Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Ruck also posted earlier ....
""" No negatives on the science from me """
so Game over then ...
not exactly risky if you cannot identify it ... like trying to jump a traffic light on Green ...
""""""""" The data on SCIB1 suggests a higher price than 5.5 may be achieved."""""""""
thank the lord for that .......... End
oh .. sorry it was posted on your account .. ATB
i did not know it had been hijacked ...
No my forecast isn’t £10 as you know.
You really are a dangerous individual, your posts need to come with a wealth warning.
its not really an example is it .......... your forecast is £10 ...
No, it’s not the only complaint. I tried to post all your errors but got “out of memory” message when I tried to paste them in.
Besides, if you can’t accept one obvious example, what’s the point?
Inan,
The data on SCIB1 suggests a higher price than 5.5 may be achieved.
That certainly does NOT = “no risk here”
Erroneous and dangerous. Let’s just hope no one takes any notice of you.
the data on SCIB1 .. v Mcap .. also = no risk here ...
ATB
its not incorrect ...
No risk here ...IMHO >> as i am the writer
how YOU perceive that statement is up to you ... if that is your only compliant after 32K posts ... well ..
You should have qualified your post - “for me, there is no risk”
Instead of stating “NO RISK HERE”
By using those words YOU have made it universal. I am merely interpreting YOUR words as YOU have written them.
As I said, dangerous statements do need to be challenged.
If I made an incorrect statement I would want someone to correct it.
for me there is no risk .......
Risk is personal ..
only you make it universal ...
"" Some of the things he comes out with are just plain wrong""
“NO RISK”
For example, incorrect and dangerous, certainly needed challenging which it was from several quarters.
Well I have 220k others that rack my nerves, lol!!!!
Yes, if you think 5.5p is good value because it will hit 7p/10p/50p, it matters not if it did drop to 4p. Just a little less nerve racking if it didn’t!
Always the way Ruck, just for me at a buy in price of 5.5p, regardless of whether we/hit 4.5/5, any one of a few items of good news will take us to 7.5/8. Thereforefor me it is worth a trade. The alternative is waiting and good news could well come, but so would 5.5p!!
C7,
Just goes to show, we can come to the same conclusion for different reasons or a different conclusion for the same reason!
Nowt as queer as folk as they say.
Ruck...............""..You are right, I can’t remember us ever having a cross word despite disagreeing on many things. You see where we are now as a buying opportunity as the SP could well jump on good news. I take a contrarian view that it may drop with a placing. We therefore take different actions, no need to fall out about it. If this gets to £1 in the next year your buy and my hold won’t really have much difference will it?""
Well ithas been me saying I believe we will have a placing very soon, but dependant on the deal, definitive reasons for it and hopefully timelines for trials, a potential deal on Avidimab and don"t forget them TCRs, this could well still bounce. Remember we rose to 9.4p when Vulpes bought in at 5p previously 3.5p. Iguess the difference is I feelthe needfor a placing couldnegate any fall with the whiff of good news. Time will tll eh!!
Fair enough ... perhaps Bermuda might better explain himself as he has suggested he would
Inanaco................"".but you still keep bringing up 4 years ago C7""
Inan, again I don"t think you have read my posts over four years, but we have spoken on the phone a few times and there are no issues between us, fact, on the contrary I have defended you on nearly every occassion when the mob descends on you, to my detriment on most cases. As I have said to you even on the phone, I do think you can do more to avoid many of the conflicts on here, as I do those who pick up on every word you say as again happened last week.
So no don"t take itpersonally,it is what it is, but I certainly don"t have an issue with you, we can see the issue on the BB
"" Some of the things he comes out with are just plain wrong""
be interested to see that post Ruck ... "in context"
Chelsea your 10:03..
No it wasn’t Inan who said it was MichaelHighBar. MHB posted loads of negatives along with a more positive “ludicrously cheap” comment. Inan latched onto this and reposted regularly over the next few days. I wanted to see who, on here, thought the share was ludicrously cheap. Personally I don’t, if I did, I would be buying. I think it is cheap compared to its potential.
You have to accept there is a difference between “belittle” and “challenge”. A lot of what Inan says needs to be challenged for the benefit of the less informed. Some of the things he comes out with are just plain wrong. This may be because he expresses his opinion as fact or he gets over enthusiastic. Also, his poor English sometimes conveys an idea he perhaps did not mean.
You are right, I can’t remember us ever having a cross word despite disagreeing on many things. You see where we are now as a buying opportunity as the SP could well jump on good news. I take a contrarian view that it may drop with a placing. We therefore take different actions, no need to fall out about it. If this gets to £1 in the next year your buy and my hold won’t really have much difference will it?
but you still keep bringing up 4 years ago C7 ... you should accept its in the past and get over it. I have not got involved with any dispute involved with you for years ... even your TF wars i stayed out of it ... and that was very recent ..
let he who is without sin cast the first stone
Chelsea,
I'm out and about at the moment, taking one of the kids to an appointment. Just wanted to quickly say that my post wasn't aimed at anyone in particular. We are where we are and I'm certain that we actually all want the same outcome. Will reply fully when I get back.
Inanaco true, it is from memory but history too. Nothing buddy that I have net said to you in the past, and even when we do peak i say it too.
It is a shame because it is not necessary the whole time, but I do agree some needed attacking, lol. If you read my posts properly you would see iI tend to defend you mostly, especially when a few gang up on you, but then I don"t know what goes on on ADVFN a lot of it seems like cross board retaliation and I don"t think that is fair for many of us on LSE BB. Thata all
From memory
C7 attacks
knowlesi
Lemoore
Smiley
Tosh
Lozan
Yoda
the list goes on and on .............. read your own history C7 ....