I would have thought that if you were going to bring out a product with ff you would have a website domain for that product and not one of the ingredients. Maybe they think any product launched in Brazil with ff would need a good consumer friendly website explaining what ff was or maybe it’s nothing at all to do with our fruitflow. I am struggling to find a free Trademark search for Brazil to see if pxs or anybody else has registered Fruitflow yet.
It’s all just guess work but I found it interesting.
In answer to your question on the blue channel. No! Only reason, if it were me doing it, is because I would not want someone else to be ahead of me, I would have some sort of ownership so to speak???????????
Morning Paccers, good hols I hope. Yes, this sort of thing has been ongoing for quite a while, we all know what we think it is about, but only the fullness of time will confirm it. I just don't see holders parting with shares at this juncture, we have seen that gradual increase in Fruitflow exposure around the globe, which is what we all want to see happening. Yes we want faster, yes we want bigger brands and yes we want more overt promotion. That has been very gradually happening, we have evolution rather than a big bang. Those who may be thinking of buying in or increasing have been stalled by this strange trading period. Update next week, hopefully more clarity.
Hopefully Gixer will, I don't like to nick research done by others. If airlines are going to get involved, the volumes (passengers x flights per day) could be substantial. That is good in itself, but added to that is the education of consumers, making them receptive to using Fruitflow daily for its obvious benefits quite apart from helping reduce DVT risks on flights.
Good news posted by Gixer over on iii. Airlines getting involved in promoting public consciousness of the benefits of Fruitflow is a key element that we have all recognised. That it has taken longer then anticipated is typical of the Fruitflow story, but arranging a consistent worldwide availability was never going to be instant.
Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look.
While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.