We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
https://www.infrastrataplc.com/statement-triumph-subsea-services-triumph/
https://www.infrastrataplc.com/statement-triumph-subsea-services-triumph/
TheEast In relation to your 09.03 post as I understand it Triumph are saying that there should be an EGM over this issue. Such an EGM should only be called if there is a motion to vote on otherwise what is the point of having an EGM. As Triumph have stated that they will not do business with INFA I cannot see what an EGM would achieve. If the members were to vote to require the BoD to resume discussions with Triumph Triumph have said they will not do business with INFA.
If the EGM was not a realistic proposition you would have to wonder why Triumph even suggested it. Also it questions Triumph's motivations in making the suggestion.
With these risible director buys, are they deliberately driving down the share price?
It looks like quite a large seller clearing here, about 400,000 last friday followed by more today, shareholders here have been very poorly treated IMO and I am very Pi""ed off with the board, pump up the SP to facilitate a further fundraise, I would not be buying here, just deciding whether to sell and chalk it up to poor research on my behalf, but am finding it hard to see any sort of SP uplift this year. Roly, the SP chart says it all.
stokey12,
Claims of this magnitude cannot go unanswered. Currently, the BoD stand guilty by omission.
There are three possible scenarios:
Blatant share-price manipulation;
Utter incompetence;
Just couldn't be @rsed.
Pick your poison.
we are almost 50% below recent placing price!
whats been happening here?
good time to buy now i suppose?
I disagree Stokey.
If the claims made by Triumph carry some truth, then big questions need answering.
If there claims are not true, then their statement is probably libellous and I'd fully expect there to be a robust defence by INFA.
Instead we have a 10% drop this morning. Spiffing
mcadder In relation to your 08.31 post that would be fine if people would accept any statement from INFA. I suspect that unless the statement basically agrees with what Triumph says people would not accept it so nothing would have been achieved.
Nope the Irish sea had an up-to-date gas pipeline to an up-to-date refinery and distribution site in Stranraer which is linked to northern Ireland ready to pump hydrogen from the caverns to main land Britain and just a little bit more the government decide on whether they going to build a bridge across firm Ireland to Scotland this week I think no infrastructure cost there I think for infra like centica imho
People saying "just move on" when it comes to the issue of what Triumph have alleged last week but to me the issue needs addressing by the bod instead of remaining silent while just buying small extra token amounts of shares as the share price keeps dropping...
In that case, it makes perfect sense. And thank you for agreeing with me.
It takes one to know one. ;)
Fair enough.I have not updated my holdings spreadsheet in quite a while so couldn't cross check it against known holdings from RNS's. Not sure on their sources ,tbh. Was given the link a while back on another stock where holders were sharing similar info and at the time it seemed to tally with what others thought to be a true and accurate account.
But always worth double checking, hey. :)
In relation to your 17.57 post it is more for those odd occasions when someone has posted more than once on the same topic and you are responding to a particular post it is clear which one you are posting. Of course you are right I am just odd.
Si_Derman In relation to your 17.42 post I do not think that is the problem as the Morningstar page you provided does not include Killick and Co. It may be other major shareholders that it has not mentioned as it depends on the source of their information.
FWIW Stokey, I find it a very an unantural way to have a conversaton. Which is in essence what we are doing. If it was in response to something way down in a thread or indeed another thread, from yesterday or last week, then fair enough. But not in response to the previous post or something two minutes ago. Nah, that's just a bit odd. TBH
BUT, you do you. :)
Maybe they don't actually want to update it, purposely, as it looks to me that they have lost about 50% of the II's holdings.
Capdevila11 As you clearly have a problem with how I write my posts do feel free to filter me I will not be offended. I have no intention of changing how I write my posts as it is done to assist other people to find the posts I am responding to. I suspect that other people on the board amusing that I go to the trouble of identifying my posts I am responding to. You are the only problem who complains so I can only presume that it is a you problem.
Si_Derman Thanks for your 16.49 post and the link. If this information is correct it would seem to imply there is only one notifiable major shareholder. My point about the significant shareholder list on the company website is that as I understand it under the AIM rules this information is supposed to be updated at least every six months. It is a worry if the company administration is unable to do something so easy.
On another point If you click on the valuation tab that makes interesting reading.
This is more up to date Stokey
https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/20907/html/
Click on the institutions tab as it's set to funds.
Depends where you look, Stokey. You don't have to wait for Infa to update. :)
Here you go LG. As of the 30th of June.
https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/xlon/infa/ownership
Just seen this https://t.co/qqcvvmqp8d?amp=1
Chitta123 In relation to your 12.26 post the question is not funding. The issue is how much trouble the local opposition will make. From the documents oldtramp has posted in relation to the energy policy I am confident that the Marine License will be granted. However, I am also reasonable sure that any positive decision on the marine license will be subject to a legal challenge which will further delay matters. How long such a delay will be is what is uncertain.