Utilico Insights - Jacqueline Broers assesses why Vietnam could be the darling of Asia for investors. Watch the full video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Still no RNS about TPR....so it looks like the assumption that the end of February was a cliff edge decision point may be less likely. Presumably we just have to await the decision of the regulator now.
Perhaps there will be some new information in the final results....due soon?!
good evening to you LTU.i am indeed well and hope you are also.i understand your argument but with respect i do not find it convincing there are other obvious factors to explain yesterday's fall and as i mentioned previously the main drop took place some time after the market opened which to me would suggest it was more to do with general poor market sentiment than anything else.the reality is that it could be either a buy or a sell and neither of us can say for certain.we may of course receive a TR1 at the beginning of next week which may make matters clear but as the trade in itself was below 1% we may never know unless it causes an existing holder to cross a reporting threshold.for my part i am content to leave this particular debate alone now pending possibly getting an announcement next week.in turn i trust you will also enjoy the remainder of your weekend.
Good evening, the Italian, I hope you are well.
For someone to purchase 1.6 million FUM shares I would have thought the SP would certainly be higher to coax out a significant amount of sellers in order to accumulate such a large amount. However, the SP has declined 20% in the past 2 weeks suggesting the opposite has happened - and the 1.6 million is indeed a sell (maybe an average of 13p over this 2 week period agreed with the MM executing the orders - makes sense) which also explains this drop. Someone wants out by the looks of it.
Hope this helps and enjoy the rest of your weekend.
actually LTO i broadly agree with you.it doesn'tmean anything necessarily.but in fairness it was you who first suggested it could be LO "dumping"with no basis for the suggestion other than speculation and perhaps,dare i say it,an agenda.just balancing the cart.
I'll never understand why some try and scrutinise individual transactions, as for every buy there's a sell and the direction of the SP is the ultimate indicator. and with the SP diving 9% that tells its own story.
Maybe it's the rampers trying to mislead new investors into thinking there's huge interest so they can get out of this at a higher price?
sm have a look at my post at 11.41 yesterday. the general consensus is that it must have been a buy bases on the fact that 13p was paid
7-Feb-20 17:29:46 13.00 1,595,000 Unknown* 0.00 0.00 207.35k
Was this a buy or sell?
LTU, the chances of your assumption being correct are quite low IMO. This 'deadline' isn't the cliff edge you think it is (again IMO).
"Based on your 'assumption' I suppose IF Thornton & Ross had not supplied the necessary test data to the regulator and IF the regulator was then obliged to void the TPR submission then FUM would presumably be obliged to issue an RNS to that effect. "
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That's my assumption exactly, bald eagle, I'm just under the impression that today is the deadline to answer the TPR questions otherwise it's dead and buried hence there should be an update one way or the other. Anyway, I must be off now. It's been a pleasure exchanging views, bald eagle and the Italian, and I wish you both a very enjoyable weekend.
Don't forget that Thornton & Ross have until the end of today to supply the test data to the regulator...so any RNS that FUM would be required to issue would be next week or possibly after business close today.
LTU, I suppose IF you are a FUM investor I was indirectly saying that you might be 'peeved'....for that I apologise if you were offended and have never in your entire life shown any degree of 'peevishness'.
Based on your 'assumption' I suppose IF Thornton & Ross had not supplied the necessary test data to the regulator and IF the regulator was then obliged to void the TPR submission then FUM would presumably be obliged to issue an RNS to that effect.
The fact that FUM hasn't issued an RNS (as yet) may suggest that either your assumption is incorrect OR that Thornton & Ross supplied the necessary data to the regulator in the required timescale.
You said this earlier, bald eagle: "Also investors would get a bit peeved to see lots of pointless RNS's". Just a strange comment IMO.
I'm also assuming the TPR submission will be voided if the deadline is passed, because what's the point in the deadline in the first place then?
LTU, did I say you were 'peeved'?
LTU, so you're assuming that the regulator will void the TPR submission if Thornton & Ross don't supply the requested information by the end of Feb 2020 deadline? That's quite an assumption...on what do you base it?
"I expect Thornton & Ross to have supplied the requested additional test results to the regulator"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So why is the website still saying:
"This work is progressing, and we expect Thornton & Ross to respond by the end of February 2020 within the timelines agreed with the MHRA."
"You were somehow expecting Thornton & Ross to hand back the TPR rights to FUM or FUM to take back control of TPR from Thornton & Ross. It could happen at some point in the future but I don't really see why it should happen now. "
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The MHRA have given Thornton a deadline to answer the questions, so I'm assuming if they don't answer them at the end of February 2020 (NOW!) then the TPR submission becomes null and void. Hence my belief that FUM should really update the shareholders. Wow, you lot are so blinkered it's frightening!
PS. And I've never myself been "peeved" at so called unnecessary RNSs. Do you get "peeved"? Really? Do you go round the house throwing things at the wall shouting "Oh, that RNS was so unnecessary!" If you do, you need to get out more, lol!
LTU, so if FUM were to issue an RNS that told us: "Thornton & Ross have responded to the MHRA request for additional data on TPR by the end of February 2020 by supplying the required information prior to the 1st March 2020"
What would that actually tell us and would it really be worth an RNS.
You were somehow expecting Thornton & Ross to hand back the TPR rights to FUM or FUM to take back control of TPR from Thornton & Ross. It could happen at some point in the future but I don't really see why it should happen now. I expect Thornton & Ross to have supplied the requested additional test results to the regulator who will now study that data & make a judgement, which can - based on past experience - take an unexpectedly long time.
Don’t know why I am replying really to a guy who bragged he shorted this share for 1p , says it all really
don't think you can argue with the s/p.also the opening s/p today was not marked down much it didn't fall to any extent until trading was well under way. todays fall reflects nothing more than general poor market sentiment imo .
The share price is doing well considering the slaughter on the stock market this week
Rubbish , if it was a sell would have been 12.25 approx maybe lower as so much , just ridiculous all these lies
Certainly NOT a buy! The SP shows the way and if it was a buy the SP would be much higher. As it is the SP has plunged today with a big spread suggesting plenty of available stock with the MMs not wanting anymore. Lombard playing games with the PIs?
thank you for that tombi.very strange as its not showing on LSE trades for me. anyway as you say clearly a buy.
At the time the ask was approx 12.74
17.29 at 13p over 1.5 mill way over the ask , £207k
tomb i must be missing something as i cannot see any large trades after hours yesterday.where is it shown please?