We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Well done you.
I seem to have had a post removed LOL!!
"The company had to raise funds, end of story." LOL!! As against producing something that they can actually sell!
"It’s a good job we live in the uk and not North Korea which means we’re entitled to freedom of speech!!!"
I don't think Chairman Whimax agrees. LOL.
It’s a good job we live in the uk and not North Korea which means we’re entitled to freedom of speech!!!
The nfx share price is cheap compared to previous years highs the question the investor has to ask is “is it cheap compared to next year’s price” that’s the risk we the investors have to take!! Imo it is
GLA
Not “everyone” Chab, just you, who as far back as I can remember has posted nothing but negativity, and now FFx.
In isolation, you’re pretty harmless with your sarcastic, pointless and negative one liners, but FFx is a little more dangerous as he’s capable of stringing a paragraph or 2 together. Trouble is, imo, those paragraphs are no more than negative guesswork and conspiracy theories, posted in response to almost every new thread or post.
Looking at his posts it’s as if he’s on a personal crusade to save every would be new investor from NFX and themselves, by continually reposting historical negativity about previous employees, taking cheap shots at the current BoD (one of whom is barely in the door) and just making up rest up, but with a negative slant.
I’m all for “asking the difficult questions” as he likes to put it, but what questions is he actually asking, and to whom? I don’t see any questions being asked by him at all, just negative answers. If he wants to go on a crusade and “get some answers” he should be asking and pestering the BoD until he gets the answers he wants (then post them on here if he wants), not making up theories on here 15 times a day, which have become tantamount to bashing the company
And putting “we need transparency” like some kind of political activist, at the end of his posts, won’t get the job done I’m afraid.
Soup, I wouldn't waste your breath. If he really thinks asking questions about how a company is being run is a bad thing and is tantamount to animosity then he is confused.
If he thinks that I am to blame for ex-directors driving a company from 15p a share down to 2p a share and transforming all the deals they said they had to a state that is 'immaterial', to leave and sell down their holdings without explanation, even jump across to work for one of the clients whose business is now lost us...then he is very confused.
I have a significant personal stake in this company. I will fully support and get behind any board that can prove to me that this kind of behaviour is firmly in the past and that they truly have the shareholders interests at heart. Until then, I will continue to ask questions.
As for having a problem with my posting style well there is always that filter option.
"negativity and animosity towards the company."
Rather like you regarding anyone else that has an opinion different to your own. You should really stop trying g to shoot people down that wish to say it as they see it. And your constant advice to sell if you're not in the happy clappy brigade is "starting" to get boring.
ATB
Apologies, my faux pas on that. However it doesn’t really alter my point(s) on his posting style, conspiracy theories or negativity and animosity towards the company.
Whimax you are missing the basic fact the FX is talking about current directors not ex-directors.
Lol.
Yes mate. Whatever you say mate.
I'm not going to get into a lengthy, boring argument with you again. I think most people can work out which camp you're really sit in.
Lol ffx “spoken like a real 2%”.
You have no idea mate. I’ve been here for 2 years+ and I’ve made 1 “trade” in that time (which was an in and out on the morning of news) where I made £270 or there about. Other than that I’ve not sold a single share, but added several times..
I’m not a trader and I I don’t post/ramp on Twitter (as you’ve intimidated before), but you’re constant attempts at looking for sticks to beat the company with are ridiculous and your guess work and negative conspiracy theories are becoming farcical.
The company had to raise funds, end of story. There are only a handful of ways they could have done it and they cannot control what happens after it’s been done, who holds their shares or who who sells them, and to whom. They cannot make holders produce a TR1, nor can they dictate who goes where and does what with whom after they have left the company. Wise up for ffs. I honestly don’t get why people like you with so much animosity towards a company continue to remain invested. Staggering!!
"What are they suppose to do exactly? "
Spoken like a true 2%er
They could have longer term faith in their investments.
With regards ex directors/employees moving to “competitors” they can really only limit that for a set period of time through a non-compete agreement. Even then, if someone breaks it, the costs involved in legal action probably isn’t worth the time or effort.
"It does make you wonder whether the last placing has done little more than attract veteran pump n dumpers with a little more cash to throw around than the usuals"
What are they suppose to do exactly? Presumably existing significant holders didn’t want to add to their positions and I didn’t hear many on here complaining that they weren’t offered a load at 2p (even if they/we/you did want more, there was an opportunity to buy at very close to the placing price just after it). Also, the cost of making a placing available to existing PI’s is cost prohibitive, particularly at the amount of money they are looking at raising.
The company needed cash. They can’t control what new shareholders are going to do with their new shares, so I think it’s high time people got over this.
I’ll await the usual replies about my ramping lol.
GL all.
Yes, I saw his 3 point plan for Anne on twitter yesterday.
I think we all share his frustrations that nothing came of that. Still lots of questions over management here. Why are two NEDs allowed to take positions in companies that appear to be potential competitors? Is this part of a wider plan for collaboration or is it just NED's looking after their own interests or working for 'the greater good of medical science' regardless of how it impacts the shareholders of the companies that they breeze through?
We need transparency.
Poor old Offshore, he's still banging on about Kissei after all this time.
"It does make you wonder whether the last placing has done little more than attract veteran pump n dumpers with a little more cash to throw around than the usuals"
It was and is as I suggested when the 70 million was announced; just another way for lth to be left treading water. Ever murkier water.
ATB
Still think Keegan will be fine as it is doubtful he could help them that quickly with a deal.
Interesting week and I still own the same number of shares as I did at the start of last year so its not me offloading.
Where is Hartlepool Bob after he topping up all those peas and carrots here?
Wonder when Gooding and Higgins will pull their fingers out and issue their TR1s they are required to do so.
Even without buying or selling they were due to do so weeks ago.
It does make you wonder whether the last placing has done little more than attract veteran pump n dumpers with a little more cash to throw around than the usuals.
That might explain the high volume without TR1's, unfortunately.
yeah FX, I was meaning those who buy and sell with a timescale of hours
I take it you mean the constant dumpers rather than little ole me and my critiques? :0)
Just in case there is any doubt, I do have the company's best interests at heart. My opinions are designed to help other shareholders to take a long hard look at the way things are being done. We need to ask questions of those we have entrusted our money to rather than just hope that their altruism knows no bounds. The last year was a cold, hard lesson in the reasons for that!
At the moment it doesn't feel like the shareholders have the best interests of the company in mind.