London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
You will only have one login account. Registering with multiple accounts is not allowed. Any user found to have more than one account on this site will have all, and any future accounts suspended permanently.
Your email and password must only be used by you. If a post is made under your account, it will be considered that it was posted by yourself.
Your account nickname must not be the same, or contain, listed company names or board members' names.
While debating and discussion is fine, we will not tolerate; rudeness, swearing, insulting posts, personal attacks, or posts which are invasive of another's privacy.
You will not;
discuss illegal or criminal activities.
post any confidential or price sensitive information or that is not public knowledge.
post misleading or false statements regarding the share price and performance. Such posts are deemed as market abuse, and may be reported to the appropriate authorities.
post any private communication, or part thereof, from any other person, including from a member of the board of directors of a listed company. Such posts cannot be verified as true and could be deemed to be misleading.
post any personal details (e.g. email address or phone number).
post live price or level 2 updates.
publish content that is not your original work, or infringes the copyright or other rights of any third party.
post non-constructive, meaningless, one word (or short) non-sense posts.
post links to, or otherwise publish any content containing any form of advertising, promotion for goods and services, spam, or other unsolicited communication.
post any affiliate or referral links, or post anything asking for a referral.
post or otherwise publish any content unrelated to the board or the board's topic.
re-post premium share chat posts on regular share chat.
restrict or inhibit any other user from using the boards.
impersonate any person or entity, including any of our employees or representatives.
post or transmit any content that contains software viruses, files or code designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of this website or any computer software or equipment.
If you are going to post non-English, please also post an English translation of your post.
If you are going to post non-English, please also post an English translation of your post.
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium and Verified Members
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East and have access to Premium Chat. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Don't remember any misunderstanding re costs (but can always be mistaken, of course).
Think you are being unreasonable, Ja51, don't want management time to be too absorbed by answering the questions of a shareholder of 1 share in the company, currently valued at the princely sum of 0.675% of a penny.
I think you find you thaught they were liable for the costs at Balcombe also ocelot? Just offering them an opportunity to correct a mistake I may have made......I don't think I could be any fairer really do you?
Ocelot A couple of the questions I asked related to discussions we had and as you know, the answers supplied turned out not as you had expected. This illustrates how easy to interpret poor information issued in RNS'S perfectly! I not aware that I have got anything wrong and given them an opportunity to correct something they must feel pretty strongly about to publish the comments they made!
If they felt strongly enough to actually publish and respond to that ridiculous question regarding myself I'm sure they will welcome the chance to put the story straight.It seems only fair to give them the opportunity to correct anything I may have posted incorrectly. You know I tend to attach links to back up my position and would welcome any information even if it proves me wrong.
I sincerely hope Angus are not going to waste shareholder funds trawling through your 1374 posts to ascertain everything you have got wrong. Perhaps you will be willing to reimburse them for the costs they would incur in educating you?
Q&A Response AS far as I'm aware I have not posted anything that is wrong on this BB! I have had more than my fair share of discussions and the share price is where it is for a reason. I have submitted the attached to the Q&A for the company to respond to anything they think i have got wrong.
It seems only fair that if you feel I have posted wrong information on LSE you have the opportunity to correct it. Could you please correct anything I have posted which you feel is wrong and warrants an explanation. Ja51.
My first name is quite obviously not Ja51 by the way offtheball and definitely not trying to get in lower...lol
I am more concerned with the Saltfleetby CPR, as I have posted a couple of times before, and see here (rather than Balcombe) as where we are most likely to see a more sustainable boost to the SP. Still feel we are looking at September, or Q4 before anything operational there though. Hopeful that the March planning for Balcombe does not get postponed and a favourable outcome will see a return of some interest for any currently watching from the sidelines, and any potential new investors. Meanwhile, will continue to hold
That's fine by me Crocqman, Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I see it as this person having no investment here and is constantly posting negativity wether on this board or in the investor questions for his own gain ( A lower entry price ). This isn't helping my investment or the view of possible new investors looking in here. This share isn't going to be 0.6p if and when Balcombe gets the go ahead or we receive the CPR regarding Saltfleetby. A last ditch attempt to get in lower if you ask me. GLA genuine investors.
Disagree ontheballl, I don't see the benefit of referencing a bb poster in a question. I know they may be trying to be transparent, but feel they should be able to exercise their discretion and have a process to edit a question (without changing it's intent) in certain circumstances. For the Q submitted on 20 Feb (currently 4th one down), why not just leave it as 'a poster on the LSE forum chat board', and why respond directly to name the question submitter in the one seen above it? imo, that question (4th down) should not even have been put up on their IQ section as what is the relevance of posting that someone holds 1 share, or how many posts they put on a public BB? What would this even mean to anyone outside of the LSE forum? It does just seem really petty and unprofessional for the company to act this way.
Additionally, the latest question (added 28 Feb) starts 'An eagle eyed board poster'. Outside of this BB, what relevance does the phrase 'board poster' have to anyone else? An analyst, media person or some other interested party would most likely not have a clue what this is meant to be about. The IQ forum is not the exclusive domain of LSE members so far as I am aware, although it may seem that way at times!
What started as an interesting idea to be open and create a dialogue to investors outside of official news, could quickly degenerate into something no different to what is often seen on these very boards. The company needs to take some care in how they utilise this IQ initiative going forward, otherwise I can see them taking it down citing abuse of the spirit of the initiative from outside sources which would be a shame.
Some good Q&A responses. If I were Ja51 I’d be pretty embarrassed. That said I doubt he is as an “investigative journalist”. I wonder whether there is a hint there after I recently asked whether he’s associated with Drill or Drop. Well Ja51 has definitely drooped this evening after that put down. Angus didn’t answer my Q about JTP’s consultancy role, ho hum. Can’t have it all.