Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Not sure that you have answered the question regarding plc level funding (non project) in 6 months time? Deep pocket directors putting coins in the meter or an equity raise. M&G perhaps at 15p?
Don't worry about rainbow, they don't have to raise finance for a project that on today's pricing would be loss making as PRE would.
Take a look at HZM if you think that the current proposed finance will be enough for completion on time and the appetite of financiers elsewhere as a result.
The terms at best will be crippling.
The problem pre had was Saltend and the debacle of breaking ground twice. The mine could have been producing by now.
Good luck to all that still have faith in the companies rhetoric. At least the Angolan near by have benefited ftom the "Well paid jobs". Almost akin to the PRE board.
I will await your neurotic multiple posts in response :-)
Not me Hogsnipe! Bizarre mash-up of out of date information.
Anyone make any sense of this:
https://jornalf8-net.translate.goog/2024/terras-raras-governo-vulgar-povo-lixado/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-GB
Mish-mash of years-out-of-date stuff with a couple of startling claims. What to make of it?
"On 28 March 2024, two of the company’s directors have made available a loan facility of GBP 2 million to meet the underlying operating costs of the UK over the next 6 to 9 months"
Given Saltend financing is contingent on LJ being financed, it is good to see Directors putting their own money in - and not an insignificant amount either. No doubt the regular downrampers will attempt to negatively spin the loan, but anyone invested or thinking of investing in PRE should be encouraged by this development.
Worth a 10 min read - can't disagree much with Cornford's views:
https://masterinvestor.co.uk/commodities/green-seedling-part-2/
ALK - speculative punt, PRE not just yet.
Thanks Hogsnipe.
Key nuget for me is: Review by the six-member board, head of investment and key analysts of
FSDEA to review the early-stage construction activities being funded by
the US$15 million bridging loan from FSDEA, ahead of conclusion of the
main financing.
Lewis just took a moment to read through Rainbow's Interims.. three more years to catch up with PRE!
How much more equity with they need to raise to fund the DFS and then the FEED and then the Financing.. first full year of production 2027/8 .. maybe? (US$15-25m?)
From today's RNS:
Rainbow is currently carrying out a Definitive Feasibility Study ("DFS") at Phalaborwa, which is on track to be completed in the last quarter of 2024/early 2025. Following completion of the DFS, a Final Investment Decision will be made by the Board prior to construction and the expected commencement of operations by the end of 2026.
Lengthy coverage of Pernsana's unaudited 6 monthly results to 31 Dec 2023 on FT site today:
https://markets.ft.com/data/announce/detail?dockey=600-202403280928PR_NEWS_PRUKDSCL_0099-1
Combing for nuggets now....
Move along Lewis.
I would be a lot more worried about Rainbow right now if i were you. Circa £1 million in the bank to fund the project as well as its corporate overheads. Next raise 5p? Maybe Chairman Zero can help out?
PRE by contrast has FSDEA US$15 million funding to fund the project as well as deep pocket Directors funding the G&A.
Crunch time. Hopefully the week long visit results in signatures.
2 mill loan from directors to keep lights on in the UK in the meantime for next 6-9 months.
Question, post 6-9 months, where will bill money come from, a raise? Guessing it can't be done against the ring fenced project so guessing group equity.
Interesting times.
High time the Western politicians, the banks and industry users of rare earths all agreed that high tariffs should go on all Chinese rare earth exports and magnets etcetera and seriously support an independent supply chain away from China. Those countries using Chinese imported rare earth material to should have tariffs imposed on any product they export to countries supporting a western supply chain security model. Unfortunately to many people take backhanders from the Chinese Government as reported on GB news this evening and that includes certain people in our own parliament.
TheGreekLizard - Goldman Sachs may be optimistic, but tightening markets and lower interest rates won't be the key drivers for rare earth magnet metals and materials future pricing.
This is well worth a read (Feb 21 2024):
https://theoregongroup.com/investment-insights/the-wests-pursuit-of-rare-earths-hits-resistance-from-china/
China only needs to paralyze Western investment in building independent rare eath supply chains for about another 3 or 4 years, and then it will have achieved complete domination and control of the market. This will be the main determinant of where Nd Pr materials prices are going in 2024 to 2030, not global demand or borrowing costs.
