London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
" He’s trying to blind us with science."
=======================================
Joker, an excellent start to the week for you...'quote of the day'....could even be a contender for 'quote of the year'.
I laughed out loud..... Trying to blind someone with science for a 'pharma' stock is hilarious!!
Classic Joker
Crusader, blimey m8, you're even confusing yourself...'that'...'it'....'he'....(what about 'she'?).
Kudos to anyone who understood your post.
Blah blah blah blah blah again from Baldy the expert scientist. He’s trying to blind us with science. Well I just ignore this and carry on living on Fantasy Island waiting for the 108p (MINIMUM). Getting closer.
Correction
So, with the use of "that"....... (not "it")......
b_e, you are indeed correct and if you had taken the time to read my post, you should have noticed that I never wrote that "he" did. What I did write was that "the poster is fully aware that the patches have needles since it states explicitly that" (apols for the original misspelling). There was no mention of what "he" wrote in his post. So, with the use of "it", I surely must have been referring to the article he posted which does explicitly refer to needles (next-generation microneedle skin patch).....nuff said.
I'm afraid I have no interest in your childish rantings. I am, however, interested to see the outcome of this since to me it doesn't seem right (Placebo and no re-testing) and although I may be wrong, my opinion is that this may just be an attempt to stop the share price dropping further. I wait and see.
"I'm sure not even Jesus knows that."
==========================================
He may not but I do.
Crusader, there was no mention of 'microneedles' in Goldilocks posts...so it was perfectly correct of me to point out that the technology being used in the new vaccine patches under research aren't in any way similar to any technology that FUM possess.
The thing about vaccines is that a controlled amount of the vaccine has to be administered for efficacy & safety reasons. Too little and it won't provide the required protection and too much and there could be adverse reactions. Unfortunately IMO Dermasys isn't an appropriate technology because there isn't enough control of the level of absorption (too many variables e.g. atmospheric conditions, type of skin etc) and that's even before considering whether the vaccine itself could even be forced through the skin barrier by Dermasys (unlikely IMO). The skin is an effective barrier to viruses - if it wasn't we would be truly fcukd - and a vaccine is often derived from some biologically engineered form of the virus itself (although I expect other approaches are now available). SO to get the vaccine through the skin it has to be pierced...hence the microneedles.
SO Dermasys is likely to fail on so counts...it cannot control the quantity of vaccine delivered and it probably cannot even get the vaccine through the skin.
But I suppose on Fantasy island anything is possible.
PS I met Jesus once...a nice chap from South America. He didn't perform any miracles. Perhaps FUM could employ him and he could perform one there!!!
b _e, unless I'm mistaken, the poster is fully aware that the patches have needles since it states ecplicitely that. What the poster was probably referring to was could there be a possible use of the dermasys system which is not intrusive as an alternative. I'm sure not even Jesus knows that.
Jesus, it's like dealing with a bunch of kids!! Before people start wetting themselves in anticipation that FUM's SP will quadruple on the news tomorrow morning...here are my thoughts!!
The skin patches contain microneedles - no use of Dermasys or any technology that FUM specialise in.
The reason for the interest...it's so that the vaccine can be self-administered, making the roll out of the vaccine to the world's population both easier & cheaper. Especially relevant in third world countries where they don't necessariy have the number of trained nurses to deliver the vaccine in sufficient quantity & at sufficient speed. There is also talk that the vaccine may require 2 doses and protection may only last a year. So alternative methods of administering the vaccine would be very useful.
But alas FUM & Dermasys ain't in the picture...unless you live on Fantasy island!!
But why let the truth get in the way of a good fantasy.
Vaccines through the skin !!
http://www.pharmatimes.com/news/uk_firm_starts_research_on_skin_patch_for_covid_vaccines_1346035