We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I was thinking about the location of the final round of drilling and reckon it provides clues as to the roadmap. In the Oct presentation on strategy LR clearly favoured an ambitious drill outside the inferred to the east. This changed to a more conservative approach going inside the inferred area close to our indicated targetting the central mining zone. If you think about this in the context of LR's comment "We talk to people from industry and we get asked questions, and we feed back those questions into the process, and are quite pleased when we can answer all of them" it suggests that a potential miner wanted 100% confidence that the prospect is economic in its initial phase over knowing more about possible extensions. It also ties in with the decision not to add the findings to the JORC, preserving cash is likely a factor but if we sacrificed the chance to drill in a way which could have had a greater impact on our JORC in return for rubber stamping phase 1 of the mine life then maybe it was unnecessary. In other words the purpose of these drills was never to increase the megatonnes but to de-risk on behalf of the potential miner.
For the record....Europa metals is NOT A MINING Company . Its a mining exploration Company. Big difference between the two IMO. Hence my belief that Goldquest Iberica it will be sold. Im in the payout queue Bobby. DYOR.GLA.
Shed, like you I felt that the research that I done on the company more than warranted the investment I made. However, since then I’ve averaged down in order to try and keep pace with the drop in sp. that was a mistake as you should never try to catch a falling knife. I currently have north of 84 mil shares and I expect the bod, including LR to play their part in looking after all of our investments. Currently I don’t feel as if they are, even though realistically I know they are. I don’t feel that communication is their strong suit so perhaps it’s time they either changed the way they operate in that respect or employ someone that can communicate. I’m pleased this week is over in all honesty, perhaps a better week next week where we can claw back some of our losses. GL mate
Guys, we’ve done the Geo, we’ve done the hydro, mets an asset to come, in that order we hope, ducks are lining up. More stakeholder engagement and we’re well on our way, the markets will settle as they always do and a vaccine will be found, calmness will return as it always does hold tight everybody it’s going to be a rough one. GLA.
Understood Newbie and I get your frustration at the RNS's .... let's just say lacking vibrancy. I did talk to LR about this and suggested some non-rampy energy in the regulated statements, after all we have a good news story to tell. My impression is that the news is presented for industry first and PI's second. In a way we should all take confidence in that, but it's an uncomfortable place for folk like myself who are backing this company at the moment.
Shed, as I said in my previous post about having the most colourless and bland RNSs. I certainly hope somebody can inject some enthusiasm and positivity into writing them. I know that an RNS is supposed to be a factual document, but where would the harm be in putting a little enthusiasm into them. Something like, Europa Metal is EXTREMELY pleased blah blah. Instead of bland, bland, bland and blah , blah, blah. My god talk about bore everyone to death before getting into the second sentence. Today is not my finest day as a EUZ supporter, especially after the terse reply I received from LR when I asked for an update. Hopefully a better day on Monday, have a good weekend
....... just disappointed - who remembers that from school? Well a tough day on the markets generally and given that the geotechnical study didn't move the SP I guess the hydrology wasn't going to attract new investors despite its importance, especially in the current climate. As I said first thing we've had a couple of warm-up acts now and next it's hopefully the headliners with assays and mets due.