No investor except inside traders have information about the current income of any company. You base your buys and sells on shares on expectations of results going forward. These are partly based on the companies past and the performance of the directors and also what you think of the information of current progress. But the market has expectations of sales and profit for every set of results which are very specific and if they are a few millions above or below expectations the sp moves one way or the other. The same is true here investors will have an average expectation of £50k income for the current 6 months. If the actual figure is below it will likely cause more sells and downward pressure on the sp and if it's over £50k the opposite will happen. Im struggling to understand someone who says they have no financial targets for a company they are invested in. The only progress that really matters is progress is income.
The book the naked trader States that you could have the best product in the world . But if it's not marketed in a proper manner it will not bear fruit . Moon was totally against advertiseing etc ,you have to dig to find this bloody product ,all the news has to be dug out of the Internet by people who know how to. Ot does not matter how much positive spin you put on this ,the company (Moon) was the only lot who have done well out of this shambles. And the day traders ......NOT investors , remeber what the Main man said .... share holder value ,in the short , medium ,and long term.........I've seen none in over 5 years with my ' investment' I hope the back wheel of that guys drag bike falls out to be honest , bloody con man ,who just wanted an extention built (And got it ,thanks to us) I waiting to see what almighty **** up he does with SIS ,but the gaffer tape is holding !
I just quote facts, no percussion instrument involved. My credibility is of no concern to me, the facts are the facts whoever writes them. And yet, despite many other posters providing lots of evidence to support the company's prospects, they don't attract the same replies. I can only think it is because I have been here throughout. I never have, nor will, provide any prediction unless I am in possession of the data to work on. As no one is, I just assume that those who do are vapid wind bags. It makes no difference to my holding/adding, none whatsoever, and all should be sure they know the facts, not the unsubstantiated, blindly speculative, baseless claims that are put around as opinion on here. Search for your own facts, check the links provided, form as broad a base of knowledge as possible, then make your own decision. If my ID has any credibility, it is that I have been saying that consistently, using only ONE ID, throughout the development of Fruitflow.
Are they? Please provide proof of where I invest. And don't include this one. With a product rolling out around the whole world, more health benefits under study, consumer awareness being actively raised by over 30 brands and increasing. This one is a gem, and I will be very happy with my holding as progress takes its course. I know nothing, Moneyweek knows nothing, EconomyWatch knows nothing, the other pages of views on a quick Bing search all know nothing, Cater stands Canute like against the tide of economic data.
My assumptions are that supplements are taken to help provide nutrients etc in cases of a poor diet, in which case you would be correct. I am wondering whether ff is seen differently, ie that it's not a supplement, it could actually help avoid heart attacks etc ? In the way aspirin does, persuasion and mass advertising is needed of course.
Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look.
While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.