London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Source for ANTAQ Decision:
https://www.in.gov.br/web/dou/-/acordao-n-628-antaq-de-26-de-outubro-de-2021-355507496
Page 70 - top right
https://seadantigo.portal.ap.gov.br/diario/DOEn7528.pdf?ts=21102907
https://setrap.portal.ap.gov.br/
https://seadantigo.portal.ap.gov.br/diario/DOEn7528.pdf?ts=21102907
Would tha be "in the period from 25 to 29/10/2021." then
Oh ,,,,,, Whats todays date.!!!!!!
Of course
ORDINANCE NO. 237/2021-SETRAP
The SECRETARY OF STATE OF TRANSPORT OF THE GOVERNMENT OF AMAPÁ, in the use of his duties conferred on him by Decree No. 0795, of 03/26/2018,
R E S O L V E:
Art. 1º- DESIGNATE the servers listed below, to travel from the Headquarters of their duties Macapá / AP, to the Municipality of Serra do Navio, in order to carry out inspection and inspections of buildings, sheds and equipment of the Railway Terminals of the Railway of Amapá - EFA, in the period from 25 to 29/10/2021.
@EV_
Have you found the ANTAQ equivalent for the Railway yet ?
Mentioned in Diario do Amapa - 28/10/21
https://www.diariodoamapa.com.br/cat/blogs/paulo-silva/
Change of control
The National Waterway Transport Agency granted an application to change the corporate control of the company ZAMIN AMAPÁ BRASIL SA, currently called DEV MINERAÇÃO SA, holder of Adhesion Contract 91/2015, to the company PEDRA BRANCA ALLIANCE PTE. LTDA, controlled by INDO SINO TRADE PTE. LTDA. AND CADENCE MINERALS PLC, under the condition of settlement of debts with the regulatory agency within a period of up to 30 days after the completion of the corporate reorganization, under penalty of loss of effectiveness of the authorization act.
Amapá at COP26
Narson Galeno, state attorney general, and Eduardo Corrêa Tavares, secretary of Planning, will be Amapá's representatives at COP26, from November 2nd to 11th, to be held in Glasgow, Scotland.
Indeed, indeed @Bannor, indeed. ;-)
.... there are those here who should know better than to engage with idiots (unless it's purely for sport & a wind up of course as I'm occasionally wont to do myself :-) )
but regardless the mention of Cadence/Indo/PBA as taking over control & management in court issued documents is no bad thing ... it appears to be happening & seems to be a WHEN now & no longer an IF .....as it has for some time in my opinion ..... but that as usual is only my opinion :-))
Morning most :-))
This is good news. Share price should react positively.
Exciting times ….
*principal… (left in charge)…
Thanks tc, it’s been quite a revealing day one way or another..
for pba to have corporate control over dev… they would need to own dev shares… wouldn’t they… the confusing bit is why the nwta would acknowledge and grant this… maybe they have been controlling dev previously… as a principle creditor of some sort… hence why they have given us 30days after transfer… for dev to specifically settle it’s debts with the nwta… it’d be a coincidence if that’s about $3.5m…
Clear as mud then —-
knew it was it…
Knew what Tommy?
i knew it…
I think this adds a lot more detail than we knew last week @MLQ.
Haha exactly.
Let me try @Obs:
An extraordinary general meeting (EGM) is a shareholder meeting called other than a company's scheduled annual general meeting (AGM).
Party: DEV MINERACAO S.A. - IN JUDICIAL REORGANIZATION IN JUDICIAL REORGANIZATION (06.030.747/0003-30), ZAMIN AMAPA BRASIL S.A., PEDRA BRANCA ALLIANCE PTE. LTD.
Summary: Request for transfer of corporate control. Approval subject to the settlement of debts. Judgment: Having seen, reported and discussed these records, the Directors of the National Waterway Transport Agency agree, gathered for the 511th Ordinary Meeting of the Collegiate Board, held on 10/20/2021, for the reasons explained by the Rapporteur, in: I - acknowledge and grant the application for change in the corporate control of the company ZAMIN AMAPÁ BRASIL SA, currently named DEV MINERAÇÃO SA, holder of Adhesion Agreement No. 91/2015, to the company PEDRA BRANCA ALLIANCE PTE. LTD, controlled by INDO SINO TRADE PTE. LTD. AND CADENCE MINERALS PLC, under the condition of settlement of debts with this Regulatory Agency within 30 (thirty) days after the completion of the corporate reorganization, under penalty of loss of effectiveness of this authorizing act; II - notify the National Secretariat of Ports and Waterway Transport about this decision, in order to assess the convenience and opportunity of keeping in force the Adhesion Agreement No. 91/2015, since the recommendation contained in item IV of Judgment No. 154-2020-ANTAQ, in view of the potential benefits associated with the resumption of operations at the terminal; and III – inform the interested parties about this decision. The Rapporteur, General Director Eduardo Nery, Director Adalberto Tokarski and Director Flávia Morais Takafashi participated in the deliberation.
Indeed @EV. Pretty much confirms what the EGM is for doesn't it? Or does it need spelling out ;-)
@MLQ published today
https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/diarios/1153809890/dou-secao-1-28-10-2021-pg-51
for once I partially agree with you booobla, I did perhaps jump to conclusiions, only my holdings or a least the ones I purchased as a top up have been declared, so I'm open to be ridiculed when the the opportunity arises grasp it - and your position is?
you won't say because you can't face people knowing why you are so bitter, seems to go right back to David Lenigas.
Seems it's consumed you, very sad.
@EV_ This is just the comfirmation of your recently shared findings 8 or so days ago.
" resumption of operations at the terminal"
Well it's certainly possibly @jimb, but there are many steps towards us taking 20%, some we get to hear about others not so much...