We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Well chrishutch - I was not going to say anything but I so agree with you. I did my final top up yesterday morning of 30,000 shares by further reducing my current account buffer & rearranged my finances in the afternoon pre possible Brexit.My rearranged finances gave me a small cash flow advantage so I decided to add a further 270,000 shares taking me to 2m but none of this would have been possible without the help of those who have been part of bringing the SP so low so I thank them.I am still feeling very positive about the 'Good ship INFA' & expect a x2 or x3 increase in the SP this year.Good luck to all long termers.
I have to say the protestors and the vocal people on twitter have done me a real favour here. I would not have bought anywhere near as many shares had they not driven the price down so much. Sure the summer slowness and low volume has also played a part but they really helped.
When the market turns and it will turn - the chance to buy shares down here will be gone very fast and lots will miss out on this massive opportunity.
Hi Dawski or should I say man with many straw hats!? I apologize for harping on about our polite, informed visitor earlier. I felt I had to reveal the true motives and two-facedness. The matter is now closed. FB, I don't go there. Onwards and upwards.........Good weekend all!
Hi,Speedy/Whata****up --Have myself looked at Twitter and other sources and I have to say that I agree with you as am concerned that whereas all may be swetness and honey here it may not be so elsewhere at all --best probably not to give further air to this thread in the circumstances and thank you ever so much for drawing attention ...always remememer that all posts here are monitored and stored for future reference especially on FBook .As you say ..best to ignore,not upset anybody ...and,most important ,stay calm and focussed on the future!!
Whatamess. Just to clarify what sort of person Leesadee is and her motives here............
I had previously blocked her and her band of protesters on Twitter. However, I made a response to someone else on the #INFA tag and I just noticed a reply to my comments from who else, but Leesadee. Here it is............
Leesadee@Leesadee_Imagee·
Aug 12
Speedy, #INFA in process of HOPING to secure final marine license, & do you really think this is the only issue? So much more has been dug up...Our protests & challenges will only end when this project is stopped & we're all here for as long as it takes...
It's odd but her tone on twitter, in view of her protesting buddies, seems to be much more "in your face" than here. Or perhaps that is the real Leesa and not the polite, pleasant, well informed NON-SHAREHOLDER here??!!
Leesa. Who you are, where your from do not concern me. But when you appear here "trying to take money from my pocket" because you object to this project......then I take exception. Of course you are entitled to your opinions and I would probably welcome them IF YOUR WERE A SHAREHOLDER on this forum like most if not all others here! You show no shortage of arrogance to assume that people here need your help in researching the project. I will happily accept Snowmans posts, even if incomplete (as YOU say) than the biased advice of someone who wishes the project to fail, and all of us shareholders to lose our investment! Please take the hint.............
!.Avyererdowt, an interesting connection you made!
2. As ever, hail Dawski.
Setanta
All red herring stuff! JW has assured us that all correct procedures are being followed and that "as a EU project of common interest( the project) is enitled to to receive expeditrd time frames in relation to licencing and permitting. So that's quite enough about that!
Factually correct and I agree as I have stated on here many times. I keep on reiterating, why would you grant a draft license in the first place to an applicant, the applicant then meets and exceeds all your requirements but then is refused the full license? On what grounds? it would be a pointless excercise and as I keep repeating a total waste of everyones time, money, and expertise.
Therefore the license is a non issue for me, I just think it's been made out to be an issue by those opposing the project and to a certain extent the manipulators in the market. Hence the silly drop in the sp, added to the delay this year and the placings.
September is around the corner, the action will begin then leading up the year end IMO!
Have a good weekend all, off to the sucker now!!
Mr T
Hi, dear old friend,Setanta .... join us all typing madly away this gloomy p.m...Am glad that you have "popped" up to join the frantic postings here today ..may even reach 50 posts !!
Anyhow just to say that I am in touch with JW .He has not taken much if any holiday as far as I know .He has been busy all week as you can imagine .. many meetings and lots happening as I keep saying.
Hi Speedy, I use exactly the same name here as I do on Twitter so you & most others know exactly who I am, one of my first posts here was to respond to a welcome as a resident from one of your fellow posters, so I’ve never hidden who I am or my views on this project. When you DYOR I maybe I wrongly assumed you look at both the positives & potential negatives of a project before investing (& of course you should take financial advice from Money Saving Expert, who wouldn’t)....I posted last night because Snowman was nearly correct on process, but not quite, so I added some factual info that you should all be aware of...
Go well Speedy (& thanks Dawski)
in the past two days we've had about 30 posts here and 26 of those have been related to the marine licence,(including some fairly pointless posts as to whether Leesadee as a non investor should be posting here .Of course she should if she wants to.).
All red herring stuff! JW has assured us that all correct procedures are being followed and that "as a EU project of common interest( the project) is enitled to to receive expeditrd time frames in relation to licencing and permitting. So that's quite enough about that!
I'm far more interested in why the SP has declined so dramatically and in when it may turn itself around.
The initial phase of the reverse was brought about by manipulators in and around March 2019. A secondary phase was initiated by the last placement which was clearly flipped, as was the previous one. Currently, I believe the same group of manipulators are ensuring ,through their interventios,that the SP will not rise- for the time being. When they are ready it wii rise!
INFA is due EU grant money. It is due the appointment of a new chairman. It is due agreement with Equity and Debt partners. None of these important steps wll take place in August. It's the holidays, don't you know. I suspect that even JW is taking a rest.
