We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
RealAnalyst,
My interest in ANGS dates from after GL's arrival, so I have no first-hand knowledge of anything earlier than the Spring of 2019.
Ocelot
Er....no...the Kimmeeidge,we were assured by the then ceo was certain to produce and produce massively:
"Balcombe isnt star wars,Brockham will be stat wars.We just need to turn the taps on"
"We will definitely be producing by the end of the year(2018)".
"Angus is a production company not an exploration company"
J2-are you going to leave any for me? I have plans to add significantly here. with some liquidity later this week or next I will start adding. anything below 1p is good. very confident for a return of 100% within 6 months. My strategy is top slice at 2 p plus and leave the half for further increases to may be 5p.Good luck.
That sounds like a very NICE position - best wishes
That sounds like a very position - best wishes
Its beyond reasonable doubt that the doom gang got it wrong in the past and its repeating its mistake. The malicious hatred is visible to all . Do we care about the distorted vision? NO I have been quietly adding. Have a % here now. A few more million and I will have to mandatory declare my 3%. I intend to take my stake to 2.99% this month.
It's curious, one would expect a certain humility from those who openly admit to having got ANGS wrong in the past.
Instead of which, the fact they got it wrong in the past seems to have convinced them they will get it right in the future.
The past, for some of the derampers, is one of having got ANGS wrong.
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." (George Santayana).
There is a structural pattern,where the past can indeed be used to judge the future.
---------------------------------
So, presumably, from about 35p, this structural pattern was indicating "sell".
As you can see, haven't filtered gkb47, have no objection to hearing alternative views, but don't want to hear them repeated all day long.
Signing off now. Have a good weekend, too.
ocelot,
I relunctantly filtered gkb for that very reason.
Not averse to alternate views, but some views are just too skewed and aligned to known disruptive sources to suggest an open mind.
good weekend
And on that note, I'll wish you a good weekend!
You're an independent, gkb47, who often finds himself in agreement with the derampers.
ocelot,
Your rational points mean nothing to those who have no interest in ackowledging that there has clearly and definitely been a change in the company management and focus since GL took over.
It is tiresome to hear every day and a clear indication of the bitterness seen with the continual agenda of arrogant Alan and his acolytes.
The constant stream of negative thread titles such as this says everything.
Angus will be judged on current operations and the success (or not) of the projects under consideration by the market (rightly so), and I, for one, am happy to remain ivested to see the fruition of these aims (well, just Sf for me).
Yes, it is risky, but if anyone investing in AIM does not see this, then that is noone's fault but their own.
Apparently, if you lose money on AIM it is better to take out a court case against the company than accept responsiilty for your own nvestmet decisions. If you are winning, then everything else doesn't matter.
The posters who we both appear to have filtered have nothing worthwhile to offer here as they have zero ability to acknowledge any change here and apply any logical interpretation of the company announcements as to future activities and direction.
Their blinkered and clealry biased views are based only on past experiences, the desire to bring the comapny and bod down at any cost (due to failed action), and their desire to be shown to have called everything, which is all important for an arrogant few whose ego and 'being seen to be right' is more important than anything else.
I'm sure the gang's whatsapp group will be coming up with some new bashing ideas for next week.
Having said that, Brockham's Kimmeridge must surely have been exploration.
If that's the case, then I withdraw my comments suggesting ANGS's oil assets were exploration assets: it's true that I know little about Lidsey and what I know about Brockham is, essentially, the RNS of 28/06/19.
There is a structural pattern,where the past can indeed be used to judge the future.
-------------------------------------
Not so easy to apply in ANGS's case:
1/ new management team;
2/ Saltfleetby is gas not oil;
3/ Saltfleetby is production not exploration;
4/ Saltfleetby is in Lincolnshire and not in the Weald basin.
It is also possible for a team to win the premiership after 30 long years of trying.
You got to be in it to win it.
'It is, therefore, the future trajectory of the share price which will be the judge.'
The future always becomes the past; and the past has judged this as a bad investment to date.
--------------
And previously the market judged it to be a good investment, when it rose to 35p.
The market is capable of changing its opinion about a stock.
Baits
Past performance is a vital criterion used to judge future performance in many different spheres of life...would you say that just because a club is in the lowest division and has lost 90% of its matches in the last 3 years,that is irrelevant?
That such past performance should be discounted,because you want it so much to be in the premier league?
If you're hiring a new employee and they have atrocious reports from previous employers,should a company simply ignore that track record because it's in the past??
There is a structural pattern,where the past can indeed be used to judge the future.
'It is, therefore, the future trajectory of the share price which will be the judge.'
The future always becomes the past; and the past has judged this as a bad investment to date.
Trouble with you MichaelGoodwill is that in the past you lost money on Angus and you can not get over it.I suggest your group lend me your money and I will lose it for you that way you can not blame yourself.Oh but you never did blame yourself did you you blamed somebody else for your loss.AIM is not for you or the group you are in AIM is not for cry babies.
We have 2 diametrically opposed camps, no meeting of the minds is possible.
It is, therefore, the future trajectory of the share price which will be the judge.
Baits
Give it a rest with the personal attacks on Alan!
By all means criticise our arguments and point out how you think we are all wrong..that's what this forum is for...its not for spiteful personal attacks...all that does is confirm you've lost the argument!
If you think financial analysis of the companies accounts and strategy is 'boring' maybe you shouldn't invest at all..because if you arent prepared to do the analysis,or listen to people who have..you will make lousy investment choices and lose the lot!
Alan I will say this one more time.People who bought in in the last couple of weeks are not interested in what happened a year or two ago including myself,your posts are boring,like I said get a life and do something useful with it.BTW Sconny I know all about Angus from IPO up to today.I need nothing from you or Alan or anybody else in your band of losers.If all you can post is very very old news then you have nothing to offer in here.I am sure those that bought recently have done their homework.