George Frangeskides, Exec-Chair at Alba Mineral Resources, discusses grades at the Clogau Gold Mine. Watch the full video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Ignore the number of posts and I have not 'just rocked up'. I used to post under 'crizmo' but I have changed account on here as I was tired of people thinking they were Sherlock Holmes when they found my twitter handle (that I made not attempt to hide) so I now post under the same name as my twitter handle to avoid any confusion.
Paul
I have absolutely no problem with anyone taking a gamble on this share. As you rightly say "higher risk, higher reward". However I do post when I see a blatent mistruth being posted to ramp the share - like the statement that CTEA are in consulation with the government, when all they have done is contribute to an open forum.
I have said many times over the past year that investors can make money from ZIOC. It has always been a pump and dump share. Make your 40% and sell. However what you cannot deny is the CTEA have supposedly had a Covid app ready to go for over a year, and have not sold it to anybody, and that is why it is not a long term hold in my view.
All will be revealed in the next month anyway, as it will be clear by then which domestic covid passport apps will be approved and which international travel passport apps will be used by airlines and government borders.
I will quite happilly congratulate you then if you are right and CTEA announce a contract - as long as you also concede you were wrong if they still have not sold anything to anybody when the UK/international vaccine passport decisions are announced.
Deal?
Blaim...you may be right. You may be wrong. But you sound like a bitter former employee / contractor or colleague of one of the directors. Definitely a hint of personal grudge in the tone of your blanket criticism. Or perhaps you just rocked up here at random to "help out"? Yeah, right...
Blaim - well your low number of posts to date on LSE suggests that you're not quite as vocal as you infer, or, that if you are you must have multiple aliases. Hmmmmm..........
I think it's quite obvious we're separate people but believe whatever you like Paul. It's of no concern to me. I am quite vocal about most obvious lifestyle companies on twitter. #ctea, #ukog, #prem and a few more.
Blaim - so is it just this one AIM company that you provide your protect the gullible investor service on or do you cover them all.
Quite a job if you do them all given that investors tend to lose money on 70 per cent or so of AIM companies. Higher risk for higher reward. If it's just this one I'm wondering how you came to settle here - and whether you and Mitch one and the same.
I wouldn't buy this company if it were 0.01p. They will never make any money. 17 years and counting they have accomplished naff all. I habe no motive other than to stop gullible people being sucked in my the fluff and sometimes blatant lies put out by this company and rampers posting here and on twitter. If I saw something that pointed to this company being anything other than a pure gamble then I'd admit it. And if someone if investing on they pretense then fine. Don't make it out like this is anything else than that though. If you do you're lying or deluded.
You have overlooked our collaboration with z/yen .
Blaim - well it's good to see that you're confident enough to read his mind and speak on his behalf. But you don't really answer the question. I could find numerous examples of what I might see as dubious offerings on AIM but do I really want to waste my life posting comments on those boards simply to undermine the opinions of others when I have no financial interest in them myself. Everyone does everything ultimately to achieve a hoped for outcome. So repeatedly criticising a share in which you have no interest indicates to me some sort of personal grievance against the company or an effort to get others to sell and lower the price. And probably delusional on both accounts. If you can offer an alternative explanation then please do.
Mitch is just on here speaking sense, to balance out the many posts that only take into account the absolute best case scenario and usually mislead.
I see a lot of comments about 'our amazing tech' but none of you actually know about this tech. No-one does. Not me, not you, not anyone outside their 3 man band. No one knows about the infrastructure the tech runs on, nobody has even seen this world changing app. So to invest in CTEA based on a man's comments in interviews who, over a year ago, was proved to elaborate the truth is a massive gamble. The fact that no-one has agreed to pay for the product in over a year should tell you all you need to know about it. Blockchain this vlockchsin that. You can buy blockchain off the shelf right now. Then it just takes a few tweaks to make it gdpr compliant. So if I me, a front end developer and someone who is familiar with blockchain got together, we'd have everything CTEA have to offer for a minimal outlay. In a month or so. CTEA don't even own the IP for the app.
Mitch - do you actually own any shares in CTEA? If you do why don't you just sell and move on given that all you post about the company is negative. I can't understand why anyone would have such a derisory viewpoint if he/she was a shareholder as it's counter-productive from whichever way you look at it.
