We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Further to the above. It may be worth contacting William Hague regarding the China connections. I believe he recently instigated a blocking order to a UK company takeover by the Chinese.
Tell you what onthebeach3,
If you could provide an alternative, then fair play.
Otherwise, complaining won't help you as there is no "scam".
pointless.
"will certainly be doing my part."
Your part in what exactly...?
Holding with diamond hands?
Hi Rosie...I'm just off out the door in a minute, to get my little girl from school and after that off to her grandma's for tea..so if someone else is already a member there, it'd be great if they could re-post on the other board. Many thanks.
The 3 key people to contact at miu are : Rashmine.Sethi ; Sarah.Partridge-Smith ; Toby.Hall ; they are involved with the HUR case, but if you write to the MIU mailbox, I'm sure it will get passed onto the investigating team.
Hi there RF...the first bit is as I've typed it and the last bit is as per your link ie fca dot org dot uk. Very strange that lse is preventing the full link being posted, clearly they want to for some reason prevent messages to this key dept for market oversight. The miu have recently written out to HUR bod with numerous issues, but my fear is that the hur bod delay a reply. Clearly, the more who write into them the better imo.
Please keep writing folks. If Anne is correct and John Glen is involved, this means our voices can cause considerable impact.
So write to:-
Rishi Sunak
rishi.sunak.mp@parliament.uk
John Glen
john.glen.mp@parliament.uk
Kwasi Kwarteng
kwasi.kwarteng.mp@parliament.uk
and if John Glen is involved then write to him here:-
https://members.parliament.uk/member/4051/contact
john.glen.mp@parliament.uk
Did you mean primary.market.integrity@fca.org.uk
I did not find an email with MIUmailbox
https://www.fca.org.uk/markets/primary-markets/contact/complaint-against-issuer
Anne37,
Welcome to the board with your first message here.
A big 10-4 to all you wrote.
Either an adjournment of the so-called 'virtual hearing' (and is that really eligible in law ?) or a deferment of judgement would oblige the company to hold its annual AGM in June, at which point it is the shareholders who have the say, not the BoD.
fca.org.uk
Sorry, forgot to add - for anyone who wishes to feed into their HUR review, the direct email address of the 'Market Integrity Unit' at the FCA is: MIUMailbox@fca.org.uk
"It appears to me, that the best outcome for all of us shareholders, is to have an adjournment to the proposed court hearing of 21/5...and if the judge would allow the case to be adjourned 'sine die', then even better. The BoD are clearly desperate for this to be resolved a week tomorrow, as the 'Step Regulations/Covid Roadmap' that has allowed UK companies to have closed meetings (with no s/h's present), is due to end on 21/6 - and after that date HUR shareholders can call an EGM and remove this disgraceful BoD. These covid restrictions, have allowed this BoD to pursue their own agenda, without any possible involvement of s/holders "
Apologies for not being involved with all the good initiatives being put forwards on this BB atm but everytime I think of how much I've 'lost', I become pretty useless at any coherent thought re HUR. However, the above did spark a thought. During covid times hasn't there been any debt relief for companies similar to people. thought I saw something around that there was and if so why hasn't HUR utilized this facility? (if it exists)
It appears to me, that the best outcome for all of us shareholders, is to have an adjournment to the proposed court hearing of 21/5...and if the judge would allow the case to be adjourned 'sine die', then even better. The BoD are clearly desperate for this to be resolved a week tomorrow, as the 'Step Regulations/Covid Roadmap' that has allowed UK companies to have closed meetings (with no s/h's present), is due to end on 21/6 - and after that date HUR shareholders can call an EGM and remove this disgraceful BoD. These covid restrictions, have allowed this BoD to pursue their own agenda, without any possible involvement of s/holders - without this terrible pandemic, such a situation would never have arisen. To try and ensure s/h's 'play ball', and don't react to losing 95% of the company, Maris has issued an appalling threat ie if the court doesn't approve the BoD request on 21/5, then he will quickly run down offshore operations and declare the company insolvent, again all before s/h's can react from 21/6. I understand the MIU are currently investigating Hur BoD actions and that John Glen, the City Minister is also included in the review. The problem is time though - will they have concluded their investigations in time to influence the 21/5...if not, then THEY should call for a court adjournment imho - and they should also prevent the forced insolvency of the company by our disgraceful CEO.