Our latest Investing Matters Podcast episode with QuotedData's Edward Marten has just been released. Listen here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
@Hedgehog100. Getting warmer. I think many here have the hand of the puppet master up their backside. lol
You are wrong about the ducks though..they look like geese to me. They look to be about to lay the golden eggs. :)
GLA DYOR
"Thanks Schaden - words out of my mouth...."
Perhaps it's even the same mouth? I.e. Jezabel is also posting as Schaden on this site?
Very similar styles of writing, and very similar views.
And posters like this do seem to like talking to themselves, and supporting themselves.
This would be a clear breach of LSE's terms & conditions, and would also be criminal.
Certainly something for the Financial Conduct Authority.
"I don't know who or what you're talking about - but I do know what market abuse is: ..."
Schaden,
You obviously can't read very well then, because I very clearly stated that I was talking about the poster Jezabel on LSE, who posts as Pilotov on ADVFN.
Jezabel-Pilotov is not denying this, although he was trying to pose as someone different here, having requested on ADVFN that we filter each other, to give a dishonest impression of there being more bear posters on RMS than there actually is.
Your quote on market abuse isn't a definition, let alone an exhaustive definition: it is merely giving one example of what may constitute it, i.e. insider dealing.
A different type of market abuse is where somebody is wilfully posting dishonestly for financial gain: they may have no insider information, but they would certainly be committing market abuse.
Here's some of LSE's views on market abuse, which say nothing about insider dealing:
https://www.lse.co.uk/chat/general/help-and-feedback/market-abuse-F851CD7E-D2C7-4AF2-BB8F-C1B5EF721CE9.html
If someone (e.g. Jezabel-Pilotov) is posting on one share only, and no others, always negatively, quite often, on multiple sites, with different user names, over an extended period, and with no explanation, then there is no way that they are a genuine poster. Anyone who thinks otherwise is being very naive.
A poster like Jezabel-Pilotov will never give RMS any real credit for anything, or to Trevor Brown for the excellent work he's been doing here.
Thanks Schaden - words out of my mouth....
I don't know who or what you're talking about - but I do know what market abuse is: "Market abuse may arise in circumstances where financial market investors have been unreasonably disadvantaged, directly or indirectly, by others who have used information which is not publicly available (insider dealing) and have distorted the price-setting mechanism of financial instruments." It has sweet FA to do with chat sites! I will be positive about this share when I get my money back and be positively ecstatic if I ever make a profit!
Jezabel,
You are Pilotov on ADVFN, and you seem to post about no other stock but this on both sites.
Always unrelentingly negative.
You clearly have some sort of dishonest agenda, so may I suggest that you please stop, or I will be reporting you to LSE for market abuse. They don't stand for this sort of thing.
My position is obvious: I'm a bullish shareholder here. But you in contrast won't put your cards on the table.
This share has massive strengths: what is rather weak is your silly, infantile bashing campaign.
P.S. You said just a few days ago on ADVFN that you were filtering me, and then you come straight here to comment on my posts!!
ashamed to say I am
...who has invested heavily in this rather weak share!