But we are getting closer. So stop moidering about the marine licence and just concentrate on the SP machinations. That's the real music!!
Leesa. My answers to your comments are in BOLD:
Lol Speedy I've never hidden who I am, even that post states "for transparency", I'm upfront, honest, post links to facts & try to help with balance, which may not be appreciated by you, but others are maybe willing to look at all arguments & make informed choices...
YOUR FIRST POST ON THIS FORUM WAS MAY 3RD. 22 POSTS, HIGHLIGHTING MOSTLY NEGATIVE SENTIMENT, LATER YOU REVEALED "YOUR TRANSPARENCY."
IF I were investing money I would want to look at all available information before committing to supporting a project, wouldn't you?
HOW MANY SHARES DO YOU HOLD? THANKS FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION BUT IF I WANT FINANCIAL ADVICE LIKE YOURS I'LL LOOK AT THE MONEY SAVING EXPERT WEBSITE!
Last one just issued !! Mike
Well " she" ( not that gender really matters at all as it should ) certainly has whipped up interest in this board which usually goes quiet approaching and during the weekend.
Whilst L is a most determined protaganist and some members fairly say that she should not appear here I do not object as I have always found her posts measured,erodite, and politely offered.Unlike others which are totally unacceptable in all respects
I do not agree with some of her facts at all but she does present an opposing reasoned view and should not be dismissed willy nilly. At least she is apparently NOT part of the vitriol and darn right rudeness of others
I am here for the Long Term like Snowman and all you others ..I did my research and D.D. before investing.The raison for the project is sound as we all know.JW is 110% keen on the Company complying with all aspects of legislation.We have made rapid and good progress since he joined. There were never any protests for 10+ years until viability of the project became clear and more certain in 2017
Like others here as you can expect I am too in a loss position but that is fully manageable as my family Trusts are well balanced and supported from other sources .You win some,you lose some.This one is high risk but over time the risk of the good ship's voyage have actually diminished.
I will treat L with quite some caution but I consider that as long as her posts here are factually accurate and fairly presented at least we have her viewpoint of the developing scene of opposing views.Sleep well whilst the project matures and rides the waves of the current choppy seas !
.. & thanks Si.. Can someone please change the subject line now as it's a bit weird lol...
Hi guys, appreciate that Snowman, this forum is for expressing & sharing views, as long as any info shared is factually correct & supported, & all are polite & reasonable, then all I believe are welcome ... Speedy telling people to "return to Twitter" is a tad rude, but I have a very thick skin, so no offence taken :)
I also agree with Snowy's sentiments. Living where I do (ANOB and SSSI) with very similar wildlife, I would be a hypocrite not to share the same concerns as the locals there.
I say Snowy!! a stiff reply!!
Here's one for you, well said and I fully concur with your setiments on the subject.
Here's another, it doesn't matter what new projects, similar types to ours, or where they are starting up, there will and always have been and will be voices against. What I want to see is the correct procedures adhered to by the people involved in such projects, something that JW certainly has done, then I see no issues whatsoever. Balance against these issues the benefits of such projects and I think most will agree they are beneficial to all.
Mr T
I would add, just for the record that I hold a first class BSc honours in Environmental Sciences majoring in ecology and oceanography..........and I have faith that the marine checks will be sufficient to protect the environment.
Leesa. This is not personal but you're in the wrong place. This forum is for shareholders and investors, please return to twitter with your other protesting buddies.
Leesa has said before that she is female and IMO her view is perfectly valid.....why shouldn't she not like the idea of the project? It's a free world. There is absolutely no need of abuse.
If I was a local, I would want to make absolutely sure that the brine discharge wouldn't cause harm to the marine bio in close proximity. Among other local species there are dolphins and Grey seals and it's only natural to want to protect them.
IMO the stringent marine environment checks, modelling and monitoring we are undertaking which are a statutory requirement are put in place by the marine authorities in order to protect them so they will not be harmed.
We will make sure we comply explicitly with that, and rightly so!
Meanwhile Leesa and all the locals are entitled to their protectionist views and I fully empathise with that.....but I'm sure all the due processes and safeguards when put in place will help to give them more confidence in our operation.
I've spoken with John in London and he's very environmentally sympathetic and aware and I'm 100% sure he is doing all that he could possibly do to conserve the environment during the temporary saline discharge. Saline discharge won't even be an issue once the solution mining stage is over.
I'm now battening down the hatches and getting ready for some stiff replies.
GLA !
Hi whatamess, it is entirely possible to disagree with people & still be friendly & polite, and yes (for the 2nd time on this board) I'm a She :)
Lol Speedy I've never hidden who I am, even that post states "for transparency", I'm upfront, honest, post links to facts & try to help with balance, which may not be appreciated by you, but others are maybe willing to look at all arguments & make informed choices... If I were investing money I would want to look at all available information before committing to supporting a project, wouldn't you?
As always, go well :)
1) She holds no shares or interest in the success of Infa.
2) She is only here to discourage shareholder sentiment in the hope of lowering SP and support for the project.
3) She will fight tooth and nail to have us fail.
4) Her own words from a previous post, "For transparency, I will still have a problem with the generation of the caverns & associated saturated brine discharge, which will cause harm however it's spun. That's why storage for gas for which I have not been able to find a need causes concern."
Did John ever get anywhere with his plan B, regarding disposing of brine elsewhere?