We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Hi Mcmikeyh - but if fuel cells are used then the byproduct is water again so a circular system
71% of the planet is water so, I think Adam bond will have come up with another solution by the time it's below 10%. :-)
Anyway, aren't sea levels rising anymore?
I would disagree that the sea is a huge free resource itsallbull. At the end of the day if that resource is gradually depleted then it will be harmful to the planet. It may take another few hundred years to do so but it will.. just saying is all..
Fully agree MIKODX. We have been waiting along time and now we are cresting the hill.
AFC have continued to make developments although some believe not quick enough. The hydrogen economy is coming and AFC appear to be leading the way in low cost power solutions and now Alkaline Electrolysers with some pretty serious applications.
Yes Southerhay, ships have to fuel in ports, the bigger ones burn heavy crude fuel oils in the engines for power to move and supply electricity on board. The engines on a lot of the bigger ships keep running in ports just for electricity polluting the air around the port cities instead of cost restrictive plugging into the grid. The ocean is a huge free resource of seawater they can utilise as a clean fuel for either a hydrogen fuel cell engine or an electric one making it totally autominous, never having to refuel in ports, only coming in for supplies and passenger movements.
Like Cheeky said, H2 could be piped onshore through existing pipelines with the possibility of electrolysers being placed on redundant oil rigs or even current ones. There is a huge market from offshore seawater power.
That's why we're all here. Except for some who want it now.
This calls for a topup at this ridiculously cheap price. Hydrogen energy is the future and it starts now. Whoever buys in now will be able retire in the next couple of years. Between £5 and £10 is not unrealistic.
Don't forget that, De Nora have a JV with thysenkrupp on this.
Thanks itsallbull. Ships are refuelled in ports currently? Off-shore just sounds very costly to me but time will tell of course.
I think today’s update is very significant for alkamem. Many people have been calling for an update for a long time. It’s today. The update is to the heart of the scientific and industrial community involved in electrolysis. The update must therefore be significant! Our partner De Nora is also alongside us. Exciting times for this strand of the business, hopefully.
They pipe the hydrogen through the existing gas infrastructure back to land.
Great RNS. So this presentation is today.
"he presentation will provide an update on membrane performance, scale up, and use cases within the Alkaline Water Electrolyser industry".
So by tomorrow we should know how much we will be scaling up, which will include orders. This is significant news. Great time to buy in. Supplying Germany will be huge.
Southerhay, Offshore generation would be used for shipping and possibly oil rigs. Ships can then be totally autonomous without having to refuel. Onshore generation would be of no use to ships.
Yes that correct I was dictating rather than typing and pressed send too quickly!
We've all grown old here Risky. You had it right the first time, bare fruit suggests fruit undressed ;)
Bananaman, exactly. I'm glad you're getting up to speed:-)
Apologies if my question is naive, But what is the significance of off-shore generation ? Why couldn’t It be on-shore next to the sea ? We have disused nuclear plants next to the sea with infrastructure already in place to either export the hydrogen produced or alternatively export generated electricity produced from Fuel cells using the green hydrogen. Clearly the electrolysis process will require will require electricity to produce the green hydrogen but again, green power can be delivered to the on-shore site. Cheers
Sorry not badgers. Can’t see a thing this morning it is age supposed to be bashers??
And at 1410 its 'novel anion exchange membranes as enabler for high performance water electrolysis'
AFC following De Nora and followed by a further relevant presentation is very interesting. It appears that the market for seawater electrolysers and offshore hydrogen generation is waking up.
Bare sorry
Whatever slant the badgers put on this I see today as good traction which will bear fruit
Have you just woken up mate?
Will be interesting to see if the SP rises as the presentations proceed today.