London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Shorter, you have absolutely no idea what they are doing. Your cryptic responses are transparent.
In an earlier post you stated you do not read the RNS, so unless you are telepathic, I'm struggling to understand how you can even form a view.
insider info changed to gut insider info; you have form..............
You seem to think that you're playing the system and beating the big boys, but you're actually playing right into their hands and will soon learn another valuable lesson. Times ticking.
@shortbell--d
You are never off here you pri--! Do you think anybody takes you seriously FFS! You just clog up the BB with your self important cra_!
Hmmm he isn't usually this dumb. Think hes been on the whiskey.
Nope, simply trying to be educated as to how buying at a higher price than any so far possible sell price is a 20% gain.
Simple question really, and as you told us they loaded to dump and make this gain seems reasonable to ask yourself how you concluded this.
I think I am starting to see your genius in this.
So each time you (MS) or anyone that wants good gains you subsequently sell for less and that is how to GAIN.
So we can expect them to sell the ones bought at 24p for 22p right!?
Remet you do not read RNS and do not understand them. Direct quote from yourself.
Selling for less than you paid is normally considered a loss not a gain, but you seem to have a far more interesting take on profit and loss.
So in ShorterGuy school you buy an item for 31p and subsequently sell it for 24p and that makes you a circa 20% gain and are profitable.
Wow now I see where most businesses and myself have been going wrong.
No 31 - 24 is not a 20% gain. Please tell me you are not serious.
They bought high sold low and that gives them 20% profit.
Run that arithmetic past us all again!?
They bought in the 27.18 - 31p range (range for that day).
If they have since sold as you suggest we are still to see the RNS and it would have to be a sale AFTER that time.
I don't see any 20% rise since then.
They added to their holdings on 23rd, a day where the price range was above current levels all day.
Zero point in discussing further then eh Shorter.
I am not hear to wipe your ar*e.
Your screen has same info freely available and easy to access as mine or anyone elses.
Shorter hit us with your superior intellect in the loading up of MS.
Now just a heads up, look at the day they "loaded up" before you make a fool of yourself.
Look forward to an intellectual and fully detailed response.
Please please guys stop with the MS nonsense.
Have repeated this several times look at the RNS over last couple months.
We can NOT take any confidence from their dealings as they have been at this level many many times.
They go up down up down...
Only thing I can figure from it is they are biggest traders in the share and therefore likely partly responsible for a lot of the falls we have seen in the SP.
They have NOT shown confidence or significantly increased their holding etc etc
Maybe the shorters/blocked brigade/intellectually challenge on here should let MS in on what they know, I'm sure they'd be graetful to be informed about what they're doing wrong.
Morgan Stanley have increased their stake. Moving to more A Shares as well. Obviously they see the upside in this share, topping up again.
Would not be surprised if Jangho tops up as well.
From one of my tools apparently (728% from 23.8) so good profits to be made!