Our latest Investing Matters Podcast episode with QuotedData's Edward Marten has just been released. Listen here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I can't see WNC & WND will need to be financed unless WNB is successful. If WNB is successful I don't think we'll be too worried about financing WNC & WND as the share price will be significantly higher.
The only thing as far as I can see that may need more funding in the near term is a new project. I think that's pretty unlikely.
So I think the boys have already got a good plan in place for meeting funding requirements. £4m in the bank and £5m cash facility.
NVG........Californian results is chicken feed if W.N comes good. This really is not so much about the financial results of California although they are nowhere to be seen, so one can only assume they are very poor. We know if good they would have been posted at the first available opportunity.
Its's a matter of a little word with a massive meaning....that word is TRUST!
I notice no one has picked up my suggestion about offering to ask the BOD about Cali and its performance. I wonder why; could it be they know I am correct.
persi, c £41m market cap - is this too high or too low ?
Cali is not relevant in the big scheme of things, no-one needs to prove you wrong
I don't think they need to raise capital this side of the probable good news - which if it's as anticipated will make the share price go up (lots)
If many of us are wrong then £41m might be too high if the drill doesn't turn out as expected, we can procrastinate as much as we want but it's a straight risk and reward play on WN as I see it..
Alexios.
.... the PEDL 183 joint venture is funded for: the drilling activity at WNB-1; the testing programme at both WNA-2 and WNB-1; and for a further well, for which planning consents are already in place, at the West Newton B site (WNB-2).
I see as expected no details on the Californian fields other than a meaningless operational cost per barrel.. We all know why, but they should be publishing all the same. Bet any questions to the heavenly twins on Cali actual revenue meets a brick wall. Why don't some of you try to prove me wrong?
Thanks
Can you point me where does it say RBD already paid their stske costs for B1 well please.
This £5.4M cash balance is excluding these costs or not
That's the crucial part.
UJO haven't paid yet so I am assuming RBD haven't paid either
So this £5.4M cash will almost entirely go towards B1 well cost
They're already paid Alexios.
'The WNB-1 well is a crucial well for the West Newton project, as it will evaluate both the Kirkham Abbey and Cadeby formations. We are delighted that the Rathlin team has managed to push ahead with the B site operations despite the extreme challenges posed by events since March this year as a result from the fall-out from the Covid-19 pandemic. We are fortunate to be in a position where the West Newton JV is fully funded for its planned activity.'
I believe Rathlin is fully funded for WN A and B, no problem there.
This is excluding WN B1 well costs and A2 EWT and B1 flowtest yes???
B1 cost?
Where do you get £10m?
I saw a ye cash £5.4m, less £1.4m paid for WN stake increase, plus £250k AT, say £4.25m, less opex to date
That's fine unless they need to inject any into Coralian to progress projects, or have other plans we are unaware of.
And note the words on thec "discretionary cas facility", which despite the line "This discretionary cash facility was seen, by the Board, as a prudent measure to provide increased liquidity without the need to dilute shareholders unduly by way of an equity fundraise" does exactly that if drawn down, by issuing new shares to Acuitas.
It is a "discretionary equity line cash facility " meaning a fast route to new issuance, if used.
So skimming through they currently have access to the best part of £10m to keep them running, would have liked more detail on Cali, appreciate most not that bothered but frustrates sometimes when things are seemingly sidelined without much info although obviously not been an ideal 6 months.
Time to focus on West Newton and Romania updates near term, fingers crossed, should be good!
I thought we might have had a mention of Grizzly island, anyone know the latest on that?
Agree, I don’t really understand the sector as well as I would like but I understand balance sheets and numbers - these not only look ok but better than I anticipated.
Nothing to see here, certainly no immediate need to raise funds, so now for some free hits at adding value to the bottom line.
Nice update, lots to mull over and loss for the year was well controlled.