More info on the JV I think might wen the Government contract
https://excaliburhealth.co.uk/news/excalibur-creates-complete-freedom-passport-solution-for-mass-population-use/
Not quite as they missing the Deep learning add on that UK based CENS brings to the party.
In terms of trials don’t underestimate the usefulness of being able to provide an antigen test and an antibody tests as well as link into track and trace and NHS vax database. The testing enables those that have not yet had the vax to take part in trials.
CTEA are looking like a one stop shop for a pilot.
https://www.catenaeinnovation.com/bha-medical-joint-venture
Trek
Yes tuvok Nearly there but not cigar!!
I think we my have a surprise and a UK Deep learning covid JV will win the contract.
DYOR and GL.
I’m sensing a multi bagger here in the next couple of months. Ignore the trolls, most are ex holders sold at a loss and want the company to fail. RNS would be nice next week, but can wait if it’s May. Let’s see GLA
Is a complete doughnut who is very unsuccessful at investing hence why he wastes his previous time here trying to deramp!!
JV is a very really possibility here GLA
I’d also add...netcompany is Bluetooth based - now that’s a big lol (blockchain is most secure ledger technology obviously) and even their Danish version for their gov is still being developed. It’s a totally different kettle of fish ...a red herring!
IMHO DYOR GLA
Mitch ‘pie in the sky’ really - complete talk down *******s. There is only one other ‘competitor’ system that uses blockchain secure tech (in 2021 mist secure and preferred ledger technology) and they haven’t got a ready to go app. I’m not sure why you post on here if you’ve no belief in CTEA. As I’ve said many times, we are not simply focused on contract with NHS England/Wales - globally this will be rolled out for international travel and other countries will require for their citizens quickly - no time to develop from scratch which is where we can hit the ground running. We also could provide for PH Scotland. We can also provide for businesses and individual events globally. Time is of the essence for opening up global travel and economies. We need this to be up and working in weeks not years. We can do that NOW.
Plus I’ve done my own research and it’s wholly misleading to suggest Netcompany in running when in fact their input was months ago, contract ended and was a very specific small Covid testing project.
IMHO DYOR GLA
Sharebel - "CTEA are a British company and consulted by U.K. GOV Dept of Health " is totally misleading.
CTEA was not "consulted by" any goverment department. As DG73 says below "It was an open consultation. CTEA weren’t specifically asked personally, all companies in this sector were asked to participate."
I am not talking CTEA down. There may be a market for their app with private companies. However all these posts connecting CTEA with countrywide/government passport apps, whether domestic or international, is just pie in the sky.
"According to the Telegraph Michael Gove is in discussions with a Danish company about the development of a covid app to be ready by September."
This will be Netcompany:-
https://www.netcompany.com/en-GB
and is an example of the type of large established companiy every government will use for a domestic vaccine app. Netcompany are already tipped to be the supplier of the EEC app.
CTEA will not get anywhere near any government contract. Imagine the negative press if such an important app did not work correctly and it had been awarded to a company like CTEA with no offices, no income, and no experience of operating any app for more than a few hundred people in their tests.
Mitch - this is a Danish company and nothing to do with U.K. gov consultation - CTEA Catenae on the other hand WERE involved, are a British company and consulted by U.K. GOV Dept of Health from the perspective of a FUTURE SERVICE PROVIDER.
Here’s Guy the CEO to explain how their secure ready to go GDPR compliant ISO awarded APP underpinned by blockchain technology works -
https://www.catenaeinnovation.com/interviews
I suspect many on here are trying to talk this down now it’s been announced that Covid ‘Passport’ App is happening...
IMHO DYOR GLA
What people are missing here is that fact other companies might be interested in our data and what we have ongoing at the moment which would lead perhaps to a buyout or joint venture. Going alone at the moment for the app would take much more resources so what I have suggested would be a better option, let's hope management think the same.
I'm not so sure the government criteria is that rigid when it comes to who they award contracts to. Do you recall that multi million brexit contract given to that shipping firm in Dover (Seaborne Freight) and they didn't even own or run a ship!
So on that premise, anything is possible, ctea may get awarded some kind of contribution to the vaccine passport app if we're lucky.
According to the Telegraph Michael Gove is in discussions with a Danish company about the development of a covid app to be ready by September.