Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Persimmon,
I know both Chris Hutch & Simon said. Neither have disappeared
Your first post on this bb was 12th March 2018, and your first post on any LSE bb was 5th July 2012, according to LSE.
There's nothing sinister in cancelling membership of LSE, then later re-joining. As I'm sure you know, you can't readopt the same name, so you can rest your case 'til the cows come home. On this bb you are the one who is trying to con so-called 'newbies'.
Rubey, I have been on LSE boards for many a long year. Where in heavens name have you got the idea I've only been on since 2018. Think you better contact the LSE, and find out they will tell you, as it does not come under the data protection act.
In my experience people who do not believe others and are actually them liars, are the ones who need to be carefully watched themselves. I see you mentioned the possibility of coming back under a new name........Hmm I rest my case.
persi, I'm very surprised you don't post your doom and gloom on the UJO BB, would seem to me they have climbed higher up a ladder with a smaller interest in WN, so with things equalling out their share price will have further to fall if results don't meet expectations! Perhaps their need is greater than ours, maybe you should go over there and worn them what a big mistake they are all making!
persimmon, this was your 5th post on this bulletin board, March 18:
'For those who are expecting oil to be produced soon (assuming there is oil and if so then it's worth extracting).
From appraisal through development and then extraction usually takes a MINIMUM of 5 years. There are many hoops to 'jump through', and these are not overcome overnight. Just saying so 'newbies' will know that is why these ventures are classed as 'high risk'.OMO as always.'
Not changed much, have you. But at least you were right.... oh no... you weren't.
persimmon, I don't need to ask their opinions, I've been reading and posting on this board for years (it is possible to cancel with LSE, take time off and come back with a new name). Plus your posting history is there for all to see. Your first post was March 2018, just 2 years 5 months ago, fwiw.
As far as you saying you held shares or you'd made a great profit, well anyone can say that can't they? As far as Chris or Simon are concerned, they can only go by what you tell them.
Common sense also dictates that anyone who'd made 100% profit (lol) would be praising the company they'd invested in, not sIagging it off at every opportunity.
You will know that nearly all II's have at least one high risk company in their asset stream. That usually does not even come near 1% of their total holdings of many millions or billions of pounds with most. A drop in the ocean to the 'big boys' and just a punt that if comes off can be very lucrative. If not (and history tell us the odds are stacked against, that's why they are classed high risk} their losses are small in comparison with their total holdings, whereas with many a small trader...............
Rubey, your new to this board. Ask ChrisHutch and Simon_said whether I was here years ago, and whether I bought in at around .49p and sold at 1p making about 100%. Strange since, that those very experienced traders both have disappeared. ChrisHutch has a site....ask him, and whether or not he still has RBD in his porfolio. He's a decent gut and may well tell you.
Percy, you have not answered my question.
Will the II's that were involved in raising £24 million at .9p be Ok with S&S just running the company for their salary take as you suggest at the top of this thread?
Your normal rubbish persimmon. You've never held shares here. From day 1 you were anti this company. If you'd ever made a profit as you claim you're the sort of person who'd rub other people's noses in it at the time. Never anything but criticism all the way.
"especially those new to trading go into the market with their eyes wide open"
Oh I see, it's a public service you're offering, to get potential new investors to do some due diligence?
I maybe 'missed the boat' when this slipped to sub 0.4p, but those that have been here a long time will know I doiubled my money prior to that. I wish no one to lose on there investments, but remember not all, especially those new to trading go into the market with their eyes wide open. They can be easily taken in by the Ramping fraternity, do you agree Rubey?
No you don't!
I hope you're right Rubey.
No, the RNS will probably read "Reabold are pleased to announce the sale of it's PEDL 183 interests for £500m..."
Coming on down the line if any kind of success at W.N?
"We believe that the prevailing market conditions are not conducive to entering into discussions with prospective buyers at the present time".
Because he wasn’t patient with his holding & lost a fortune!
Out of all the oil and gas companies on LSE why did you have to pick on this one to troll? Or do you have a different avatar for each bb. There are plenty of the 'keep it in the ground brigade' pretending to post as legitimate shareholders on all the little AIM oilers, or so I thought. Maybe they're all just you, carrying out your sad little 'duty' to save the planet.
back on the salary tactic.. very weak. Also besmirches the character of the CEO's so reportable.. again.
On a logical note, you are saying the Institutional Investors at .9p are happy for S&S to take their £24 million? is that it? is that what you are saying? Please clarify.
"Spud coming up and we won't have 'years' to wait. In a few weeks"
Meanwhile back in the counting house................looking at how these gratefully accepted annual remuneration packagesr can be spun out for the next twenty years, the future plan is developing !
Experienced investors in O&G see 'this game' in play with more exploration companies than you can shake a stick at.