We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
It's been the same for three of four years. Results as expected even blasting targets at times. The BOD have bought an asset off themselves in Krunch and paid themselves rent while saying their salaries are low. This has caused disastrous placing after placing. If it was not for Krunch 2 or 3 placings could have been avoided. It's been a nonsense to date but of course it's going to turn around this time clown.
Thanks Citytilidie. That all makes sense. Its certainly looking like there is a great deal of potential and the company is in financially great shape.
Exactly, "Profitable on a monthly basis" is what caught my eye. MOS is a very hard one to read as on the face of it there is huge promise but the BOD have diluted both the share price and confidence with some of their decisions to date. Still sounds an interesting business model if they get it right, which is why I'm still invested...
Good luck, Brighty
So no positives then System ? - good try.
That’s a fair point Techno but as previously posted the opportunities are very far reaching for what the company already has in place such as livescores.
If you read into the RNS they make reference to livescores, that database is huge and I would suspect that business will be an affiliate of Bet and therefore receive income as result - research shows that is somewhere between 20 to 30% of losses in a defined period along with an initial take up payment.
Given that MOS now has one of the best operating platforms through WAT along with specialist marketing it’s not hard to see how Bet could appeal to just that database alone which is of course sports based.
I would point you back to this which is published on the MOS website.
https://www.mobilestreams.com/pdf/MOS-RevenueStreams-2024030301.pdf
This is in addition of course to the NFT loyalty program also mentioned in the RNS - wonder what this could be?
As you say - very cheap at these low levels for new investors or those looking to average down.
Cash burnt before raises over 800k in the s6 months. Watch the intangibles which increase the profits. MOS have a habit of writing these off later when the thing doesn't work out. Skillful to hide costs in intangibles for now.
Nothing unexpected and the main positives I take from them are:
1) Cash is approx £1.2m (407 + 337 + 115 + 330 + 25 = 1214, against a market cap of £2.7m)
2) "We remain on track to reach operational profitability on a monthly basis during this year"
In terms of a negative I would like to understand a little more on the progress of the new venture which I think is a reasonable comment.
In summary assuming they are making good progress on the betting venture (there will be a large range of opinions here no doubt) then at this price it looks like a good "bet".
Good luck all.
Thanks for the honesty Lothbury - hopefully Amtech, System and the other members of their crew feel the same way that’s if they are invested of course ?
Good evening City. The chance of getting to break even is slim but if I had the opportunity to get out at b/e… I would be onto my Brokers asap (I expect many other longer term shareholders probably would like to get out at b/e and invest in a different company.). After this debacle I am happy to sell my shares and the gazillions of capital gains to someone else.
So Lothbury with your vast corporate experience in investing etc you’ll be selling up when you get to break even although the price will rising and Bet alongside other things starts to prove itself……just to be clear obviously.
I reckon there is plenty left for you, Lothbury, System and Buger.
One things for sure, I certainly won’t be eating humble pie as you’ve scoffed it all.
When (if) it comes good ::: SELL..
Think you might be getting a bit nervous about BET Amtech - just what are you and your crew going to do when it all comes good ?
Let’s face it ME’s just created another failure in Mexico for investors, just the same as all the other ‘get rich quick schemes’ he’s come up with. City must weight 45 stone after all the humble pie he’s eaten on all these failures.
ME was supposed to be doing a Q&A in The Hive telegram group in January, it was put back to February, then March and now April. There is obviously nothing to say/tell shareholders. If you had news you would not be cryptic about it, you would shout it from the rafters for everybody to hear so placings and raises would not be necessary as investors would be attracted here.
Looking forward to what humpy dumpy has to say on the next zoom call.
The BOD are supposed to join the dots for the investor instead of being cryptic. They so badly tried to ramp the price based on little substance in the past. If there was something to shout about they would be. It's a new project which supposedly has so many rushing to MOS to work with them on BET. If you believe that spin you are a fool as they would not have to raise if this was the case. There would be strategic investment pouring in. Instead the investor is the mug. BET is already assuming it will be a success but the likely outcome will be a flop.
as previously stated i do genuinely respect peoples comments - i won’t hide and have made my feelings clear to the bod - i’m a realist and accept the that things haven’t gone to plan but has it for many other companies - look at aim, it’s a ****show and has been since covid, many many gone to the wall leaving pi’s with nothing - bod not bothered, look at bids as an example or gfin having sold off there main asset ?
hasn’t been plain sailing at all, mistakes made, people saying it’s a sham and jollies everywhere ? - i’ve not seen sham company where the chairman’s family invest a lot of money or where the bod get paid in shares ?
they take huge salaries !
they have kept going and now imo they have hit the right opportunity, read into it what you will but you ignore this opportunity at your peril, i have bought a few more but not many.
i am here for the end game as i have always stated and now it’s clear to see.
let’s see what the coming weeks and months bring !
if it’s all gone to 💩 at the end of the year then i’ll be the first to eat humble pie and hold my hands up.
Walking the dog in the dark.. a bit like buying shares in MoS 🤦🏻
And apologies for the poorly written message. Walking the dog in the dark.
I did join the dots. And this board are all in cahoots with one another with their associates and companies.
Give it time, and one of them will get a lump sum for “ proprietary software”.
This share is a dog I’m afraid, and the board need ousting for incompetence
They can’t even make up their me nd what the. Business model is, it’s USP is that they keep changing there mind. Hahaha.
I literally have NO inside information but I join the dots - it’s all in the public domain you just need to look for it.
Yet I keep buying shares Scotty ? 🤔 how does that work exactly ?
Knows different.
= has inside information.
Or else it should be public knowledge…
So you either need to spill your guts, or we get to drag the company through it, finding it out. As I’m pretty sure insider info is frowned upon.
Right?