We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
ALL:
Here's our chance to settle whether BP has aliases. His comments below got 7 Recommends. Please identifiy yourself if you recommended? I'm sure no offense will be taken - just trying to prove a point ..........
Don't worry, if and when I get my exit point (here's hoping), I might well stick around.
Do INFA's directors enjoy a round of golf? I believe the courses in Florida are quite something...
Whatamess this topic is! Blair***** is likely Lisa ?
If that was true then BP cannot possibly (claim to) hold 56K of shares! Since the BOD takeover there have been a string of different 'protestors' here in different disguises. IMHO everything that BP states, and the way in which he constantly undermines progress and sentiment here, makes me firmly believe BP has underhand motives and cannot be trusted. Just my two cents.......
A protester who has only ever posted in support of IslandMagee (and against H&W)?
OK...
Stifler I dont believe BlairWitch is a paid de-ramper but worse a protester that won't stop whats coming and only thing they can do now is wind investors up !! Better to just green bin them for recycling ??
Do you get paid per word?
Nobody really cares BP, only you mate.
Here's hoping you get your entry point.
Speedy_Gonzalez,
Don't worry, if and when I get my exit point (here's hoping), I might well stick around.
Do INFA's directors enjoy a round of golf? I believe the courses in Florida are quite something...
Speedy you are replying to someone I filtered long ago for talking rubbish and being a purposeful deramper. BP is not interested in having a good faith discussion, I suggest you do the same
BP.
When YOU say, "I hold only 2 dogs in my portfolio - one of which is INFA", you highlight WHY you are held in disdain on this forum.
Personally, I will be glad when you break even, leave and STOP KICKING THIS DOG!
Speedy_Gonzalez,
I have only ever one post to be deleted that was when a new poster, assuming my name, proceeded to post a blatant and non-informed post in my user-name.
This was quickly acknowledged, and deleted, by the moderators - to their immense credit.
BP. It seems you suffer a selective memory when it suits you. I clearly recall the tone of your past abusive posts aimed at JW and others. Those cannot be viewed as they were reported then deleted. I'm sure there are many others here with a hefty loss on their investment but you seem to stand out as the most vocal regarding infas business practices and indebtedness. Is this the best way to hightlight the companys prospects or perhaps to encourage others to invest / raise their stakes, and maybe recoup your losses?
Perhaps, if you have an axe to grind, you should write to an 'agony Aunt' for advice? Personally, I look forward to the day you break even and leave us all in peace!
Si_Derman,
Thank you. As stated below, I continue to maintain my position in INFA.
Despite the continual abuse that I receive here, I have never reciprocated, although I did question stokey12's grasp of the English language, simply because many of his/her/their posts are so muddled as to be unintelligible. The same could be said of others', to be fair...I have never stated that INFA is not currently revenue-generating, merely that the use of the term "revenue-generating", in this context is, at best, disingenuous.
Similarly, unlike many other frequent posters on this board, I have never predicted a movement in the share price of INFA, either positive or negative; in my view, that way madness lies.
My criticisms have always lain at the door of the directors, who, I maintain, are entirely self-serving and whose actions certainly do not align with the interests of shareholders. The continued absence of the marine licence for IslandMagee, given the arrogance on public display from the board at the end of 2018 and the beginning of 2019, when INFA's share price rocketed (as a result of a blatant pump-and-dump campaign on social media, involving a former TR1 holder) can only be put down to either incompetence or, to be politely euphemistic, "mis-information." Neither instills confidence.
I do not recall making any reference to JW's "shaft" - though I will state that his history as a phoenix (of which, I admit, I was ignorant until it was posted here), his "amusing" recent bonus and the payment by INFA for services to a company owned by our erstwhile CEO, make me inclined to suggest that he may be carrying out a "shafting" of his own...
I suspect my professional knowledge and experience of shipyards and of the wider shipping industry surpass that of most who post on this forum; it is on this basis that I continue to add my own thoughts.
As to why I continue to hold (yes, Speedy_Gonzalez, I continue to hold), I have also stated here in the past that my own investment philosophy is never to sell at a loss. Not the most efficient of plays, I acknowledge, but I hold only 2 dogs in my portfolio - one of which is INFA (the other having dropped out of the FTSE100 not long ago, so at the other end of the risk/investment spectrum).
Let the insults commence...
Speedy, it was actually 57,000, allowing for the 100:1 consolidation. ;)
So +/-60,000 would be consistent with what was previously stated.
Just sayin'
Correction: BPs comments
Tailor. You'd be wise to ignore BPs here......everyone else does!
Blairpeach. Is that another fib you're saying, "I maintain my -/+ 60,000"? I recall you stating much less than that when Si_derman was taking a shareholder tally some months ago. Guess that follows you're previous comments about us LTHs stroking JWs shaft........
Tailor,
I remember the post to which you refer.
Your apology is accepted.
My apologies if im wrong but I can definitely remember the post you got removed because you were insulting a very good and informative real investor and in that post you thanked him because you had sold your shares and bought into another company... ill not ask why your so negative about a company your supposedly invested in because that just gives you fuel for your agenda !
Good luck everyone and thank you very much to all the genuine investors and thanks for all the information yous have been providing, Exciting times
Tailor028, apologies for mis-spelling your user name.
Trailor028,
You appear to be another of INFA's confused. I maintain my +/-60,000 holding.
INFA on the other hand is a much less mature company, achieved maiden revenues shortly ago, numerous projects in the pipeline, great management team, and is progressing forward. Bab**** is just a big bloated blue chip that's mostly heard about in the news when one of its big contracts goes belly up
Bab**** being up 29% isn't impressive if you look at the 3 year or 5 year price for it. I should imagine their long term holders are somewhat pleased, but if you bought in around those highs then it has a long way to go.
Yes thought you had gone,all the better for holding on if you did gl.
BlairPeach if I remember one of your last post you have claimed to have sold up ... So why are you still posting negative comments??