We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
b1gdeano Bitcoin hasn't been hacked. Other blockchains have, predominantly because every other blockchain are centralised and so open to getting attacked.
Exchanges getting is no different to Banks getting hacked or robbed. You do not need to use an exchange to obtain Bitcoin or sell it if you so wish.
The idea that Bitcoin is for the black market is a complete misnomer. Cash is the transaction of choice for criminals (not just talking govts, big business and institutions) Cash transactions are completely private if not done in a public space and once transacted there is no history. Bitcoin transactions - every single one of them, regardless of size - is logged on the Bitcoin blockchain and visible forever and open for anyone in the world to see. It is literally the least good form of value transfer for illicit activity.
Of course it has value, I can go to an exchange, OTC desk or privately transact and sell a single Bitcoin for $8700 today and similarly buy one, the value being $8,700.
Very true.
But bitcoin isn't the Messiah. Just like CP it just a very naughty boy.
And while blockchain hasn't been hacked there has been many hacks at exchanges, or trusted third parties, that have resulted in theft of bitcoin.
I'm of the theory that bitcoin is nothing but fluff and driven by the black market. It has no value.
Slugmum Bitcoin is backed by the proof of work of millions of computers and the most cryptographically secure network the world has ever seen and open source protocol all of which is fully decentralised and audited every nano second . Bitcoin transactions consist of numbers and letters. Nobody buys CD's anymore they have digitised music on electronic devices (numbers and letters), airplanes fly in the sky without operator (pilot) intervention down to a series of 1's and 0's. Your Tally account is just numbers on your app, you believe that Tally hold gold which is represented by the Tally token of account, there has been no disclosed audit - so what makes you think there is any gold, you know not where it is held - if anywhere, you know not the legal lien on the gold - undisclosed for a reason !! You give your money to Tally without proof of Gold. You swap your fiat for a number represented in mystical "tally". Tally are a trusted third party and as everyone knows "trusted third parties are security holes" and what better to prove this but the case of Lionsgold who investors trusted with their money and got in return a piece of paper (share certificate) which is no longer tradable.
Bitcoin value has grown from zero to circa $8,700 today with no advertising, no CEO, no interventionist monetary policy, no down time and has never been hacked. For this reason millions have adopted it and it now has the best cryptographers, quants, developers and computer scientists in the world working on it.
Tally has Ralph Hazel and Cameron Parry and has already been hacked and software issues including the most critical financial failing of all - Double Spend, hence why after months and months it only has circa 1,000 downloads of which there are likely only 10% active users. This is the hard truth.
They are using the letter of the LAW...to legally nick our money...
.....downright (insert your own expletive) fraud
Yes bigbench even a buyout at say 100m is pocket change to the likes of google.
At time of delist 13m mcap considering dilution etc that could mean in region of 6x -8x from suspension price.
What other challenger currencies are there? I dont know of any, we are direct competition to governments and fiat money, I believe someone somewhere will want to pick this up and run with it.
Don’t say bitcoin because it’s not backed by anything, most crypto’s are speculation and not backed by anything
All we do is wait. That is all we need to do. Picardy stinks of desperation now. Who tries to deramp a delisted share, honestly. I emailed CP recently and he responded in a kind, methodical but realistic manner which put my mind is at rest (we are on the same page for the prospects of Tally and wider assets evidently). Nice chap who is working hard to make this a success for SHs.
Sell out to these lot... they got deep pockets!
google plans to offer checking accounts next year
Google is planning to offer checking accounts within its Google Pay app, The Wall Street Journal reports. Its “Cache” project, which could launch as soon as next year, will be offered in partnership with Citigroup and a small Stanford University credit union. Google says that the accounts will be branded up front as coming from these banks, which will handle the financial backend and regulatory compliance.
© Illustration by Alex Castro / The Verge
Google executive Caesar Sengupta told the WSJ that the initiative is designed to “help more people do more stuff in a digital way online,” and he noted that the service could be used to offer loyalty card programs. The publication also notes that checking accounts contain a huge amount of valuable data about consumer spending as well as information about how much people earn. Google, however, has been quick to claim that it won’t sell checking account financial data to advertisers, and it added that it doesn’t currently use Google Pay data for advertising purposes.
In recent years, big tech companies have been increasingly interested in pushing into financial services. Earlier this year, Apple launched a credit card, the Apple Card, in partnership with Goldman Sachs, and Facebook announced Libra, a cryptocurrency it’s attempting to launch with a collection of other tech and finance companies. Just yesterday, Facebook announced Facebook Pay, a service for sending money over the company’s social networks and app. Even Amazon has reportedly investigated offering checking accounts to teens.
These initiatives have already created big problems for the companies that are offering them. Apple’s credit card is being investigated for discriminating against women, and earlier this month, almost half a dozen companies dropped out of Facebook’s Libra Association, as regulators grow increasingly wary of the planned cryptocurrency. This push into financial services also arrives as the world is coming to terms with the privacy implications of concentrating so much user data in the hands of a small number of tech giants.
At the same time as Silicon Valley’s tech giants move into financial services, a number of smaller tech-focussed banks have started to emerge, including Revolut and Monzo, the latter of which launched in the US earlier this year. Left in the middle, traditional banks could soon start to feel the squeeze.
The previous high of approx 6.75p would do me!
They can have mine for ANY price..i've just got to get the money into something progressive. 2yrs here for nothing is beyond inglorious...it's downright f/ckg fraud ?
I may be having a funny optimistic turn here BUT has nobody else considered that perhaps the company could be undertaking a fundraising and could then buy up existing shareholders current shareholdings and keep the company private ?? It would be on par with their bedfellows at Railsbank and Starling Bank who remain private companies and would take the heat off them to re-list and give them far greater autonomy in what they wish to do ultimately. It would make total sense so long as they could raise the funds necessary, and after all they know full well most holders are desperate to get out of this disaster and move on.
I for one would be fully supportive. Kind of makes sense as to why they are always trying to establish investors shareholdings.