Stefan Bernstein explains how the EU/Greenland critical raw materials partnership benefits GreenRoc. Watch the full video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I have not made any attack on POQ's family....if you care to reread my post. Again you surprise me...POODS thanks it was nice chatting with you. I find it stimulating to talk to a man of your experience and to know that I am in good company! Stay well!
I was wondering if POODS or someone else could enlighten me about what hurdles there are to buying large amounts of stock. I am quite a novice investor and have only ever bought say 20k shares at a time and they have always gone through right away at whatever I set the limit at. Does the mechanics of this change when I hear you say I will be attempting to add 250k shares ? or is it purely there being enough shares on the market to buy at that time ? i.e. I see an ask on tsx for 250k shares at .13 cad so I assume that's what available at that price ?
Camelot :: you are becoming really sad now why not just chill , a verbal attack on another man’s family is unforgivable GLA
Glad he is kind and humble. Maybe that will happen here now. Probably not.
All-
I indeed had a pleasant visit with Camelot yesterday and found him to be a kind, humble man, which is not always the case on this board, but generally is. He goes back with FOG a few years longer than me and like most of us is disappointed in the politicians making the mess they have. But as I have said before, not all is POQ fault. Yes, I still think he is overpaid but at this point the board is not going to change that or their personal deals. Today, I am trying to add 250,000 additional shares due to the quality of the seismic logs, okay flow rates and the recent significant interest shown by Mr. Sheffield. I will continue as opportunity presents itself to add to my position. POODS
I really feel I need to say this....POQ you are like a used car...that is collecting dust....no one wants to look at you or listen to you....a complete bust....maybe you can talk to your kids and wife...but as a CEO....your a real lunch back let down...and Craven must feel sick about hiring someone of your caliber...just a huge mistake! But people do make them...
click clock click clock......Time is going to run out on you! You must be the joke of London....Who will listen to you anymore? I would imagine that all of the money managers in Dublin have dumped you. LOL
new, thanks for the first hand details.
Yes I have talked to POODS. A very decent guy. You can laugh all you want. I don't see an issue with talking to another shareholder. What's the big deal with that? You seem to take an issue with communication.
Camelot: you have explained yourself very clearly you call me stupid , I take insults as compliments from fools who know better GLA
oh cammy....
Time for change! Talked to poods yet???? lol
I think that we are reaching a point of where the TSX Venture should get involved. As for you JF Healey you never cease to amaze me at how stupid you are. All shareholders have a right to their opinion. This situation has not been well managed by POQ. He has been inconsistent at best. He comes out with these big shot interviews with the London Times and then cannot back it up with results. He knows what he is doing. I think by the time it's all said and done he won't be able to get a table at McDonald's.
Darnit -- I have somewhat fond memories of that AGM in 2009, and while the exact timing of everything is a big foggy -- here is the end result of what happened the day after the AGM was abruptly adjourned.
Blair Sandford requested that myself and a few others (including The Knight and the representative of a much larger British investment group) come back the next day for an emergency AGM. Bruner tried to reschedule the AGM to later in December, and then tried to stop the emergency AGM from going forward the next day.
The major shareholders (Burlingame, Viktor and some others) were totally against Bruner's plan to do another massive fund raise with a Chinese group that would have seen Falcon's stock diluted by another 40% and effective control shifted to the Chinese group. This massive dilution of Falcon's shares was voted down the next day and Bruner removed as CEO and soon after John Craven was brought in with the overly expensive Denver office closed and head office moved to Dublin.
UncleBuk, a brief trip down memory lane.
" Burlingame Asset Management, LLC ("Burlingame"), which exercises control over approximately 17.5% of the outstanding common shares of Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd. ("Falcon"), wishes to publicly express its disappointment that the annual and special meeting of the shareholders of Falcon held onDecember 10, 2009 in Vancouver, British Columbia was abruptly adjourned to December 22, 2009 with no advance notice to shareholders and for no stated business reason.
Blair Sanford, the managing member of Burlingame, said, "A number of shareholders, us included, invested both time and money in order to attend the meeting and it is of great concern to us that the scheduled business was not dealt with, without any warning or justification given to the meeting by management. We fully expect Falcon to proceed with the rescheduled meeting, and reserve the right to take all steps necessary to ensure that Falcon's shareholders are not disenfranchised of their rights."
If this teleconference call last 20 minutes, I'll be amazed. And I think everyone knows there won't be hardball question presented.
JFHealy. They Don't even acknowledge you sent a question for the AGM, in my case. They obviously pick and choose the puff ball questions that work for them. Has anyone else had this problem when submitting questions? Not only this, but no replies from my emails and no answer on the phone. Should we rent a billboard in Dublin and show our concerns this way, I'm open to suggestions at this point?
Camelot1 : With the AGM coming up shortly why not phone in and put your grievance to Philip directly . I really do not see what you expect to gain from posting on this bulletin board , I am always surprised at how few people ask a question at these meetings, GLA
POQ has been a big disappointment. He has had enough time to create shareholder value and has been well paid. Those two facts are not in question. Yet he feels that he can continue down this path of shareholder destruction. I have to say that the stock options that he has given himself are a complete disgrace. I have said before that I have no problem with people being well paid for work well done but it does not appear to be here in this situation. This guy must have a tough time looking in the mirror but maybe not. Craven should be ashamed at his choice. He was a good CEO and created a great deal of value. If any of you remember when POQ raised funds back in 2013 the stock had a run to 30 cents and then right after issuing shares largely to the previous investors of Craven it plummeted. Not unlike what has happened to Sheffield. A pattern of behavior. AGAIN POQ you are obvious!!!
It won't happen until the process of monetisation happens especially in a shiitte market like this.
May 4th 2022, As soon as that clown opened his yap (ONCE AGAIN) to the second, this thing started its slide and hasn't stopped, he is a menace. A responsible CEO would address a 50% slide in stock value, ours is in hiding I suppose.