Some key points from the above link:
"Rare earth prices surged in 2022, but then fell to some of their lowest levels for years after China ramped up production to 210,000 tonnes in 2022. Then in 2023, China issued — for the first time since it introduced a quota system in the 1990s — three quotas in one year, with the total a record high of 255,000 tons, a 21.4% year-on-year increase.
This oversupply has flooded the market and put significant downward pressure on prices, especially as demand contracts with high interest rates hitting the energy transition".
Net profit at China Northern Rare Earth Group (one of the largest Rare Earth companies in China) is estimated to have fallen 60% from 2022-2023.
“If you’ve got 90% market share of magnet processing capacity, there’s a goldilocks price where you earn a return but you don’t encourage anyone in the rest of the world to build capacity”
Chinese companies are also moving to dominate the international industry, for example, Shenghe Resources, the largest importer of rare earths in China, has moved aggressively in just the last few years to influence the international market:
- acquired stakes in two Australian companies that own rare earth mines in Greenland and Tanzania, with exclusive rights to the minerals
- acquired a 7.7% stake in MP Materials, the largest mine and processing plant in the US
- acquired a 9.9% stake in Australia’s Vital Metals
- acquired Canada’s rare earths stockpile
The Oregon Group Report ends by asking the question:
Is the West prepared to finance long-term, higher-priced investments to bypass cheap and efficient Chinese supply chains that are working to suppress prices and technological advancement, buy up stock and potentially introduce export restrictions to tighten supply?
That is indeed the question....
(Bloomberg) -- Commodities will advance this year as central banks in the US and Europe move to reduce interest rates, helping to support industrial and consumer demand, according to Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
Raw materials may return 15% over 2024 as borrowing costs come down, manufacturing recovers, and geopolitical risks persist, analysts including Samantha Dart and Daan Struyven said in a March 24 note. Copper, aluminum, gold and oil products may climb, according to the bank, which also stressed the need for investors to be selective as gains wouldn’t be universal.
Commodities have made a modest advance in the first quarter, with crude strengthening, gold hitting a record, and copper topping $9,000 a ton. Policymakers at both the US Federal Reserve and European Central Bank have signaled their intention to reduce borrowing costs this year as inflation ebbs. In addition, China has flagged further support for its recovery.
“We find that US rate cuts in non-recessionary environments lead to higher commodity prices, with the biggest boost to metals (copper and gold in particular), followed by crude oil,” the analysts said. “Importantly, the positive impact on prices tends to increase with time, as the growth impulse from looser financial conditions filters through.”
Goldman’s cautiously bullish outlook echoes comments from other market watchers. Commodities are entering a fresh cyclical upswing aided by tighter supplies and an upturn in the global economy, Macquarie Group Ltd. said earlier this month. Jeff Currie, formerly the head of commodities research at Goldman and now at Carlyle Group LP, has also forecast gains as the Fed cuts rates. Elsewhere, JPMorgan Chase & Co. highlighted gold’s upside potential.
https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/goldman-says-commodities-to-benefit-as-central-banks-cut-rates-1.2051105
Lack of funding for new mining projects could reduce the availability of rare earth metals and minerals by 20-50%, creating shortages that impacts the production of batteries, McKinsey warns. Rising interest rates and less available finance made mining companies cut investment, with sector spending falling to around $40 billion in 2022, despite soaring demand.
Absolutely.
Theo having read the report do you stand by your opinion that TMC's report is childishly unprofessional, that the project is nonsense and that it will never be financed?
I read the report
Move along Lewis.
You have issues. You need to broaden your scope of understanding.
Feel free to post on rainbow board, it's a public forum.
Do you really think anything you say will sway an investor? If you think anything I say on here does, you're deluded.
Keep going Lewis and i will do some digging on the risks your beloved RBW faces and we can have the discussion on the RBW board.
Suggest you move on from here.
It highlights quite clearly that finance isn't the end of risk.
Might take your advice and invest in HZM according to you that was a sure thing wasn’t it?
Not bothered to read your 'invitation', aka unhinged rant.
Theo that's a big call. You are calling TMC's report childishly unprofessional, the project nonsense and that it will never be financed. You are of course entitled to your opinion. As i understand it you are an experienced analyst (and leaving aside your grudge with PA for a moment ) you obviously have some expert knowledge in the sector. Would you care to expand on how you have arrived at this point of view?
Talking to a brick wall.