Stefan Bernstein explains how the EU/Greenland critical raw materials partnership benefits GreenRoc. Watch the full video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Thanks to stas I meant to say 👏👍
Absolute foo King shysters imo. 😡
Have to say a big thanks for all the good work - amazing!! 👏👍
I was a bit concerned by the leak of the RS report as it been so closely kept secret for so long.
It looks very much like now they have leaked the report themselves, knowing full well how damming and important this will be later on.
When I read this release, Stas is correct it has seven pages. I’m certainly wouldn’t have had the impact if it had been released as shown on their website. In fact, I would think he would’ve been dismissed. This was done to keep the liquidity in the market, as it wouldn’t have had any other effect at that time.
As time goes on, it’s looking more lightly that the investors in COPL. Where targeted by a well organised group of fraudsters, and I think it all started back when we bought atomic and then CUDA.
Enraged is an understatement. this is nothing short of just being mugged.
All of the effort to redesign the website and to contact potential suitors has been wasted. A lot of shareholders (including me) will be enraged at this latest development. AM really has to watch his back.
In fact Shouston as the text placed - "Further to COPL’s press release dated August 5, 2022 concerning the deep oil Discovery within the Converse and Natrona Counties of Wyoming, the following information is disclosed"
- then the fact it was a disclosure against a past RNS that would have had significant meaning, that in itself should have been RNS'd it was not. so to be honest outside of a forensic analysis of the document which could be done, the changes, whenever they were conducted, should have been announced. They were not.
Its the cover up that gets you Art
Montifino, I am not sure if the pdf the wayback machine are opening are as they were, I suspect the button is linking to the original document position, that is for sure but the wayback machine unless it had actually downloaded the original document in its original form would be of little use. The bottom line is we know for sure that the pdf on the copl website as being August the 5th news release is not as shown by the official RNS or SEDAR document. It has four additional pages.
Those 4 additional pages are damning, the text stating that the "The Total Petroleum Initially-In-Place (TPIIP) of 993.5 million barrels of oil quoted in our press release, dated August 5, 2022, includes Discovered sub-commercial (contingent) volumes and Undiscovered volumes of petroleum initially-in-place (prospective) and represents the 100% (gross) working interests. (COPL has disclosed reserves related information elsewhere." Is important.
Who would have been quoting 993.5 million barrels if we knew that number contained Discovered sub-commercial volumes, who would invest into volumes that are sub commercial. Bottom line the report on the COPL website has;
1. Been doctored
2. The page is entitled NEWS RELEASES, yet the document it links too was not the news release as released to RNS or SEDAR on the 5th August.
3. We don't know when it was changed, we can speculate but for sure the changes themselves were never RNS'd to inform the market that the 993.5 million barrels contained volumes of sub commercial nature.
I suspect it has been changed to reflect the leaked RS report
Lots of wealth for shareholders to recoup monies. The class action will surely succeed. Might need to wait a few years but money should be returned.
Yes the one document does seem to have been updated.
I find it strange that in a report issued on 5th August 2022 they add the text....
"Further to COPL’s press release dated August 5, 2022 concerning the deep oil Discovery within the Converse
and Natrona Counties of Wyoming, the following information is disclosed to provide further clarity on the
nature of the Resource Report referred to in the press release."
How can they state "Further too", when the extra pages have been added to a press released dated 5th August.
Art I hope you have a good set of lawyers
Another twist in this scandal. Along with many others, I am left confused. Surely the JVP had sight of the original RS report when it was published and yet it continued to engage. I can't believe it was acting only on AM's 'doctored' version. This mess just seems to get more convoluted as each day passes and as Stas has said all along, AM is up to his flabby chin, at the centre of all of this. It also bodes ill for all of COPL's directors and associates who would have known about the doctored report and been willing participants in this appalling deception.
Peter cannot be allowed to claim no responsibility. He is the CEO and surely will be implicated in the class action.
With a legal claim Peter Kravitz has a substantial wealth to contribute.
Peter Kravitz is our CEO. He needs to explain.
So is that it then. Nobody else will bid? They just increase productivity and make money 💰. Once sold
Surely there is something amiss here....I simply cannot see RS allowing information to be released to the stock market that is materially different from their report and not commenting on the information at the time.
The whole ethos of their business is accuracy in testing and they a trusted and renowned by the market.
If they have knowing allowed a company to disclose information that is not correct then they have a duty to report on it.
How could the market every trust them again if that's the case🤷♂️
Ok. This maybe incorrect. Wayback machine has 2 snapshots from 12 months and 14 months ago with the pdf as it appears today.
Hope everyone has sent personal emails and texts from art to cag as fca don’t care
I mean if we can’t get Arthur on this blatant fraud then I really do despair.
Arthur’s misled me repeatedly. I’ve sent all the emails / texts I’ve had from him in to the FCA. Encourage everyone to do the same.
There must be enough to get him surely.
To cover up the fraud.
All connected to COPL are wealthy. We will claim our money back through the class action. 100%
So the real report isn’t good and the released info from copl has been changed to con all investors? Was the leaked report yesterday the real one then? If there is no big find why are they all trying to remove us and have it for themselves? I’m confused as always
Well this has taken another turn, what a sorry state, personally I don’t hold any hope now for recompense. Hopefully jail for several of these fraudsters, I hope they’re having sleepless nights, I’ve certainly had a few but I’m over it now, life goes on.
I’ve spoken to them before on the phone and got the distinct impression that they were NOT happy with how their report had been portrayed / obfuscated by Arthur.
Unbelievable.
I think the legal team will have the experts on to this. You cant get away with document fraud. Its easy for the experts to trace.