We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Pdub, of course I do not dislike you. I have no reason too at all. Some posters can be un civil, and at times belittling or even aggressive - their posts can be disliked, but not the person as they are unknown. Please accept my apologies for giving you any indication of dislike.
Beginerman I would imagine you dislike me as much as I dislike you. I suggest you filter me.
Roscon, why would anyone mention their health issues on a bulletin board set up to discuss investments in shares. It is unfortunate that anyone has health issues, I have my own but would not dream of detailing them on a bulletin board. Posters should stick to issues pertinent to the company in question.
I'm not asking anyone to accept my version, just explaining it. People can accept what they like.
Cindercone you are asking people to accept your version of why you had duplicate accounts (which I am prepared to do) yet in the next paragraph you dismiss Loudspeaker’s personal reference for GrahamWebb.
I’m afraid you can’t have it both ways. Unless you show respect for others why should anyone respect what you say?
For what it's worth I had one account for my main holding BMN and one for all my other shares. Actually, the other account was pretty much dead and hadn't been used for years but I reprised it, forgot to log out and inevitably commented on BMN under the wrong username. LSE looked at the posting history and agreed that was the case - therefore case closed.
Grahamwebb/Lawrence H's posting style is identical. The caps, the TICK TOCK boom nonsense. Might fool loudspeaker, not fooling me.
I’m not sure what explanation would explain why you would be posting at the same time of the day from two accounts.
I think what annoys the most is that I thought you were a reasonable poster at the time and felt sucked in by the fact you were posting from two accounts. Now I cannot trust what you post to be a genuine comment or something posted to drive a certain narrative that you want to pursue.
Like I say, a shame as I thought you were a genuine investor but your actions speak louder than words.
Anyway I leave you all to your weekend of ripping each other apart :)
@ Cindercone ..Graham Webb is a good friend of mine and is 100% guaranteed not Lawrence H.
Now please stop these ridiculous accusations.
That's not why I had multiple accounts. Again, LSE accepted my explanation.
I don’t have duplicate accounts. If I have something to say I use my one and only account. Explaining away a reason does not negate the fact you are obviously happy to create multiple accounts to present views opposing or backing up your argument depending on what your current investment strategy is.
"Grahamwebb/Lawrence H are the same person"
I don't see that myself.
Another big fuss over nothing. LSE accepted my perfectly innocent explanation, hence here I am. Considering it's glaringly obvious that Grahamwebb/Lawrence H are the same person and nobody bats an eyelid, I find such accusations all rather hypocritical.
“I've nothing to apologise for. I've been deliberately misrepresented”
Well if you were misrepresented then you should blame one of your self confessed multiple accounts
Chinny Reckon
I've nothing to apologise for. I've been deliberately misrepresented by long-term holders that have manipulated everybody into buying shares so they can profit by selling. If you want to fall for their rhetoric despite having your eyes opened that's your problem.
Cinder , watch those windows if you are going to throw stones
Ha, civility. Like when Sanchez lied about me ridiculing PDub's cancer diagnosis. He was in bed with Alfacomp for three years bashing everything that moved and he's got the gall to complaining about 'stalking'. One day people will wake up realise what a nasty piece of work this guy is.
What Ros said.
Good afternoon. I feel compelled to comment on the “stalker” post. Whilst I agree that this is a bulletin board for a share, it is also true to say many people here are long term and sometimes issues involve more than the share in question. Serious health issues are a fact of life whether young or older. There are long term “relationships” established and I would like to request a modicum of civility please. Thank you.
Roscon