We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Hi CeeJay, could you throw a few sentences together so I know what you are trying to say. Lost with asterixis for words too..
The more you practice the easier it should be.
I look forward to you beginning to communicate
Hey ccok, 2 posts joined 5 minutes ago you cred is very high...... ****head
Gary, you worship a clown, your standing in society recognised.
Thanks for your commitment.
It's gonna be £70 per share!
Agree Evan
Agree with what you say. Lets say 40M PGM eq; at industry standard of $200 (dollars mind) in the ground. Factor in 20% owned by Sinosteel (I think). Factor in open pit mining and then work back to pounds. Come to your own conclusion.
If first recommended bid is not NN, I will be holding for its counter bid.
Doodledoo you are a bigot. If you were as clever as you think, then you wouldn’t need to filter someone that you thought had reading and writing issues.
Avid reader of the board but had to join to use the filter button, hoochy as lots of charachter, however, apart from the obvious interpersonal, reading and writing shortfall he is somewhat encouraged by some to continue to be a clown, most shamefully.
I only need to edit him for my own conscience and to follow real threads.
Sorry Hoochy
Yuk doodledoo! Hoochy has told us before that he is self-taught so to call him illiterate is a low blow. He’s hell of a lot more clued up than a lot of the have a go heroes on here. Also to whoever just had a go at Ceejay again, he is my partner of 11 years, father of my children. He runs a very successful business and we have a lovely lifestyle.
Hoochy, you are illiterate and boring. Binned for being a wannabe.
Don't know why people get so annoyed by Hoochys values, i don't think this will go for anywhere near £35 per share but this hasn't gone on this long for 50p.
Going to be some seriously rich people on this board soon and i hope to be one of them.
We might even cause a spike in inflation with everyone buying Mercs, Porsches, Astons, Lambos.
Dmitry did say “no small deals to the table”. Do you think 50pence per share is a small deal partypooper? I do!
50p more likely than £2.50 IMO, never mind £35. Hoochy is pretending to be puddled but the mask slips now and then.
Oh, I don't agree with outlandish figures but don't forget the magic Rhodium (plus some other REE's too) and the fact that we are the last kind of opportunity for a major miner to acquire. A potential bidding war.
Then there is the bullish trend of PGM's for the medium-term along with the scope of nickel and copper in the mining waste on the ground we own.
It certainly will not be £50 a share sale but we will be rather pleasantly surprised, IMO.
GLA.
If people are seriously saying that £35 is more likely than £1 or even 50p, they need to go do some simple research and calculations
Ramping £35 actually does Eurasia no justice, nor shareholders who are making informed decisions. If anything, it’s trolling the board with 10x the figures that snake Monty used to shout. In fact, it wouldn’t surprise me if it was Monty. Using Hoochy as an alias so that people speak about hoochy and forget the ramblings of Rowka
EXAMPLE:
We know EUA have 2.2moz proven resources, we know the flanks have near 16moz total. We know the licences areas have almost 20moz in total. We also know that there is a potential for 40 moz if you include the whole region
Assume all 40,000,000 ounces of palladium equivalent is sold for its current spot price of $2350/oz
= $94 billion
That is £67bn. Or £22.33 per share (what it’s worth now)
That’s not even including the cost to build a mine, or mine the metals. How anyone even gets to a number higher than this is using Monty maths or had a little too much tipple
Why would somebody pay more than the value of the metals? Normally it’s 8-10% .. (eg in this case £1.75 - 2.20) - not 150% as that’s quite ridiculous
Crawl back into your hole!
Definitely remove 50p from that value as well. Its pointless talking sub £1 when we all know it's well off the scale. The £35 is more believable than the 50p
Somewhere inbetween id bloody love. 3.50 is defo off the scale never mind 35 or 50 quid ha ha ha
Please ignore my.last post was not be sent. Anyway I can delete
Just looking at quick cals.
A sale price of 1.20 a share values the company 2.79 billion mcap. Seems pretty low to what they pote tially have.
A sale price of 3.51 a share values the company at 9.5 billion mcap. Seems a tad expensive for 20 billion of resources in value.
W