The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode with Inclusive Asset Management's Alexandra McGuigan has just been released. Listen here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
http://criteo.investorroom.com/2016-05-04-Criteo-Reports-Strong-Results-For-The-First-Quarter-2016
Nothing surprises me with blinky nowadays. The only thing that would ever surprise me if it went up again.
With minimal volume. Bloody madness. The plot thickens.
So market makers happy to take your stock at 16.5 but don't want you to buy hence 18 offer. No prizes for guessing why!
"The company must be aware that the share price is being manipulated " curlykev i think they know about it and are in on it to
Never have I seen a market so cornered. I have watched l2 like a hawk and the ways the mms widen and close the spread and I can guarantee that a very big position is being filled. Everything I see points to a very positive upside to trading. Operationally things are infinitely better than a year or 6 months ago. Schroders posts are excellent. I am convinced that the company will show better cash than the market expects and that profits are beginning to flow. A current market cap ex cash of zero is insane. What games we can play in close periods. Be a smart investor and follow the Internetq timeline! The end game is truly nigh
Not a single trade goes through for over three and a half hours, while the MMs get their ducks in a row and then five A trades go through at the same time to bring the price down. What a disgrace. The company must be aware that the share price is being manipulated and still not a word.
Maybe that gives us a little hope. If it takes 2 weeks to fill, bearing in mind they took it below 16p for a time today. Maybe fishing for auto sells. Maybe one day. Lundon79. Hope you make a fortune on that purchase. ( For obvious reasons ) lol.
Good purchase IMO!
*was actually 16.36 but hey, who's counting
Order has been waiting for nearly two weeks to get filled at 16.5.. I must be mad, another c. 200k shares.. very illiquid mkt. could well drop more if outlook isnt any better than p1ss poor or BM continues to be a lame ceo and fail to win anyone over at the AGM. I'll be voting against his reappointment
Interesting reading some of the stuff coming out along side the FB results. 'Businesses are no longer asking if they should market on mobile, they're asking how'.. 'This is a massive shift that we ….' Sheryl Sandberg COO FB. Treasure trove of data allows targeted ads to be placed in front of users. $70B spent on mobile advertising last year. FB 19%, Google 35%. Everyone else the rest. Are we not 70% core now, which we believe to be mobile, and $80M of new business in this field. That's from a half built, half tested ramping up bit of kit. Not making excuses but just a little bit of that market will suffice and will make our £10M enterprise value look rather cheap six months out.
Thanks for that . Lets just pray that they are getting enough people looking to start making some money. It would be nice ( for start ) to have a quarter where they said we are making "real money" and instead of our cash pile shrinking it is growing again. Wonder if I will live to see that day.
rusty - the ranking always used to be done on the people metric, although they seem to be de-emphasising people in favour of uniques in the "new" Quantcast, so maybe they're moving or have already moved the ranking metric to uniques. The reason for using "people" I think was that it was a measure of reach - how big the audience is, which ties in with how they measured other advertising media (TV, film, radio). If they are now moving to "uniques" then that maybe just because of the practical difficulties of coming up with algorithms to reduce uniques to people now that "people" have so many devices and so much is done on mobile devices and within apps. "page views" are measuring something else - important perhaps for us in assessing the monetisation opportunities of blinkx, but not a metric that has typically been used to understand audience size. So blinkx' Quantcast network ranking can go down because its audience shrinks relative to its competitors, but at the same time it can still have more monetisation opportunities because it's audience is loading more pages on average.
From Tractorhead, then Quantcast page views soaring from 1GW what the hell does it all Mean, Surely if page views soaring it would go up ?? Am I missing something here. Help.
FWIW a huge step up in R1 (and in particular AdKarma segment) page views recorded by Quantcast during April. More details in my post on the ii board if anyone's interested.
Sometimes due to work commitments personal circumstances etc it is not possible to get to A.G.M for you to even insinuate that management think things are fine would suggest living in cloud cuckoo land. It is quite clear that everything isnt fine. The share price the E Mails the contacts to Dan and anyone else who might listen would suggest that. If I can get time off work I will try and get there, but last year I wasnt given the time off.What would you suggest in that situation. ?
WHAT THE HECK?
If this isn't a price to buy back the shares then we are stuffed anyway. And as for consolidation based on previous purchases who would trust this lot with 1p more.
The reason I asked if that was a positive or negative article was when I emailed the company and asked about why there was no share buyback they sent me a link to me I think this more positive is the negatives, still utterly refuse to answer the question what is core and non-core products use the excuse results coming out soon and in a closed period what about the rest of the year when the not closed period.
If company is turning in a real profit and is no longer heamorraging money then price will go up again and any share buybacks at this price will be very very good value and great for shareholders. If the company is in fact a lame duck that doesn't make money a share buyback will be no good, but it will reduce the funds available for them to buy more crap. If it is the latter then it really doesn't matter as Brian will be ableto use up the funds either way. No doubt after A.G.M we will get the usual Oh they have voted for a share buy back. That isstandard practise every year. What I would like is for them to use the powers they already have to show they do have confidence and have turned the corner. Shares could then be held in treasury in case needed at a later stage or cancelled which means less in existence. Just need to see some action. Anything. Even a positive update would be something for this lot. Anyone going to A.G.M really needs to give this lot a hard time. Would be very very surprised if Tosca didn't have something to say.
Out of interest would you say that this research is positive or negative to impact of a share buyback? I mean the yes camp The value of share buybacks By Richard Dobbs and Werner Rehm Companies shouldn’t confuse the value created by returning cash to shareholders with the value created by actual operational improvements. After all, the market doesn’t. lots more blah blah to here between the first and last paragraphs In most cases, buybacks create value because they help improve tax efficiency and prevent managers from investing in the wrong assets or pursuing unwise acquisitions. Only when boards and executives understand the difference between fundamental value creation through improved performance and the purely mechanical effects of a buyback program on EPS will they put share repurchases to work creating value. http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/the-value-of-share-buybacks
What do you mean up to 6th place? Were we not at 6th last month? Have unique views gone up in number do you know? I can't firgure out the archive feature to loo at previous months...
1R up to #6, just behind radiumone.. And not far off criteo now. http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Market-Rankings?keywords=&tag=&country=US&publishdate=l1m&searchBtn=GO New format, so click/tap on the first drop down list, amd select "Top 25 Ad networks"
Facebooks ad revenues soar.... http://www.reuters.com/article/us-facebook-results-research-idUSKCN0XP234