frus...why would I want to meet him..the only guy I wanted to see was OF..I just stated a fact that with all the gripe why was no outright questions asked by the person so against sle and OF..as I said if you had gone would you have been so quiet?...don't you find it strange or weird why someone on these bbs wants to meet you when you have nothing in common..maybe you don't..I have no interest in the guy or sort of posters...
back biting posts......Links I did get it right but I do see your point...The way Iv'e wrote it looks like I'm saying that you wanted to meet him (Sid)....However I was just trying to quote from Sids post which actually said that he had requested a meeting with you but you had declined and then you had tried to turn it around by saying it was he who would not meet you. All of those posts seem to have been removed that is two each from Sid and SJ and one from Links, bit strange that. Iv'e asked Admin if they could explain.
frus..get it right...I didn't say I wanted to meet him..I said I went to the presentation..I posted contents of it.. others who went posted also about it....he didn't/hasn't and Im sure if you were there with the way you post you would have asked OF some outright questions!!....as by his posts.....OF didn't get any outright questioning by anyone except his wages.....you would have thought if he did turn up he would have something to say......if you had gone would you have said nothing!!......
Is this what its come to.......If the Barryroe deal go's through it should double the sp over night...Great start to 2015. So an increase of 1p is a great start...1p for the great Barryroe, one time star asset. Is that really what its worth 1p Well I suppose if you just bought a shed load its alright but for the rest of us ? WAFGTI.
Over the christmas period by some posters look childish, can't understand why a genuine remark by B 7 should escalate into this nonsense. After all many of us must be concerned as to whether SLE will still be around on pay day so that we may all have our share......SJ comes in suggesting the 2006 fraud act should be read and understood, then states that Sid can't prove he has a holding in SLE, then questions brothers interest. Sid asks for SJ address so that he may send him a copy of his interests and arrange a meeting,,SJ declines saying once more that the fraud act should be read and understood and that he had a good working knowledge of it. Doesn't want to meet Sid as life is too short to spend time in his company. (that's nice)........Sid say's Links declined a meeting with him. Links says it's Sid who wont meet him Links says he went to presentation and had conversation with OF which confirmed to him that Sids claims of going to the presentation and of meeting OF on numerous occasions were all lies and that ..Sid is dishonest.
As an ordinary pi I suppose the only real thing of interest in that lot is the mention of the 2006 fraud act, which SJ claims to know about and have a working knowledge of. Whether this means that he is some kind of lawyer I don't know. I'm sure that if he think's this act will prevent bent take over's from within or elsewhere we would all like to here about it. As for you Sid I could see little or nothing wrong with your posts but you've been called dishonest and a liar and in addition to that you've been insulted by SJ something he specialises in....If your not you should be seen to strongly defend your honour, taking care of course not to get a ban.
Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look.
While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.