Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
chitling, you say, "Petroatlantic only services BP's Foinhaven field, west of Shetland."
I'd guess this is the same Petroatlantic which has just taken an offload from the Lancaster field and has the HUR board understandably excited. But BP are contracted by HUR to manage offloads from Lancaster so your key point on BP's potential involvement in the Sullom Voe STC facility is valid, and ,yes, good news.
I've expressed my doubts here about Sapphira's involvement in #41 offload from Kraken, but I've learnt not to preempt tanker movements. To another poster's point, there are a few tankers drifting around the North Sea, apparently due to delayed hook-ups, so Kraken isn't alone on this score. I suspected the Kraken 'breakdown' occurred at load #40 for reasons I've given previously. Sapphira's timing and potential involvement in #41 contradicted this view, so in a way I'm pleased to see this contradiction is now question. That said, I'd guess she didn't end up drifting around the North Sea to save on mooring charges - so the Jury's out on that one.
Keep up the good work. You're miles ahead of anyone else on these tanker movements.
This is very unexpected - the STS at Sullom Voe isn't for Kraken - the shuttle tanker Petroatlantic is due at Sullom Voe for a STS on Sunday.
This is actually very good news for Enquest - they have attracted BP to use their STS facility at Sullom Voe - this is the first time under Enquest's ownership that another oil company has used the facility.
Petroatlantic only services BP's Foinhaven field, west of Shetland.
You were right after all Beerbull, insider trading ;)
Let’s hope Dol, but I think it’ll happen when Trump needs a boost to his re-election. (Assuming China obliges).
E121,
There you are being half-full glass ...
It is -11M,
Crude Inventories:
Crude: -10.961M
May Kraken fill up your pockets.
10 mmbbls plus draw is what I'm reading on certain news feeds. Above the 4 mmbbls expected.
Well, the live charts look VERY confused with the API results lol
Yes, looks like a larger draw than forecast. Brent/WTI moving up...
Hi Beerbull, think it may be due to china trump trade talks and demand for oil not looking too bad
Oil climbing again, surely their is not a draw on the cards... that would be inside trading.
Sqiffys back,moan moan moan full stop.
Mr Squif
I don't know you from Adam but have looked in occasionally on the LSE Enquest forum because i'm a long term holder (still well under water but more optimistic of late)
I've often thought some of the other contributors give you a hard time when I genuinely think your heart is in the right place.
But do you really believe that any tanker watching comments on this board will affect how the share price reacts????
Come on - Don't give your detractors the ammo they don't really need
Squif
The tanker for the STS is due at Sullom Voe on Thursday evening so the hook up can be expected around the same time - that is a delay of just a week.
Also the STS tanker has a larger capacity than usual and the shuttle tanker is likely to be the large Heather Knutsen - so we may have a 600k load heading for Europe or India.
Sadly this forums obsession with tanker watching seems now to be hurting us. Down close to 10% from yesterdays intra highs as no sign of new tanker :-(