We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
He's at work presently lenz. He never posts between 8 and 8.
Let's enjoy his absence.
Z
Why doesn’t everyone bin BiggL as he spouts absolute rubbish “”STOP feeding the clown “
Biggl - I assume you will be reading this thread to gauge reaction; As a courtesy, then can you please answer my post I put to you a few weeks ago ?:-
Floater
Biggl - a simple question24 Nov 2021 22:59
Biggl - I'm not posting to get into any heated or technical discussion and I don't try to be or state I'm an expert at anything. I don't doubt you have some knowledge but I can't help notice your posting style seems quite fluent and quite well structured, grammatically; actually well prepared springs to mind. (not that I agree with any of it)
I see you have only been a member on the LSE boards for approx 8 weeks yet you post concisely with confidence which you generally don't get with newish type posters - newbies generally take some time to find their feet, yet you were highly confident from the first post. Also by some of your commentary then it would appear you are a seasoned investor; so did you come across the LSE boards by chance or actually have you been a previous LSE member and came back with a new account and name ?
(Obviously you are now a member for approx 10 weeks)
There has to be a reasonable chance that of an aggressive buyout of NCM. Telfer and Havieron (75%) being reasonable strategic asserts. Would that be better for our share price?
Thanks BiggL.
Your posts have resulted in the more knowledgable posters on this bb reinforcing my confidence in this share. Their posts being much more informed and evidence based. I expect it has done so for many others. I’m buying some more shares here tomorrow. In fact I will sell some others I have to increase my pot.
Shame about that $3,098 comment as well, Bigg. I don’t think Bamps and Hydro are gonna let you live that one down!
Oh dear, BiggL. You’ve not heard of the 4.2m resource (proven + probable) at Brucejack? Do you understand this figure applies a mine call factor to those 10m oz figures and accounts for the stoping ops? And you don’t seem to understand the large capex requirements (drilling and alternative mine construction) which will be required at Brucejack, for NCM to grow this asset.
Why do you willfully ignore the Brucejack AISC even with their great grades?
Anyways, off to play Santa at my sons school :)
Mr $3098 costs per ounce
You have no concept of the procedures involved with SLOS then bulk caving and then the effect on capex.
All that you have written is so far from reality , you quite obviously haven’t grasped what is going to happen.
3 years to pay back the capex
All capex for the bulk mining paid for from the SLOS operation
All capex costs are 30% Ggp
The tolling payments are a joint venture payment only 30% charge to Ggp
The first half of the SLOS operation is where the cheapest AISC will happen, the second half will involve far more backfilling with higher AISC. This crosses over the bulk caving start up with high AISC once this is done the AISC drops dramatically at the same of the SLOS operation costs dwindling.
You can’t seem to grasp the SLOS operation is going to pay for the bulk caving start up capex.
All your remarks tonight are looking very amateurish with false conclusions
If you believe that Biggles is making incorrect statements/misleading investors with an agenda, then the course of action is to report to the moderators. Enough is enough! This guy has been here before as other monikers.
GLA true GGP investors.
Viking
BiggL....you're digging a bigger hole for yourself, each time you post. Your posting history is already showing signs that you are inconsistent, to say the least and now you flag this up:
".....The project economics do not include the tolling arrangement whereby capital expenditure such as upgrades to the processing plant at Telfer will be paid by Newcrest 100% and Greatland will pay a capital contribution and tolling margin to Newcrest as part of the proposed tolling arrangement..."
The above confirms what Hydrogen stated an hour ago...NCM will be paying 100% of the Capex costs such as upgrades..... perhaps english isn't your first language and you have struggled to interpret this? If so, I forgive you but why have you just confirmed what he stated?
The quote goes onto declare that GGP are part of the tolling agreement. Do you know what that agreement is? I do. DYOR and report back to me when you are suitably briefed.
I have spotted numerous 'glitches' scattered across your history (there is a cracker on Oct 24th by the way), which suggests that once people start manipulating facts, it becomes much harder to maintain that deceit.
