London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Hello all, it's been a while but i thought i would have a look in to see if this BB was still in existance, good luck with your future investmenta/gambles and i hope you make your money back somewhere else, ATB.
Imaginary shares ?
Is Kettle still harping on about proving ones share holding?
As I have said before, my shares are lost as far as I am concerned, any work the self opinionated group carries out benefits me as a share holder and all I need to do is sit on my hands and do nothing.
By law any changes ALL shareholders have to be made aware and as such I shall receive notice.
As some of us have also pointed out why would I join a group that I absolutely 100% disagree with the views of? Personally I voted for the New Co and have pointed out why I did, so no I am not going to prove or show my hand to any person or persons who voted against the deal! And now realise what a bunch of twonks they were for doing so! (in believing a small number of people who were giving them disinformation on here!)
If you are successful in your many months of negotiating with the board I shall be smiling as you have been working for me....like a bunch of little minions...with me doing nothing! So thanks in advance should you make me any money in the future, but, like others this has been written off by me!
Will I keep coming back here from time to time to have a laugh and rant, yes, just to annoy those who can't be named.
Now get back to discussions with the board and get back to making me money!
SteJ SteJ. Only one rule in ShareHolders Club. We don’t talk about Shareholders Cub. Lol
No handshake just proof of being a shareholder!
Can you do the secret handshake?
Appreciate I'm not part of the SHG, but has there been any contact with the BOD yet? Not after details, just if a conversation is happening or not
Quite clearly you needed to engage further, shame you could not prove your share holding. Bye
Kettle - " if i was so against the Shareholder group i would prove my share holding , call them all idiots and leave the group to make a point."
I don't think they're idiots and I'm not really into name-calling anyway.
If they think they can achieve anything from being in that group I hope they're right. But I have no reason to believe that's the case. I'm sorry Kettle but until you can prove otherwise I'm not willing to waste my time and engage with you any further.
I only know if i was so against the Shareholder group i would prove my share holding , call them all idiots and leave the group to make a point. Not pretend i own shares like all the idiot rampers/derampers we have to put up with across the share board.
Not an advocate for freedom of speech then, eh, Mr.Kettle !!
You probably fully support what's happening in Hong Kong and Belarus at the moment as well !!
Stalinism Rools OK !!
You would not know HSD as you are not willing to show you have shares.
Kettle - "The Club you HAVE to PROVE you actually hold shares before you can voice an opinion. If Lse did that it would save a lot of wasted speech."
There's not much left to have an opinion about.
The only announcement from the BoD will be ADMINISTRATION due to the losses after the failed RTO. Iclaprim is held elsewhere now and administration would end any potential value to Motif shareholders. Gold wants an end to this situation and will retain his reputation by blaming shareholders for voting down his wonderful RTO. Any other outcome can only be achieved by joining the SHAREHOLDERS group to have your say and a vote.
The Club you HAVE to PROVE you actually hold shares before you can voice an opinion. If Lse did that it would save a lot of wasted speech.
Jackdaw.... absolutely right, if , at some point in time, a new proposal is put forward by the BoD on the future of Motif, then ALL shareholders will be eligible to vote, not just those that are members of the 'Little Boys Club'
GLA
Yes your right so the more true shareholders {proof required } the better. There are some OUCH stories on large holdings and losses but you will have to join to read them but a nice positive honest group.
I'm not a lawyer but, surely, if there are any votes that affect the future of any incipient company, wouldn't the Actual Shareholders Group be entitled and required to vote??
missthepenny62 - "At least the SAG might be able to get some answers on how it was all handled so badly, from not sorting the issues that triggered the NRL to the awful nature of the proposed RTO deal."
I don't even think it was handled badly.
I'm pretty sure the medical community simply weren't aware until a few years ago that some gram-positive antibiotics could cause liver damage. They had no reason to think it could cause a problem, so they weren't concerned about it. That would explain why the FDA didn't need that data until it was too late.
As for the RTO deal, we were offered the same price for our shares that they were worth at the start of last year. That doesn't seem unfair to me.
If the rest of the group don't think these points are relevant I really don't see what I'd have to gain from joining them.
Hi all,
Just mailed Alan with a screenshot of my now delisted shares. Sort of scary how £41k can finally disappear in just a line on a text like that.
Looking forward to learning something along the way with the SAG - although perhaps am still a bit too angry with both myself and the company to be of much use at the moment!
I really don't see the point in any bickering here. What's happened has happened. At least the SAG might be able to get some answers on how it was all handled so badly, from not sorting the issues that triggered the NRL to the awful nature of the proposed RTO deal.
GLA.
It’s not secretive proof of shares means you can vote, if you cant vote no point in you joining. If someone was new to all this it would be a great process to be in and learn a little.
Disappointing FDA decision killed this, who's to blame, the BOD or the FDA? Everything was going great guns until the 'NO'
Is there any point to being that secretive??
You wont see it because you cannot prove your share holding, just trying to get information from us on what is happening. Nice Try HSD.
Dote59 "you could join the many in the Shareholder Action Group who have all had to prove they are shareholders and with decent leadership"
Thanks. I'll join as soon as I see some proof of that 'decent leadership' claim.