The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring Jeremy Skillington, CEO of Poolbeg Pharma has just been released. Listen here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Hello LTI. I'm not actually that desperate to know, so won't be turning the filter back anytime soon. Break even was defined without question, it was the only part of the document that interested me to be honest.
Thanks anyway.
Hello CB,
Sorry Imissed your 16:25 post. if you go back 2/3 years, Imperial has already explained recently, I believe, why he changed his poster name. You should be able to determin who he was from that.
With reference to your 18:08 post, we know that the document existed. We know ( or at least I know )it did not mention " Break-even." ( If you have seen the document you will know that.) We know that there were 10m connections within this document, which related to the term licence projection of Ultimesh revenue, over a 10 year period, which is not being marketed or sold now. And as such, the document/information has probably been deleted, because the information and the product, are obsolete.
Bullies of any kind, in my book, should be dealt with accordingly.
Inthetin - just to save me registering another post, what exactly does your link show? And if the solution and document are obsolete and out of date, why have it on the website anyway?
For what it's worth, I thought it was earlier also.
LTI.
Thanks Itt. It is actually newer than I thought !! ?
Hi CB
This is the link that showed the 10m units:-
https://cyanconnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/CyanConnode-investor-presentation-Sept-2018-v18-INVESTOR-v2.pdf
If the company could do the decent thing and reinstate it, that would sort it out.
Interesting day. The document does exist, it did have break even - after so many years at the then predicted run rate, and 10 Million connections was the Golden number. It was a 10 year chart, but I think it crossed at about 8 years.
Bullies will be supported, so long as they hold the CC nodding dogs line. All in, an interesting day. I'm not expecting an answer to 16:25 LTI, that would confirm way too much ; )
Here's to a Mahusive RNS tomorrow. Believe me, I'd welcome it, but cannot see it.
You are welcome jake.
LTI.
Hello CB,
With reference to your 15:54, please read again my post at 11:48 today. If you have seen the document at sometime, you will have noticed my comment that " Break-even does not seem to be mentioned anywhere." So where did the " break-even " come from that you have implied?
Or was it your assumption?
It is interesting that you should mention about bullies. My experience with bullies , or people who try to be bullies, is simple. When you push back, they are the first to complain. They do not like it. No " double standards " as you put it. It is just a fact of life.
LTI.
Thanks LTI appreciated.
What name did he post under back then LTI?
Hello jake,
It has been a long time since we had a chat. But to answer your question, I have known Imperiallondon for about 2/3 years, when we attended various AGM's/EGM's/Share-holder events. Both as share-holders.
As far as I am concerned, that is his connection to CyanConnode. As a share-holder.
LTI.
I do accept all that LTI. The document did exist, it was a business plan, and it did confirm 10 million connections to break even. What I cannot now understand is how CC, still without publishing a business plan, can now base break even at just 500k units as it is a new product against the old tech. If we had not had these conversations, we still wouldn't know what the plan is. Only time will tell, and that is never a good sign with CC.
Exactly Ted.
As far as I know, the link does not exist. I do not know if a link ever existed. It may have been part of a projector/slide show. It is an out-of-date projection document, on an out-of-date product/solution.
LTI.
LTI I was referring to Imperiallondon by the way.
Crikey, that's me done for the day, it's harder than going to work and no pay.
Newbies, disregard all this, you have enough proper stuff to read to make decisions.
Now that is daft BST, even you know that.
Just concentrate on what is happening and up coming or you might loose out again.
LTI, that's the point, I have seen the document. It would be a pretty wild guess talking about something that didn't exist? As for Imperial, I am most surprised that you of all people give him airtime. I really thought you took a dim view of bullies on here. Clearly if they bully posters that have a different view to yours, that's good with you. Classic double standards.
Just for clarity LTI can you or anyone else confirm he categorically does not have any or neverhas had any connection whatsoever to CC?
Why don't you just post a link that doesn't work.
Wake up, that man at the back, LOL.
Sorry LTI.
Hello CB,
So you have not seen the document and yet you have formed an opinion on what the document does not say? And you assume that I have not seen it. But Imperiallondon gave all bb posters some relevant information on the documents content and how to proceed should anyone require direct information.
Imperials post was dated January 6th, 2019. So follow the relevant/associated posts and make your own decision. That is all the spoon-feeding I am doing today. DYOR.
But just to clear up a final point, about what is in effect, an historic CyanConnode document. It is about Ultimesh, a product/solution that CyanConnode no longer market, sell or supply. As far as I know. It is not advertised on the CyanConnode website.
Any implications/understandings that you or anyone else would have gathered from this historic, Ultimesh presentation document, even if you had seen it, which apparently you haven't, would also be historic. Out of date. As it is out of date, it is understandable that it has been removed from circulation.
Just like the information on Ultimesh.
And an observation on Imperiallondon. Your comment about " And why would I have taken notice of what Imperial says." You should. As he understands more about the market that CyanConnode are working in and the CyanConnode products, than either you or I, or even a few others on this bb.
But his information, experience and opinions are dismissed by many on here, because they do not want to listen to what he has to say.
LTI.
LTI . So your line ' " Break-even " is does not seem to be mentioned anywhere.' does not actually derive from seeing the document? How can you possibly state that if you haven't seen it? And why would I have taken notice of what Imperial posts? Firstly,as you know, he is filtered, secondly, as you should know, he has no idea what he is banging on about with empty threats. If you have seen the slide, just say where we can all view it. If not, how you can comment is beyond belief.
Good afternoon CB,
I believe you have already been given some detailed information on the Ultimesh 10 year term licence projection, by Imperiallondon. With an explanation and details on what the projection shows. And also some advice on how you should proceed if you wanted confirmed information.
But the fact that you have asked me for details on where to find it, leads me to " assume " and I don't like to assume anything, that you still haven't seen it. And yet you still carry on insisting that it states/implies something that it does not.
With the information you have already been given, you know what to do.
But I will say this, if I was involved with a Company that had been subjected to some of the negative rhetoric that we have seen on this bb, by some, towards the Company, it's products and some of its directors, I would think twice about having a dialogue or sharing any information, share-holders or not, with them at all.
But that is only a personal opinion.
LTI.
Yet again tonyj, wrong, wrong wrong. I have always passed my own comment on its limitations in the volume market. It has a place, but low volume bespoke installs, which is exactly what we are seeing! I will be first on here if it gets a 5 Million, even 1 Million install order. Please try to read correctly, it is getting a little thin now.
Lol, he's just parroting what cc have told him to say
Hello LTI, I assume you have found the document, would you tell me where I can view it please?
Thanks.