Register
Login:
Share:
Email Facebook Twitter




BLNX Share Chat - RSS Feed

Blinkx Share Chat (BLNX)



Share Price: 30.75Bid: 30.75Ask: 31.25Change: -0.75 (-2.38%)Faller - Blinkx
Spread: 0.50Spread as %: 1.63%Open: 31.50High: 31.75Low: 30.75Yesterday’s Close: 31.50


Share Discussion for Blinkx (BLNX)


Thread ViewThread View
Please Login or Register to post messages
Posts per page:


Premium Membership
gdog
Posts: 8,218
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:26.50
View Thread (2)
RE: Gdog
21 Dec '14
Sarge,

I can’t imagine why, but I feel you’re being less than sincere in the below post.

Shocking, I know.
 
drshaggy
Posts: 483
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:26.50
View Thread (8)
RE: Becky
21 Dec '14
BTW, gdog,

Shouldn't it be "know-all"?

(ie: in the unbastardised version of the English language):

http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/know-all
Sargee
Posts: 99
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:26.50
View Thread (2)
Gdog
21 Dec '14
Not at all ,but if the cap fits wear it .Any way you and your family have a great Christmas and a Happy and Prosperous New Year from across the pond lol.
Bmac
Posts: 407
Observation
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:26.50
Content is King...
21 Dec '14
Extract from the Columbia Business Times sketch….

>dKarma also produces high-quality content, including shows for YouTube.
“That’s where the next generation is getting their content,” Campbell says<…..> “Creating content will be a huge part of our future. We believe that the more we control content, the more we control the growth of the company, and the more relevant we are to our advertisers and audiences.”<..…

How right he is. Looking forward, premium content will be the driving attraction for commanding the higher premium value Ad revenues. Premium content will be soo important, exclusively ‘owned’ quality content however is the crème-de-la creme.

Music to my ears. Bmac.
gdog
Posts: 8,218
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:26.50
View Thread (8)
RE: Becky
21 Dec '14
BTW, Becky,

Isn't "know all" proper, not "know it all"?
gdog
Posts: 8,218
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:26.50
View Thread (8)
RE: Becky
21 Dec '14
Words matter. At least to me. So does the English language, in particular the bastardized version we use. Note proper spelling of "bastardize".

That being said, I realize I am marginally competent (compared to a number of my contemporaries) at all things relating to the English language, but not for lack of trying. Numbers are more my thing.

One of my "contemporaries" follows this board, and calls sheet on me all the time. In particular my ex-business partner. FU, Warty.
Becky
Posts: 1,726
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:26.50
View Thread (8)
RE: Becky
21 Dec '14
Oh dam* - just realised I'm being a know it all - tho generally I do try and keep my grammar nazism under wraps!
Becky
Posts: 1,726
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:26.50
View Thread (8)
RE: Becky
21 Dec '14
Definitely should have been whom. I was slightly startled, given your excellent grammar, at your small error ;)
gdog
Posts: 8,218
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:26.50
View Thread (8)
Becky
21 Dec '14
Help me out here. I was trying to figure out if I should have used "whom" rather than who in the below post.

I can't decide if It's the subjective use of the word "who" or the objective use of the word. These two often confuse me. Having read what I wrote I think "whom" is probably correct. Then again, I never have claimed to "know it all", even though I've been accused of this.

What say you?
Becky
Posts: 1,726
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:26.50
View Thread (3)
RE: Joy
21 Dec '14
Certainly puzzled me Dawg ...





Sign up for Live Prices


Home  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Careers  |  Advertise with Us  |  Sitemap  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Cookies  |  Privacy


Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look. While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.