Stefan Bernstein explains how the EU/Greenland critical raw materials partnership benefits GreenRoc. Watch the full video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
My suggestions for succession planning highlight an interesting point. The people mentioned (plus many others I know of) are all readily identifiable public figures, have large shareholdings in PRD, and have lifetimes of relevant experience including working at director level in large (and very large) companies.
On the other hand, there is the little group of friends who appear at the same time to bolster each other's negative views. They are of course anonymous, never present any real knowledge of the industry or management experience, and are presumably not shareholders - indeed one even claims to be both a long-term shareholder and to have recently started buying.
Who should I believe? Such a difficult choice.
Av
Flip side also true- worth acknowledging positives/potential
Dave,
Never dismiss alternative views to your own. It is a real sign of weakness. Honestly, look at the negatives as well as wallowing in views you want to hear.
Seriously, it is good advice. Ignore it at your peril.
Maybe you will all awaken one day and have an epiphany moment and realise there is more to life than low-quality trolling.
AV .. stop being a twat… well actually they are useful, you know what’s coming.. just sit & watch😎
Howarda,
I agree with your concerns. Let's be realistic Paul will be long retired before any of the possibilities of this company are realised.
He will awaken one day and have an epiphany moment and spend his latter years with close family. He is well past retirement age as it is.
Lonny can't spin plates in three continents on his own. Absolutely no chance., so possibly huge ramifications to the business moving forward and certainly a valid and pertinent question to ask.
He said if you don’t like it go and invest elsewhere.
Toodle-pip!!
In the event of Paul's untimely demise, Caterham7 will do the subsurface, Cube will do the finance, GRH will do the negotiations, and I will write the RNSs and do the presentations. Payment in shares.
Yes he gave a reason by referring to the 5th February rns but was careful not to commit to a timeline on camera
Oh Porters didn’t you listen to Paul’s reply to your email in the presentation 🙈
Pretty sure the reason for mou-5 not be present in the presentation was explained during the presentation....also pretty sure prd is not aim, penny yes, but not aim..
Dyor
Aswell as all the confusion as to who is next in li e for sv101. Mou5 missing from the latest presentation timeline suggest to me no time frame is fixed.
Fair enough question if you ask this of all your invested companies. So would you ask it of Boeing or Virgin and what do you know of there ability to manage in these situations. Personally i reckon Lonnie would take over now as to his qualities i could not tell you nor do i know who would take over if Lonnie were to die of shock on hearing the news that PG had passed away. Get real this is a penny AIMS stock not a Blue Chip AAA Ftse 100 company. If you do not like do not invest.
Too too funny, "Howarda Hanging", your time would be much better spent improving your proficiency in English or at least before you troll post, running your text through error correction software. That way, you might have a grain of credibility regarding your worries for our near bionic Paul's health !!! 4 Troll posts out of 4. Bin, Bin, Bin !!! GLA, DONALB, a engineer :-)
Thank you everyone for your comments regarding potential plan b if sandjet didn't work. Especially thanks Keith for detail of reply.
My only other point was not necessarily a pleasant question. What happens if Paul is unable to continue due to age or ill health. I'm not sure if procedures are in place to ensure continuity. If anyone has any comments on this it would be appreciated.
My take for what it's worth. Patience is required. If a raise is required so be it. It seems to me unlikely no gas will flow as there are many horizons. Keith to me suggests it is reasonable to be optimistic.
As earlier mentioned I do question company continuity in the event of Paul being unwell etc and I hope someone may know something on this.
To everyone look the positive people on here may be wrong and the more sceptical correct. Everyone must make their own decision and not decry others who come to a different decision.
My decision is hold these shares!!!
Similar drilling costs but it’s like comparing a few puddles with an ocean.
Note Char’s quick dash to take an onshore licence. Must be scared of Predators first mover advantage.
GLA genuine holders.
Muckle
Don't think I was doing anything with TheBold but happy to be enlightened?!
Just suggesting one drill might be preferred over another and OHNYM ultimately holds the ace on permitting
TheBold in TheBin.
Injames, do you realise what you have just announced with the bold one on this BB !!
Good to note OHNYM had a 25% share in Chariots upcoming drill ' the 3 prospects total 74bcf.
Now, if I was the Moroccan government and looking at drilling priorities in the area I'd personally be tempted to prioritise Geurcif over Chariots drills. Hundreds of bcf potentially even greater than 1 TCF is a bit of a bigger prize.
Just what my thinking would be and believe we also have an option on the drill.
Added...
More fun than Easter Eggs 🥚 🪺 😋
Love to each and every one of you ❤️
Hartlefoolbob...
Should be Q1
Keithoz has again overlooked CHAR signed contract preceding PRD to drill two wells planned before end Q3 and Sound claiming they are next in line.
Cannot see how two (possible) three wells will be drilled and the rig moved before the exploration permit expires on the 5/6/24. Paul thinks it's on plan, CHAR thinks it's on their plan who is right?
Bold - Behave yourself lad!
I’m not interested in ramping one bit! Been around here long enough to be able to smell the bull!
I’m sure you mean well 😳
GLA
Where have i done that. ? I clarified i own 3 stocks on Morocco , PRD, CHAR and SOU
Trouble is you only want to hear ramping.. that’s fine . However I will post how i see it on all the stocks I hold with out you telling what i can and cannot do .