We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I find it absolutely nuts that at this stage we are still looking at tealeaves to try and understand what is going on. I've not got the need for the total blackout level secrecy all the way through. By rights Avacta's IP will be integral to this initiative, but blimey, I wish there was just a bit of transparency.
Just catching up here and wow, this confirms it must be Avacta. Nothing else makes sense and add everything else into the equation (timelines, delay, holy grail from summer) then just wow.
Correct. Bit weird though eh? Mologic are named, yet not named but have entered in to a contract with 'someone' to access their IP, perhaps 'someone' aren't listed on Page 40 as they're a third party and have a separate contract with Mologic.
Good work Detective JRDC - lol! But seriously it cannot possibly be Innova though given their awful performance and dire press coverage. Ignoring our best in class, home-grown pedigree the Govt wouldn’t dare . . . would they?
@PL well by that logic, unfortunately, Avacta aren't in the alphabetical order list anywhere
Mologic named again in 3.7, they must already be in a published contract.
That was freaky Mikey...
Is the lack of redaction for Mologic in 3.1.10 a mistake?
Mologic are redacted on page 40. Given the alphabetical order, it’s pretty pointless :-D
Page 40 of the doc seems like Mologic..? what's going on !
Doze, yes via mologic hopefully!
Livedataaccount-re 16.37 post, I thought the government would have PD CV for affimers under non disclosure but this redaction will cover them ahead of AVCT gaining ISO 13485 and using our Spanish CV
The numbers required by the government
Avacta are the only company that can guarantee reagent supply .
Affimers are the Holy Grail with No competition.
Surely the cat cannot jump into another bag this time :)
Will this be the usual rise on Friday and dump on Monday ?
Innova aren't listed and they're plastered all over the place so no need to censor them.... as mentioned earlier, listed company IMO
3.1.10 redaction is interesting.
https://twitter.com/EggySoldier/status/1390688916819386368?s=20
@Pennyfortheguy: "Oh, so it can’t be Mologic, as Mologic is explicitly mentioned as a third party!"
Mologic, surescreen, novacyt, imo those names are too large to fit in the redacted field for there to be equal distance text size between each word.
Avacta fits. As does Innova.
I was thinking all those black redactions could equally be hiding the name Mologic.
But then I thought, why would that be redacted? It’s not exactly sensitive information for Mologic to be revealed as the supplier working with the manufacturer THEY set up.
Avacta on the other hand, being a listed company and all, would be considered very sensitive...
https://twitter.com/downunderfutbol/status/1390687925248172034?s=20
"For me its because its been updated with todays date and full contract given with "services commenced" ;) "the contract award date reported in the Awarded Information Section refers to the day before services commenced as opposed to the date on which the contract was signed.""
All round, this is panning out to be one of the best ever days for AVCT. Bring it on !
Could be Monday - Boris due to talk about masks in schools.
Grant Shapps at 5pm today...talking travel and tests...
Lots of news coverage Sunday re UK home grown LFT...
Avacta RNS Monday...
Well that's just my guess...
Go on, make my weekend!
Lets have a red dot!
Imagine being out and an RNS titled "It's us" lands, ouch