London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East and have access to Premium Chat. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Still waiting ABH.
ABH - can you give me the word for someone who unlawfully takes from others?
What about a word for someone who does tell the truth?
I can answer that Grotbox is a tool who still believes in Amits lies, oh dear he's going to be disappointed when the penny drops!
I will try to make this my last post here - my opinion stands - dormant company threads should have a shelve life - and it's not relevant if it bears or bulls because these shares are suspended - speaking from experience being in a few suspended shares myself over the years - sometimes it is hard to let go (of the argument) and only getting rid of the thread after 3-4-5 years will resolve anyone continued obsession with x company - we all eventually have to move on... hence my suggestion of a three year time limit of getting a thread on LSE .. GLA elsewhere!
What's your story then?
Member since 24th August 2018 and only ever posted re Cloudtag, and those posts are long after the de-list and nomad shenanigans that got the de-listing.
Posted in: CTAG
Hasn't even started yet!28 Jan 2019 15:45
Cloudtag fold? - I reckon the Cloudtag story is only just beginning and so do our 3 resident headless chickens, that's why they're here trying so hard - (but failing sooo miserably!) - they're a bit of amusement along the way tho I suppose..
Perhaps you would light to enlighten us all?
Lol, what a load of crap, dougal is long gone, it's the bears keeping this board active they can't stay away - have a look at the advfn ctag board, same story, winnies cronies posting crap daily to keep it alive, for them its not over - (either that or they're really lonely)
I think that's the reason why people such as dougal kept the bb alive, to keep it in the public domain otherwise the scammers will just get away with it without any repercussions. Scamit would love nothing better than for this bb to be deleted.
Actually, what LSE need to do is remove historic share threads after (say) three years - 99% of these old companies that were suspended or went into administration never come back - so if people still want to discuss x company then do it on general chat - I mean, otherwise CTAG could still have a thread active here in 2027 !!!
I see Scamit or his paid helpers are still busy getting posts deleted even though everything said are in the RNS's for the world to see, LSE really needs to grow some and stop helping the scammers.
2. What is "deferral of dissolution"?
A company should not be dissolved if there are certain matters still to be dealt with e.g. if there were to be legal proceedings against the company these would be seriously hindered if the company no longer existed. In the following situations the dissolution of the company would have to be deferred (postponed):
a. there is an administrative or Law of Property Act (LPA) receiver in office
b. there is a pension scheme which has not been finalised
c. the company is or will be the subject of prosecution or disqualification proceedings.
Take your pick
I see ct technology services has had its dissolution deferred does anyone know why this has been done
someone has lost 420k in here? That is absolutely disgusting that amit could take that. Obviously someone's pension pot.
and don't get drawn in by the rampers and bod's lies. It's a real shame that so many honest pi's lost a lot of money here, I know of one guy losing £420K unfortunately it's all history now.
Yes, the most important lesson to learn in this game is to take a profit when you can.
Hearing rumours of a buy out circa £1 a share.
Deals expected to land 1/4/21
All jokes aside, I got in here years ago at around 5/6p per, did very and sold my profits into the high teens. Was warned about getting back in at the drop and listened. Such a shame many genuine investors who had invested there hard earned money into this have turned there £ to dust. I remember one poster dedicating his entire life to it, presentations, his family savings, the lot.
If there's one thing anyone can takeaway from this and is reading here, its TAKE PROFITS when you can on AIM. Only a small % succeed, the games as b*nt as it comes.
My opinion only.
Good luck everyone on making some serious coins.
kinda agree soyo, but amit/hairy/knightsbridge
peeps will make sure that your posts get deleted.
Ah yes, giving extensive detail to easily identify the individual supposedly appointed whilst stating they couldn't be named for contractual reasons.
As if that could possibly happen in a bona fide business announcement by a legitimate company. All the other waffle couldn't be disproved at that time, but that idiotic incongruity was enough in itself to give a true measure of Amit without waiting for it to unravel by the supposed appointee posting on this board that he had not been hired.
So Amit, sorry Hairy, you've only ever posted on Cloudtag on this site, hmmm, I wonder why? Still positive of an outcome given all the lies, bullsh*t statements and potentially fraudulent activity?
No point for any class action as there's zero assets, all the money including the fake ipo have long been spirited away.
As for Dougal, I believe he was genuine but unfortunately it got to him in the end, deleting his account was probably the best thing for him.
I expect now without him this bb will finally die and rightly so.
Zero? - I take it winnies had second thoughts with his class action then... Why always so negative spike? cheer up bud it might come good yet, I aint giving up hope until the fat bird warbles.. (dougal's all over twitter if you're missing him?)
no, there was no warning or explanation. unclear if he chose to close
his lse account, or if e.g. he was banned for some posts on another board.
as to whether he was ‘genuine’, depends what you mean by that?
dougal sometimes claimed he had bought extra shares in the IPO,
but sometimes said that he did not. so clearly told some lies on
this board. all just moot now, as there is zero chance of any punters
getting anything back from amit or the ephemeral remnants of ctag.
Yes Dougal is genuine
Go get a cone and chill
Returning to this board after an absence of some time (to be honest it was getting kinda samey) I can find no trace of Dougal's
existence. Yet he was the one of the most consistent posters on here. For years. Year and years.
It feels like Hamlet without the Prince. Was any warning given, any explanation?
Do we think he was one of the long list of duplicitous identities? And are there any left? What about Hairy Grotbox has he gone too?
If there is no longer any end to even bother with these fakes doesn't that mean that it is all over? There is no fear of any kind, no need to steer opinion. Just a long slow dying on the vine?
Or was Dougal genuine? Thoughts?
what's happening Mr Fraudmaster??????
Didn't know that - thanks.
i don’t think you need to certificate your CTAG shares to claim
a loss for capital gains purposes? - it’s more about whether
HMRC agrees they are nil value at this point, in whatever form.