Register
Login:
Share:
Email Facebook Twitter

SXX Share Chat - RSS Feed

Sirius Minerals Share Chat (SXX)



Share Price: 10.00Bid: 9.85Ask: 10.00Change: 0.00 (0.00%)No Movement on Sirius Minerals
Spread: 0.15Spread as %: 1.52%Open: 10.50High: 10.00Low: 9.81Yesterday’s Close: 10.00


Share Discussion for Sirius Minerals (SXX)


Thread ViewThread View
Please Login or Register to post messages
Posts per page:


jurassien
Posts: 13
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:13.00
Planning docs
7 Oct '14
Minehead and Materials Handling Facility documents are now viewable on the Redcar and Cleveland Planning site.
 
jurassien
Posts: 13
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:13.00
Planning docs
7 Oct '14
Minehead and Materials Handling Facility documents are now viewable on the Redcar and Cleveland Planning site:

https://planning.redcar-cleveland.gov.uk/(S(5qexsc4sx1na5gh42n2rsfa4))/plaRecord.aspx?AppNo=R/2014/0627/FFM
borolad
Posts: 491
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:13.00
Planning Meeting
7 Oct '14
I have today contacted Helmsley with a view of obtaining the address where the meeting will be held and also the number of seats available to the public at that venue.
The good lady on the end of the line said that the date and the place for where the York Potash application will be held has not yet been determined, and to keep an eye on the website link "previous post" as it will be added during a future update.
Sailorchief
Posts: 90
Observation
Opinion:Strong Buy
Price:13.00
The Yorkshire Post...
7 Oct '14
...has a very good article on p7 of the Business Section under the heading "Mine could help feed world and our appetite for growth" by Barry Dodd CBE, Chairman of the York, North Yorkshire and East Riding LEP (Local Enterprise Partnership) singing the praises of this 'important step in the future of the region' and that 'Concealed shafts means that the mining process can take place without putting the moors above at risk...'
Tobin
Posts: 85
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:13.00
View Thread (4)
RE: Conveyer from Wilton to Teespor..
7 Oct '14
Its South Teeside.
Its bringing polyhalite, but more important its bringing good jobs.
I will leave to UK if it doesnt get passed.
borolad
Posts: 491
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:13.00
OOPS!
7 Oct '14
open the link again.
click on planning.
click on york potash
ATB borolad
borolad
Posts: 491
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:13.00
NYM update
7 Oct '14
Apologies if this link has been already post.

For any new people to this board also check the links within..

http://www.northyorkmoors.org.uk/planning/york-potash.

For any new people to this board also check the links within.
Diabolical
Posts: 48
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:13.00
View Thread (4)
RE: Conveyer from Wilton to Teespor..
7 Oct '14
GK,

thanks for putting me right on the conveyor, it's a good job someone (ie. you) reads and correctly disseminates all the information that's out there!

ATB.
GaiasKidney
Posts: 878
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:13.25
View Thread (4)
RE: Conveyer from Wilton to Teespor..
7 Oct '14
Morning Diabolical

"I cannot believe that a bridge 80 feet high (In old money) will easily get PP...."Dormanstown" bridge on the A 1058 ....I assume but don't take for granted, given previous mistakes, that this route has been considered and discounted! "

Apparently and somewhat ironically its the R&CBC who are insisting that they don't want this conveyor at low level because of flood risk. From the EIA description, alternatives, sec 3.4:

"Alternative alignments for the conveyor system
3.4.16 A total of 10 alignments for the overland conveyor were considered prior to selecting the preferred
route. Four of the 10 options considered would travel underneath existing infrastructure, whilst the
remaining six options would travel over infrastructure.
3.4.17 Consultation with RCBC identified that the Sembcorp Utility corridor has a significant flood risk (Class 3
risk). It is considered that additional tunnels (which would be required to install options one to four)
would increase flood ingress risk; such a risk was not acceptable to RCBC (in principal) and therefore
options one to four were dismissed on technical grounds."

http://www.yorkpotash.co.uk/site/assets/files/2160/port_facility_per_revision_0_section_3_full.pdf
------------------------------------------
" I hope we are not going to get "Ourselves" involved in yet another Golden Plover debacle, only this time involving something much rarer, like Avocets "

No Golden Plover, no Avocet spotted in the Lagoon or the Gut. Mr Barber* did spot some Red Breasted Merganser - mind you I'm not sure I'd want to meet one of them, I'm imagining a Rockin' Robin on steroids with a machete:

* http://www.yorkpotash.co.uk/site/assets/files/2044/appendix_9_1_bird_survey.pdf

I never saw the GP as a "debacle" more of an expedient to get both sides out of a fine mess.

http://www.historiasdecinema.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/another.jpg

ATB.

GK.
Tobin
Posts: 85
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:13.00
View Thread (2)
RE: Tunnel size
6 Oct '14
Still sounds very generous.
I am sure a more realistic tunnel will be built
4.5m-5m diameter, and that would significantly reduce spoil.
The point I was making was the approach to put in worst case scenarios may back fire.





Sign up for Live Prices


Home  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Careers  |  Advertise with Us  |  Sitemap  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Cookies  |  Privacy


Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look. While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.