The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring Jeremy Skillington, CEO of Poolbeg Pharma has just been released. Listen here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
However, they will take everything I own for 2.5p a share. I wonder if someone has a large buy order in?
It’s not really been pumped at this point so hopefully just a bit of extra confidence in the company. Some positive news will help too - new products, new link ups and of course new link ups.
HL seem to have restricted purchases to 10,000 shares. Strange.
Has the tide turned? It's a long time since we've seen this.
Looks like vas and antha have bought back in:-)
I'm not a troll & that wasn't my first post (though it's been a while) i'm just not a fan of the ciggies & all i wrote stands. I was invested here a while back but got out. I wish you all the best of luck. I'll be back if the tide turns again.
Anyone would think that there might be some positive news on the horizon with the amount of new trolls appearing here???
Their fake fags are awful. They taste awful & if you think they do you any good you must be off your trolley (on something else?) The price is ridiculous too.
I've never seen such blind loyalty in a share before, even after crashing down 98% from its all time high of £1.08 to 2p, the "believers" won't allow any meaningful discussion if it doesn't follow the "happy clappy brigade" code of conduct-
1. Thou must never criticise Chill
2. Thou must never question the almighty BOD
3. Thou must believe everything the BOD says
4. Everytime the price falls further, thou must proclaim to all "it just means I can pick up more cheap (worthless) shares".
Praise be to BOD
i have to thank you for pointing out that zoetic was still active..
zoetic also has zero rankings for the key words and phrases like cbd and gummies ...UNRANKED ( as in the search came back with more than 100 other companies with a higher ranking ) !in how many years of trading ? as is chill.com also unranked ..but instead of simply having a divert script and cloning most of the old page they created a whole new page that is visually worse and has less products than the 1st ... then think this is a £5m small cap firm with 2 guys on 648k
why ? Maybe it's because they have a ton of unsold cbd oil with all the wrong labels on ? but not even in the top 100 ...SMH
oh the other site with zero web presence sorry
because i put brackets on the https so it wouldn't get blocked .. you can figure it out you are the stalker
ok lets do a website comparison of chill v another random cbd page that is highly ranked ...
(https://www).missionc.com/collections/cbd-gummies/products/immune-enhance-cbd-multivitamin-gummy-bears
note multiple gummy products and even vitamin supplemented .
on the chill uk page a few smokes and just 1 ONE tub of gummies FML lol one ?
wft..we are really taking on the world here ..no wonder the directors can justify 648 k a year a decade of work to produce 1 product of gummy less the healthy vitamins is pure genius .
oh the degree is chemistry . and i specialised in pharmacokinetics- bioavailability but still stupid enough to buy chill shares .
THERE YOU GO AGAIN ..i assume you are picking up on my grammar and typos ...but I am sure you have already done your stalking homework to know i have a degree, so do try harder , and answer this. Why dont chill have any web presence ?
its not like its a difficult question or even a difficult task to achieve running a multi-million pound company for a decade
why ?
This is all you have ..this is what the rampers do on all bb when they see that someone has figured out what is going on ,,i cam here to rant about how bad the company is re web presence and i get attacked by the local rampers... who have been raping the crap out of a **** company for years .or worse they actually believe the **** they are saying and are in complete denial the the dream is over.. i will say it again ...THE COMPANY HAS NO WEB PRESENCE !!!
WHY ???
when am i departing ? well when idiots like village pidgeon stop with the insults ...because atm i'm just finding this entertaining ....just maybe some of tHose Institutional investor will have a real look at whats going on here ..
1 ...no profit
2 no web presence
3 only 2 mysterious employees ( probably WAGS)
4 a hugh compensation package for the directors that appear to be incompetent ..
the only positives in this story are that the company does have II's or am i missing something here ?because looking at the s.p i am not the only one who gets whats going on here
over 200 actually do the maths then stfu ..if all you have is to stalk people then throw insults then you are one sorry fker
Conspiracy Theorist stays up all night sPoUTINg nonsense !! The LSE close of play figures are often miles out....I would also guess with all those tiny sells late on someone is keen to keep the sp low and we still have shorters, even at this low level sp.
I do not think maths is our fluffy creatures top subject...nor Grammar....but certainly incapable of influencing the sp at close of play.
Indeed, my tea leaves predict he will be gone as fast as he appeared, taking all his knowledge-base with him, bless.
To Putin’s Poster
If you had completed your primary school education, rather than the total nonsense you have been spamming the B.B. with, you could have posted some observations (see below)
Observation 1: On 4th August (one week ago, as I know you would find it difficult to work out when that was) the LSE Main Website omitted one trade from the daily totals, they said volume was 1,143,801 when the actual volume was 2,385,863. Now woolly poster get your calculator and work out what trade was missing. Did you get 1,242,062? You did? So, you can use a calculator. So why was it omitted? Yes, that’s correct because they were bought back today at 2.25p for £27,946 (cost them £4,968 which is a loss)
Observation 2: On 4th August there was a sell of 105,263 and on the 8th of August there was a buy of 105,263 and the cost to them was £289 (another loss)
Observation 3: This is for you to do some mental dexterity and work out how many other trades have been “bought back recently” since you became Putin’s Poster. (Hint just go back to when you honoured us with your presence on the Chill B.B.)
Observation 4: Did you notice on Thursday morning the LSE Main Website and LSE South East had us at number 5 on the Leader Board at 8:20am, why was that? Answer: At the close on Wednesday the spread was 2.1p – 2.4p so mid-point was 2.25p but LSE had the “previous days close” as 2.1p and at the Bell the M.M. had the spread as 2.0p – 2.5p so mid-point was 2.25p which is 0% but if you calculate it on 2.1p its +7.14% and that’s how we got on the Leader Board at number 5. Then M.M. moved the spread back to 2.1p – 2.4p and mid-point is still 2.25p and its +7.14%. But when we get to the close the spread is still 2.1p – 2.4p but it says +9.52% and that keeps us on Leader Board at the close but in position 35 out of 100. Could it be that your wisdom within your posting has an influence on our Leader Board position?
Observation 5: Now Putin’s fluffy poster appears on Monday 8th August 2022 and the spread over the past 5 days at the close is:
Friday 5th August 2022 2.1p – 2.4p + 15.38%
Monday 8th August 2022 2.1p – 2.4p 0.00%
Tuesday 9th August 2022 2.1p – 2.4p - 2.67% (but it should be 0%)
Wednesday 10th August 2022 2.1p – 2.4p - 4.11% (but it should be 0%)
Thursday 11th August 2022 2.1 – 2.4p + 9.52% (but it should be 0%)
So please enlighten us all as to why we have “Previous Close” as 2.3p? Is this so that when for the 5th day in a row when the spread is 2.1p – 2.4p we will open with a negative percentage?
RKB
PS When did you say you were departing, asking for a friend.