Stefan Bernstein explains how the EU/Greenland critical raw materials partnership benefits GreenRoc. Watch the full video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
...so Warwick Field having deeper OWC to Lincoln Field OWC does not mean anything either as presented at CMD. All we have is CMD material - unless you have insider insight? ppt is true until HUR give out more interpretation. Until then... WD build was predominantly in FB, therefore weathered section was behind cement & casing. We live in HUR M&M bubble... meanwhile SP is still fried.
Its a cartoon on a ppt not a well plan...
WD build section in CMD ppt was in FB. All successful wells have build predominantly outside FB. If build in FB, then weathered section is behind cement & casing...
'not draining any real incremental acerage'
..so if well 6 (say) has been drilled and connected the meshwork of >300 MMBO [July CMD], you would only still drill one well to drain 300 MMBO? sounds you are friendly with md. Because the fracture perms >10D were every you drill to tap into meshwork there will be interference, this is not pigeon pie.
GF,
"Where else you put the build?? In basement?? Some nonsensical posts pretending to be drilling engineers on here today"
Hear, hear.
Where else you put the build?? In basement?? Some nonsensical posts pretending to be drilling engineers on here today
Thought it was just for interference testing. As they've now seen they react almost as one wellbore I'll say very low chance they'd do that again, not draining any real incremental acerage, second well is a waste.
..the ‘cat’ = Chief RE (HE)
‘Forked Well Pattern’
Been thinking more about forks! (Need to get a life - I know) but starting to make great sense. In FBs main oil volume in big fractures therefore if 300 million BO plus connected to one horizontal well then makes sense to connect to that meshwork of fractures with more than one well => fork pattern achieves that plus ‘fork’ nature means wells have increasing distance from each other tooo. With hindsight makes perfect sense. Where md was coming from, in conventional reservoirs oil recovery improvements come from sweep improvements, ie need to spread wells out in optimal locations, which as Lancaster is showing due to massive permeability in the main fractures and where the main oil is, is counter intuitive. HE chief RE can now write a paper on that too! Boosting his status even more, well done him! Horses for courses wins again... yes - going back to golf course till I get stuck in a bunker again and more mad thoughts appear.
You're definitely getting carried away, Beer belly, and beginning to sound like a ramper.
Remember, you're supposed to talk about all the things that could go wrong, e.g. all the oil drying up, or even if it does dry up, no one will want it any more, or even if they still want it, the price will go so low because of Trump that it won't be worth extracting it any more, and even if none of these things happen, the share price will collapse in a stock market crash.
I've had plenty of practice on SOU, where posters claim that the gas found and independently valued doesn't actually exist.
Yes SotB I was referring to virgin pressure not geography but your point is valid.
..very true and means just three wells on WC could easily fill a new boat with 40,000 BOPD capacity, very commercial. Fork pattern holding up very well too on Lancaster which was md concern - horses for courses. LC2 probably most likely design too. Having build section outside FB great decision too - May have led to WD failure being 50m deep to plan.
Well well, absolutely, amongst todays many distractions it's easy to lose sight of the info that HUR have been producing an average of 16k bopd plus (against guidance of 9k). Since they won't be taking any chances at all with the integrity of the reservoir it means they must be ultra confident in its performance. This is stunningly positive news (go on SIPP ...get a bit carried away!)
Wellwell:: West Coast is Virgin......
Whatever they think, these wells are performing. There are not many wells these days in the UKCS with sustained daily production figures of 10k. Yes when virgin, yes when you shoot them to bits, but figures like this are a thing of the 70’s-90’s. Golden Eagle was pretty prolific in recent history but I’m unaware of many other big fields producing at this level on a well by well basis.
..putting the ‘cat’ with the pigeons. Clearly conventional REs think FB is just cut and paste! technically.
If you want a giggle, read the 16:55 post over there.