Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Tim - also said? What are you implying? Why is this relevant to this thread?
I said it looks like a scam because it looks atrocious, amateurish, coincidental, worse than their Medusa19 site, below par, childish, etc.
My view. Like I said the other night.
BITL also said last night that the Medusa-19 life sciences website was a scam because their website used WordPress. Still waiting to hear the details as to why it's a scam?
Let it go, NDN71. What's done is done. The future remains very bright. Let's concentrate on the future, son.
Fair enough
This was quashed in the previous presentation. The SP halving presentation.
Basically, there’s no market for the hybrid test. Makes sense when ours it’s nigh on perfect for the use case.
Even though they said they’d be working on a test together?
https://www.investormeetcompany.com/investor/meeting/business-update-and-qa
June business update (one week before Gates takeover):
Q17: Are Mologic a competitor with their own LFT and how will this partnership benefit Avacta when it comes to sales. What, if any, benefits will there be from GAD’s contacts?
Our partnership with Mologic covered the development process and does not include commercialisation of AffiDX. We are working with GAD on the manufacture of the AffiDX test not on commercialisation. GAD’s primary business focus is on Low and Middle Income Countries which, because of price points, are not a focus for Avacta.
AS. Quite careful to separate the two companies IMO.
No. Their relationship goes back to 2016. My point is that I don’t see Mologic requiring Avacta (affimers) to develop an LFT. I.e Gates and co. Will not be buying Avacta.
They have their own test.
Hang on…. Maybe ive been off this page too long to follow this; are you suggesting there’s no link between Avacta and Mologic?
Sorry, maybe wasn’t clear :)
Oh, in that case, I totally agree with you.
Why would Mologic need Avacta when they have their own very good test. Thats my basis of a link being a stretch.
BITL what exactly is a stretch? Surely you remember the news?
https://mologic.co.uk/mologic-to-become-a-social-enterprise-after-acquisition-by-social-impact-funders-and-investors/
And the FDA submission for their test went in 2nd July.
https://www.omegadx.com/News-Events/Omega-News/entryid/98
I am interested to see whether a deal was agreed whereby Mologic gets USA and Avacta U.K., but who knows?
I’m with you on this Agent. These links to Gates/Mologic are a stretch. Why the Fascination?
Contracts can have TO clauses - almost certainly when distributors are involved.
Sorry *real = rival
After their takeover of Mologic, why exactly would Gates/Soros need a real company to be involved? And ig Gates /Soros need affimers (for example) why do we need Medusa 19 and why is HUA a taking so long?
Are you saying that the deal will have been cancelled by Soros and gates after their takeover of Mologic? It would not be possible for them to cancel a previously signed agreement….
Yep, that was May. Then in July, this happened:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/daviddawkins/2021/07/19/george-soros-and-bill-gates-backed-consortium-to-buy-uk-maker-of-covid-lateral-flow-tests-for-41-million/?sh=542efc8c2687
Avacta and Mologic announce commercial partnership MAY2021
Yes, they are in a similar position to us, only with the weight of Gates/Soros behind them.
FROM OMEGA
Regulatory approvals in the US and CE marking for self-test use for our VISITECT(R) COVID-19 Antigen test will provide the catalyst for sales opportunities. We recently announced submission for CE marking for self-test use and we are now waiting for our European Notified Body to complete the review of our submission. MHRA approval for sale in the UK is expected to follow soon after CE marking for self-test use is confirmed. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is reviewing the Mologic submission for professional use for the same test, and we expect a positive outcome for both submissions.
Advancement towards further regulatory approvals and commercial progress for the AbC-19(TM) rapid test continues. We had hoped for further news to update shareholders with on this progress, however the prospects for this test have not changed and we still believe there is a significant opportunity for this COVID-19 antibody test.