But carry on biggl. You have a cross to bear most certainly, probably because of what happened to you as a child perhaps? Of late, someone has upset you on this forum and you 'feel the need' to 'deceive'.
How many GGP shares did you say you had? Oh, you didn't ...and you haven't.........
Run along bigl, run along.....
Z
Hi Hydro
How can anyone write something so blatantly incorrect and just dismiss it and then turn around other figures to twist their arguments, baffles me why anyone would want to bother.
Oh I forgot a shorter would.
Now $3,098 per ounce revenue is as you suggest another story, more likely than $3098 cost per ounce
Hi Mr $3098 cost per ounce
There you go miss quoting in fact
Hannams capex figures are combined bulk caving and SLOS
I think you need to think before you post
If I need any financial assistance it would be from my son who is a finance director it definitely wouldn’t be from someone who keeps getting their sums wrong.
I ask you $3098 cost per ounce no gold would ever come out the ground
"In fact Hannam show ..."
I went to have a look at what Hannam showed.
The latest Hannam informtion I can see (target 28.3) is from September 2021 - can anyone point me to any newer report if one exists. I'm looking at https://greatlandgold.com/investors/analyst-coverage/ and scrolling to research
BiggL - so you’ve been on LSE since 27th September and yet you seem to know everything about GGP and all our main posters - so who were you before you got banned from LSE? I dare say we’ve had to put up with your attempts at negativity and disruption in the past and even if we get you banned again, you’ll come back as another alter-ego. I feel sorry for you that you clearly missed out on getting into GGP pre-2p days, or perhaps you did and then sold too early? The truth is rather than being a glass half-empty type and trying to snipe at the weaker investors or newbies here in order to get them to sell up, why don’t you just buy some GGP stock at a decent price now and then see where it takes you in the next 12-18 months? Personally don’t care what you do as you’re green binned by me as I can’t be bothered reading anymore of your unsubtle disruptive poison. Good riddance.
@BiggL - Why do you persist at making a fool of yourself. Every single post you have made has been totally discredited.
Every single person reading any of the threads will see straight through you. May I suggest that you take up a different occupation because you are obviously not very good at this one.
Always baffles me how people are prepared to spend days even weeks sometimes trying to convince people how bad a stock is and they don’t even own it. But at least Freddie has found a friend :-)
Biggl your altruism shines through lol. Though why you would keep commenting on ggp which you blatantly don't hold is something quite bizarre. Can't get my head around it and don't really want to tbh.
Mr $3098 cost per ounce is back
$643 AISC figure is an average projection for the SLOS mining operation.
Shaun has told us the bulk mining method could see the AISC halved.
Telfer processing costs are nothing to do with Ggp that’s why there is going to be a tolling payment yet to be agreed.
Telfer is NCM responsibility not Ggp
@BiggL
"MF11, I am not sure why data based on an actual corporate acquisition transaction recently executed by Newcrest, could ever be considered ridiculous."
It is not the data that is ridiculous, it is your manipulation of this data to suit your agenda that is ridiculous.
Freddie the difference though is that you do show some balance,
BiggL is constantly aiming to put over and emphasise negative arguments.
On another board earlier a poster had the honesty to say he/she was a shorter. Whether you like it or not, that is at least being honest, and everybody then knows where they stand with that poster.
Most posters here want GGP to succeed because they have invested in the company, sometimes very significantly, so a constantly negative voice is going to be pretty unwelcome, fact of life.
Bigl you will never win on here , so many blinkered views , paddy gets 60 or 70 tick ups for saying almost anything , i believe we all want the same thing but many cant accept whats happened to their paper profits in the last 12 months . I tried some balanced questions yesterday but some got annoyed
So buy at today’s price if you believe GGP is undervalued. Easy money then right?
It's generally accepted that it'll be on Thursday am in Oz; Wednesday night here, but not 100%. It could possibly still be next week.
Do we have NCM quarterly update this Wednesday?
Oh I wonder what Santadeep has got in our stockings for wednesday night. Think i'll have some shiny eastern breccia results for starters.
GLA