and have a steady job with a good gaurenteed income and you can recover from your loss within 2 years, then thats a different ball game altogether. Everyone has there own strategy which will be tied into there wealth, age and apetite for risk and there is nothing wrong with that. Nobody has advised anyone to go "all in here". Each to there own, we are all here to make some cash at the end of the day.
I do not qualify for the "lots of all in " club but I certainly qualify for the reserve team.
As we all know to our cost AIM is an MM's playground or sweetshop and having lost heavily when Xcite Energy when it went ti*s up I vowed to steer clear in the future.
The case for Synairgen was so compelling however, that I ( against all perceived wisdom )over invested I suppose in some ways to fight back against AIM and also to hopefully regain my losses.
All is well so far with my losses wiped out and with a modest profit also.
If sng is not taken over then its m.c. would surely qualify it for the FTSE 350 and exit this unpredictable casino forever.
Mr Big - It’s all relative, I’m sure many here have a large % of their total wealth invested in stocks and shares. If this is then invested in a single stock or share this is incredibly risky.
If you have a small % of your wealth invested in stocks and shares investing in a single well chosen stock is less risky.
Without being a qualified financial adviser and having a detailed knowledge of your clients financial situation it’s unwise to recommend any approach be that 10%, 20% or higher.
The stock is excellent - no doubt about that. And I, myself am way overexposed here at the moment.
But a lot of people here are sitting on bigger winnings than their mind can comfortably handle and all this all-in chat is unnecessary and dangerous. And is most likely powered by dumb rampers with a couple quid on a day trade...
_Mr_Big - Hah. Very well put. I'm probably the former, to a degree, but in knowing that, try very hard not to be, or at least less so ;)
All on is a big risk - I don’t go more than 25% of my portfolio but this is a good stock. Gut feel says phase 3 trials will be needed so not expecting lift off until much later in the year - be patient
"investors are 'All In' here"
Investors are never all in. Compulsive gamblers - yes. Investors - no.
Hi, In your eyes, what will it need to drop to for you to invest?
Chris, I was disapointed with several construction companies being taken over, then PFD and Flybe and whilst I am invested here I am not putting above 5% of my portfolio in because my burnt fingers are still healing!
My thoughts,
The fact that so many investors are 'All In' here, as well as the huge chunks declared on the RNS signals a great confidence.
All-In breaks the rules of investing, but in the current climate, with such a treatment going through the formalities, it seems inevitable that we will all gain... big!.
Half my portfolio is now here, on the next drop I will certainly be adding.