London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Well I take it back. I said the press wouldn't pick the story up at this stage. Delighted to have been wrong about that one.
" A Quantum Leap "
What for some may have seemed an impossible dream, is turning into reality.
Article in today’s times re Nanoco/Samsung:
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/c20d1ac8-d610-11ec-bb99-1bcd45646516?shareToken=502f19b152e91d7b01e59a8136cb2b95
Good take on the findings BeContrarian, that will very likely influence proceedings.
Yes I did. I got some at 37 and then a few more at 39. I really hope we are congratulating ourself for that decision in a few months Feeks.
I think Hawi is right and am not concerned by day to day price action. It’s clear to me which way this is headed and am sort of grateful it hasn’t gone wild to allow me to top up! Still, for what it’s worth I think the true significance of today is only really understood by the inner circle at this stage, whilst it stays that way it’s a buying op for sure.
I’ve also spent this evening reading through the judgment document. I must say I can decipher even less of this than the transcripts. However, It’s very encouraging to see that not only do they grant the patents, but in their written testimony, compliment the clarity of the patent owner arguments, in addition to really dismantling the Samsung case piece by piece. I can’t see the appeal having much legs to be honest.
Did you buy more Be contrarian? I did but woefully timed my purchase at 40 / 41p. I feel sure I will be selling those shares at a sizeable profit though.
feature on bloomberg law
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/tech-and-telecom-law/samsung-loses-bid-to-nix-nanoco-quantum-dot-tv-display-patents
Success in court relieves an existential threat, but it doesn't necessarily fix the revenue problem. Nanoco need to sell stuff on it's merits, rather than just recovering stolen property. We've been hoping for high volume licenses in display for years. Despite the likelihood of a handy lump sum, patent validity alone really only restores us back to where we were in terms of recurring revenue, i.e. very little. However, the SP may well drift up from here, not down, as we countdown to a sparklingly positive court case offering a mystery prize, likely bigger than anything the company has ever seen before. Alternatively, an out of court deal with Samsung, the sort of deal Nanoco proposed in the first place, could be the kickstart to a thriving business. The perfect scenario, though, would be doing a deal with one of Samsung's rivals, signed on the day they are hit with maximum damages in court
It's not exactly a bullish market and there's still some way to go with Samsung.
Hi All
I bought in today - held Nano a very long time ago .. I dont think the market caught on today - 47-0 slam dunk and would appear that the legal advise is that the judge will let this go straight to court .. Samsung may appeal but will be given very limited time to do so.. next one will be the court date, but will this go to court?
Today’s price action has really surprised me. I thought we would have doubled in price today. I would’ve expected 40p just on a split decision, let alone a slam dunk like this! It just goes to show that outside of our little bubble, people don’t really know too much about Nano’s legal battle and the implications of it.
Still, I am assuming most LTHs are being philosophical about it as we are here for the long haul for true value to be realised. Today is a good day.
over the next day or two/week or two.
Wouldn't want to have been a seller here though after today's fantastic news if a RNS suddenly appears tomorrow or next week or next month announcing Samsung have thrown in the towel and are looking to limit damages by making an out of court offer...or perhaps even a takeover bid?
What price this stock then you might wonder?
Certainly not 36p.