We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
NTTG, you say "I don’t believe all the fantastical figures being bandied around". Why do you consider them fantastical if they're based on facts and figures? Take Tricky's calculation this morning of 42p. Would you consider this fantastical, and if so, please could you explain where you disagree with his/her figures?
newtothisgame2, I did not follow your suggestion, I do however take a balanced view, on all who post on here, and I take with a large pinch of salt, both the rampers and de-rampers, so your assumption "that I want to believe all he said was correct", is both arrogant and incorrect, which is typical of people like you and Lamtree, playground bullies, now in an adults world, and unable to cope, with being outed, for who you are, and what your motives are, on this forum
Lamtree & Newtothisgame2, how fortunate we inexperienced investors, have U2, to guide us through the minefield, of over zealous share rampers, your dedication knows no bounds, and stops us all getting caught up on False Hope , LOL, the only thing false on here, is U2, with your pretence of concern, yet again it's laughable, and whilst genuine posting of factual concern's is welcome, your constant drivel , is a distraction, to some would be new investors, so well done for that.
Derampers, if you're all so morally worried about us wasting money...why don't you go stand outside bookmakers and talk people out of betting. It's obvious many of you are paid derampers, as you never have anything positive to say, ever.
To any new investors, click on the username and look at the history of their posts and let me know if you find anything positive or constructive towards this share. Bunch of doom mongers.
We're here to invest, we know it's not without risk - why don't you all trot off and leave us to it.
It is so thoughtful of you both to be concerned for other people's welfare..........
How nice of you guys. How duplicitous.
People who are invested are generally fair and want to see their investment do well. They are rightfully angry when idiots come on here and attempt to damage the SP with disingenuous rubbish.
I’m a fair type and have run up 1000s of posts trying to defend BB shares.
Anyone who listens doesn't deserve profit? Just read that back to yourself a few times.
Sure but anyone here who listens doesn’t deserve profit. And I’m sure it must be small fry investors buying a grands worth that do listen. If you had £20k to invest would you only read a bb and decide to not invest.
dealer55, when they come out with disingenuous rubbish like TrickyDicky's post they can be believed by some who sell or don't buy. That damages other investors as the SP falls.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results newto.
I’m surprised there’s not been an RNS to disclose above the percentage ownership of shares by an institution. Maybe it’s still a bit risky for them.
So you are Oldtothisgamethen2.......
Why is anyone still engaging these morons beats me.
today, nothing doing so why open up then drop it down, it should just be flat, check back intraday graphs they are all basically the same (1 / 2 patterns).
And you know all about it then newto?
'For some reason'. Hmmm ....
it's the MM on this, the wave of constant ne ID and negativity means to me this has been forced down and held in a range by MM tactically for some reason.
I really can not understand the idiocy of those wanting to push down the price of EUA. It's already just at 2.7p. Any lower would only be because the company had failed dramatically. Who would be buying in then? That's if they're pushing for a lower price and not just deranged keyboard warriors.
Higher is much more likely with even a small fraction of the valuation of the PGM metals available to EUA. Also because of the expertise they now have on the Board and the ability to sell one mine to easily fund the other mine and control the SP.
Of course the derampers could be people employed to push the price down to allow their employers to buy in cheaply because they know the value of this company. Who knows who those people are? Big business? Big Russian business?