The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring Jeremy Skillington, CEO of Poolbeg Pharma has just been released. Listen here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
LINVESTOR you don t half talk a lot of sh8t. Lets help you. This isn t JPM money its their clients money. That client money, doesn t get 'punted ' like throwing bread at ducks like you infer. In fact, they have teams who all combine to determine an investment strategy for their clients money which goes through various gateways and then sign of st Director level. The same at Byrook and/or any other IM involved oast or present. You haven t got a clue.
She’s factually incorrect! She’ll end up getting sued herself if she’s not careful.
"Take a look at DebtCamel, lots of posts stating they are voting no due to the low amount of compensation."
They'd be fools if they turned away free money by voting NO and got bu66er all because of the alternative of possibility of going into administration, utter fools. I believe the 700000 former customers will carry the YES vote. Just sayin'.
I stopped reading DC because the woman's ridiculous advice/comments wound me up!!
So it's topping up time for me :)
McFx
Motif ptsd !!!
:D
There's always been a lot of talk of JPM "investing". I have always been of the opinion that it is a great thing for us that JPM are "buying" but I have never been of the opinion that they have been buying for themselves. Their buying has pushed the price up, showing huge confidence in the outcome here... by someone. Could be JPM, could be someone else. I don't happen to think that "someone" is JPM (buying for themselves). Does that change the fact it is a good thing? Not for us. Not at the moment. I do, however, consider that it may be someone with ulterior motives and I know I am not alone in that. Someone with very deep pockets reckons this is undervalued and the truth will out down the line. As usual, just for balance, one needs to consider the possibility that this is not being backed by JPM themselves, just bought/held by them. For what it's worth... it doesn't bother me. Yet. I am also starting to think a lot of the vote is now priced in, hence kicking myself for not getting back on my target day (not price) when it dipped to around 15.3p (I think), 3-ish weeks back. Part of what kicked off my Motif PTSD is that it will look very pricey in the unlikely event the vote fails. I will, however, be taking the ride across the vote/court and be considering a top up if it dips (Mon/Tue). I do suspect we may stall as everyone who's out over the vote stays out and everyone who's in, stays in (obvs)... I do expect some of the recently bought gamblers to sell the news on Weds and again on the 19th. That doesn't mean it won't get bought into by holders though, which will bring price stability. GL LTH - we've been waiting a long time for W/C 10th May. If the vote passes, I am certain the court will pass it. Maybe some slight changes in 'fairness' but they won't bankrupt them when their customers have asked for it to go through. Courts don't do that. It's not in the majority of creditors/public interests.
Good luck to them.
I’m not pretending to know anything just saying it is silly to think someone wouldn’t want the deal.
@JjAbraham
But you don't know that (unless you know someone within the company), whats the point pretending to know?
You THINK it will go through, I think it will go through but telling everyone it WILL is just not true.
Take a look at DebtCamel, lots of posts stating they are voting no due to the low amount of compensation.
WHEN NOT IF
This is going through and if it’s good for jpm it’s good enough for me as well.
@GolfGains
I'm afraid this is not true. JP Morgans have investments go bust every day. They have different types of risks.
This isn't a deramp, its just you shouldn't see JP Morgan investing as a sign that the vote will be won, its a sign that they think the potential could be huge IF the vote is won.
am with you stevie , I never thought this would get to where we are before the vote am 150% up, my intension was always to hold but this has got me thinking, boom or bust (yes or no) personally I think the vote will get a yes.
I think he meant lost change ‘past tense’.
Heck yeah it will change many peoples lives soon enough.
Jim. He means 'Loose', as in 'Loose change'.
London, you mean lose!!!
This is going to make some very rich IMHO. JJ
**loose
The investment here from JPMorgan is peanuts, its lost change for them.
Its just a punt they could easily wipe off.
Clintek, that is sensible and I get it but I suppose I am just greedy and want the max from what I've put in.
I'm a gambler, can't help it.
I didn’t think we would be here before the vote either clintek.
Only my initial investment Stevie. Keeping the 156% profit locked in and that is still quite a considerable amount. I never thought it would get to this b4 the vote and thats what has shaken me tbf.
Clintek, we've been with this for yonks!
It's **** or bust time! We knew this time was coming, I'm holding mate but I wouldn't blame anyone for cashing in.
You know which way it will go if the vote is yes, it's hard but the reward will be huge!
Good luck pal, only you can decide what to do.
Thanks ….. I think
: )
Actually mark, I bought in at 13.2p i believe (On your word) so in a strange turn of events you were really wrong but it ended up right. I averaged down to 10pish when it got really bad and now here we are.
I actually learnt alot from you and indirectly you have made me quite a few quid.
Cheers and I would now say you are an ally.
Cheers
Gallows humour:
On the plus side if we do go into administration ( very very unlikely) when the borrowers who listened to debt camel find out they will get bugger all after the priority debtors are paid. They will be fuming with her :D
Which makes my point clintek I bought back at 19.9p! So that’s where I see the risk v reward.
Mark..We have never clashed on the info you have provided.
The info you have given has always been factual, honest and intellectual.
Why we clashed is because you were sometimes in Amigo and sometimes out, When you were in it was all positive and when you were not it was underhand positive..example.."I love this share...BUT" I listened to your advice in the beginning and it hurt to the paper lose of £50k (Not your fault, my fault)
The clash was me catching you out and you then admitting you were day trading Amigo. (Which of course is fine too)
Clintek risk v reward. You n I have clashed a couple of times here. I bought back in at 19.9p that tells you where I’m at with this right now ( I bought at the price I would usually sell! )