Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
What does "interpreted" mean please...........!
I've got this "the evidence is difficult to interpret"
All the best (Hey TT-T....... more than welcome over there........ :)
TGB-2 now interpreted as western distal limit of the MOU-4 submarine fan ("MOU-4 Target")
Adon30,
So sorry for appearing obtuse, but where does it say that a connection has been established?
The rns told us that the original MOU1 ‘bright spot’ target of TGB2 was not actually a separate structure. It was found to be a trap of the TGB2a/MOU4 target.
Remember TGB2a was only established as being an additional target because of Covid delays and the location of MOU1 meant that they could also de-risk on the western extremity at the same time.
But it has since been established that they are connected.
I understood the 6 July RNS to suggest that MOU-4 was connected to various other reservoirs akin to the way MOU-1 seems to be. I had read GRH's msg below as suggesting that MOU-1 might not just be connected to MOU-4 but to others. I'm not sure I see how that is a good thing if correct as would not not lessen the de-risking of MOU-4 as that may be filled up more significantly by other connections instead?
https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2010/3014/
Interesting document on the levant basin. You have to click on the document to open a pdf.
Resevoirs not wells, sorry.
Grh,
As far as your final thought,
Wasn't it already suggested in the mou 1 rns that there were indeed multiple connections to shallower wells?
“what if it has become evident from the logs of MOU1 ...
that there is not ONLY connectivity (via SGB2A sands) to MOU4
but via MULTIPLE CONNECTIVITIES to other locations as well?”
If these sands are connected and supplied by an even deeper ‘kitchen’ does that mean they could continue to ‘refill’ once upper traps are found? Or have I gone the wrong way with that…?
I'm here Grh, brilliant post earlier, very understandable re sediment etc(if conditions are favourable)....now i'm just watching Bb and waiting, waiting, waiting for news ............
Gla
Taff
Bdt
Trying to understand a mere fraction of what you're saying?
Well I am, to no avail, I must confess!
Where is everyone?
Regards
GRH
For a clue on depth this may be worth people looking at (for the ones that haven’t already)
https://www.petropedia.com/2/9808/oil/biogenic-and-thermogenic-gases-how-significant-they-are-in-energy-space
Apologies for a missing word ...ONLY...at end of my previous post
Here is corrected version...
Fnal thought ...
what if it has become evident from the logs of MOU1 ...
that there is not ONLY connectivity (via SGB2A sands) to MOU4
but via MULTIPLE CONNECTIVITIES to other locations as well?
ATB
Regards
GRH
Morning
Following the somewhat bizarre conversation on here about areal extent and cubic size (sorry)
I just wanted to try to point out WHAT we are dealing with...
As...despite acres of posts...
I am very unconvinced this is understood by many on here (again sorry)
VERY BRIEFLY:
You might want to get your minds around this (you WILL want a strong coffee at hand and it's safest to sit down first)
The Guercif basin is about 60km x 50 kms
It is not homogenous (few hydrocarbon fields are) so please don’t rush off and multiply 60x 50kms (relax)
Prior to the opening of the Strait of Gibraltar...
the Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea were fully connected ...
it was via the so called Rifian Corridor
This seaway flowed THROUGH what is now called the Guercif basin (does an ear prick up?)
The seaway was then CONSTRICTED ...during the Messinian period (do both ears prick up?)
Then...following closure of the very narrow passage ...
the 'Messinian desiccation event' (of the Mediterranean Sea) took place
(the event is widely known in geological circles...as the Messinian salinity crisis)
In addition...
Guercif is located where the Middle Atlas mountains terminate ...
it's where they come up against the Rif thrust belt
We know that tectonic subsidence persisted until the Messinian period
AND ‘sediment loading’ continued to drive subsidence for a very extended period of time
So what?
...we are looking for gas? (we will find oil too I think)
Of course, for the production of that, there has to be a ‘kitchen’ at depth ...
In order to ‘cook’ the faeces deposited...via kerogen...into gas and oil (and condensates)
and to have a LOT of depositional faeces is a ‘pretty good thing’
But...
What if there was an EXTENDED period of deposition
AND both a subsidence and adjacent uplift ?
Maybe someone on here can have a look at the total depths of the deposits?
Think thousands of metres in places
I will leave you to your own enjoyable research now...(I will happily fill in some blanks when I have more time )
but suffice to say that...
when I spoke a while ago re Leviathan
(offshore Israel...it changed the politics of that region ...
due to discovering 17 TCF...(have you fallen out of your chair /spilt your coffee yet?)
It was on the basis that Guercif shares several important characteristics
with other areas that have gone on to become globally important
Final thought ...
what if it has become evident from the logs of MOU1 ...
that there is not connectivity (via SGB2A sands) to MOU4
but via MULTIPLE CONNECTIVITIES to other locations as well?
ATB
Regards
GRH