Register
Login:
Share:
Email Facebook Twitter

PXS Share Chat - RSS Feed

Provexis Share Chat (PXS)



Share Price: 0.605Bid: 0.55Ask: 0.66Change: -0.02 (-3.20%)Faller - Provexis
Spread: 0.11Spread as %: 20.00%Open: 0.60High: 0.605Low: 0.60Yesterday’s Close: 0.625


Share Discussion for Provexis (PXS)


Thread ViewThread View
Please Login or Register to post messages
Posts per page:


redprince
Posts: 1,528
Observation
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.77
View Thread (2)
costs covered
1 Sep '14
Yes - that is exactly what I thought - really same as capitalising them over a period of time.so the increase in profit attributable to pxs in next interims must be the incremental increase over and above the contribution earned last time.I fear that some holders may have misinterpreted the costs at an end bit in the rns.
 
alfista
Posts: 11,978
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.77
View Thread (2)
RE: large scale costs covered?
1 Sep '14
I think you may be misunderstanding what is being said by Provexis. There was a large investment made in bringing Fruitflow powder to global scale production and logistics. they are saying that this investment has been completed, meaning they have stopped spending on it. The accounting treatment of this investment is, of course, ongoing, so there will be a charge against gross profits in future years.
Lets make a hypothetical case.
I want to make a new widget, and I invest £1m on equipment and the logistical capability to have these widgets available of the shelf to any widget buyer.
I have determined that the life of this project is 10 years.
The widgets are there, anywhere they are needed, I have spent the mill in achieving that. So my spending has finished. However, at each accounting year end, for the next ten years, I will amortise my £1 by writing down £100k from the gross profit on sales. When I have done that, I will arrive at the net profit.

Paid for? Yes.
Accounted for in a single year? No.

Hope that helps.
redprince
Posts: 1,528
Question
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.77
View Thread (2)
large scale costs covered?
1 Sep '14
Are they though?the rns said they are at an end but that does not mean we have paid all of our share yet.this needs clarification imo.too much assuming going on.
wellsite
Posts: 17
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.77
View Thread (3)
RE: One for Buck
31 Aug '14
Gixer

Multo Thanks.

brgds

W$
BoringBernie
Posts: 1,118
Answer
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.77
View Thread (5)
RE: Bern
31 Aug '14
Alf

"Did any of us see revenues coming in the Full Years?"

I certainly didn't, it was a very pleasant surprise. I was just throwing numbers out which would make me happy and they might be better or worse than that. Just think it's a bit early and unrealistic to talk about break-even this FY. If it happens, great, it'd be a nice bonus but if not, its by no means the end of the world. If net cash outflow for this FY was 150k that'd mean the cash pile would last till 2017 rather than 2016.

BB

Still a little shell shocked here. Bad day at the office but as always, there are plusses and minuses.
gixer
Posts: 642
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.77
View Thread (3)
RE: One for Buck
31 Aug '14
wellsite, Polar Pharma (Freestream) seems to share your enthusiasm about Duttaroys findings and put out a press release.

http://www.epressi.com/tiedotteet/ruoka-ja-elintarvikkeet/tutkimus-tomaattiuutteella-on-vaikutusta-myos-verenpaineeseen.html
Blizzard
Posts: 121
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.77
View Thread (7)
RE: fWIW
31 Aug '14
Given CC has a 26% global share do you think non-exclusivity would prevent them from re-visiting FF given their potential commercial gain - even based on Sirco's niche and expanding track record??

Also, CC is experiencing slowing global sales and criticism for their soft drinks offer.

Would not discount the possibility completely or a buy-out of Sirco.

But, if we do not see a commitment in the next 12 months, I would also question the likelihood
wellsite
Posts: 17
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.77
View Thread (3)
RE: one for buck
31 Aug '14
Pump

I don't disagree with your sentiment. However, i would like to hear from Buck when he plans to investigate the anecdotes. I will give him a call later in the week and report back.

W$
Blizzard
Posts: 121
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.77
View Thread (3)
RE: one for buck
31 Aug '14
Pump,

6/7 years with no commercially available FFII version which arrived May 2013 with only 17 FII products contributing on average only 6.17 months per product - and already the large scale up costs have been covered.

What does that imply to you for the next 12 months with in total 34 products (and more arriving) adding to the bottom line and production costs reduced from Q2 2014?

Question to you - how much do you think a global production and logistics set up would cost?
pumpky
Posts: 3,116
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.77
View Thread (3)
one for buck
31 Aug '14
Best to learn to walk before running,after 6/7years a 4k income,imho there is stillloads of time to get in here at this Sp,though some think otherwise



Share Trading BrochureRequest your Free brochures on share dealing, spread betting and CFDs

Sign up for Live Prices
Home  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Careers  |  Advertise with Us  |  Sitemap  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Cookies  |  Privacy


Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look. While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.