My credibility lies within the information in my posts Rofert - they do not (unless I put IMHO) contain factual information gleaned by provable research if you care to double check the factual information that is oublicly available on the internet. Therefore my credibility can be shown as the information is valid.
Your credibility is, IMO, not yet rateable as you have been unable to firm up the suggestions you make. I have tried my very best to discover anything yet to suggest any further dilution will take place. Of course this may be your opinion, but you need to show a little credibility in your writing style.
As for getting things right, I know you cannot be my wife - who is allowed to say that - as she is sat next to me and she has not been posting on this bulletin board. I suppose you made a guess to suggest I am an Uncle Bryn - at least in your favour you got that one right.
Face up to your fears, and you will lead a healthier and more profitable life.
You often ask why no one accepts they are hurting, I have explained my position to you on more than one occasion. Please be courteous enough to respond to my requests.
Enjoy your Sunday and if you take today as your Sabbath then may your god be with you.
You're obsessed with credibility. It's not important, so don't stay up all night worrying about it.
I would be more concerned about looking at yourself in the mirror and asking yourself "why am I spending so much time on a discussion board debating a share I have no financial interest in when there is a whole world out there that needs exploring"
Rofert - whilst I am a glass half full type in life, it appears you remain half empty. Did you take a look at the links I gave on the Happiness Institute? If you did or not, I would suggest you digest a few of the examples and it may even assist you in your somewhat pessimistic life.
Back to part 3 - Rofert, you constantly post negative comment regarding your opinion of BMR - you never clarify the comments with IMHO, IMO or such acronyms to suggest so.
Now if I wish to post positive comment, and it is not backed up with information which is in the public domain, i.e. from RNS, other media available for public viewing I would generally add an acronym.
That said, due to my age I may occasionally forget.
As for your statements you NEVER, even when I have asked you to, clarify where your information is from. WHY?
As for never posting negative - I am sure you will find I have questioned some of the RNS statements given by the company, on a regular basis. I have even questioned MA directly. If I make an error I also make it known that I have made an error.
I have no agenda, other than wishing to make some profit from the hard earned I entrusted in the company. I am quite disheartened at the current SP and the silence from the company, presently and long term.
HOWEVER - as I keep harping on about (and I did like Harpo Marx), until BMR tell us that their plans have been scuppered, or that they are no longer a going concern, then I will remain positive that the multi millions of tonnes of assets both above and below ground are worth at least double the current market capital of the company.
Now that does not put me anywhere in the black and positively deeply in the red at double current SP. So I know you want to hear people say they are hurting at their losses - of course people are, me included, though it is a paper loss at this time, and I invested money I could afford (BUT DEFINITELY DID NOT WANT TO) to lose.
So man/woman up Rofert - either put up or shut up. (evidence to back up your claims)
I usually make a point in my posts Westy, that it is my opinion only. I am not posting with any agenda, merely to assist existing shareholders. I remain optimistic, yet cautiously so, as naturally I do have my concerns over this temporary suspension, because we don't have all the facts. There would be something wrong if I didn't feel concerned. There are however, people out there who aren't invested, and who want this to fail. If they were invested, they would not wish for such a situation. Simple as that.
It is those people who should not be given the time of day Westy. Those people who aren't invested, who pop up only when the Company and shareholders are going through a tough time, in an attempt to cause panic and spread their poison, their purpose being to undermine the confidence of existing shareholders. You have to ask yourself why? Furthermore, what type of person would do such a thing?
Yes indeed. Let's see what happens, what AB can do. Nobody knows for sure, but factors point to the Company being well-placed, certainly in terms of assets, licences for those assets, and clearance to move those assets in order to improve the environment at Kabwe. Sounds good, only time will tell if it's EPL alone, EPL with a JV, or if another entity entirely is to undertake the processing.
You are saying Bryn & Eric are insinuating negative posters have sinister agenda, based on nothing and no facts to back up their statement's. You have made unequivocal statement "For shareholders, there is going to be massive dilution. There are financial irregularities, unknown damage from years of mismanagement", possible? yes I agree but defiantly not only possibility. If irregularities are found, what problems, who is responsible and what can company recover? Fear alone should not panic PI, good thing we are in suspension & hope good news comes to update us before suspension is lifted. I am sure Bryn & Eric can defend themselves, I am tried of positive or negative opinions dressed up as FACT. IMO what you said is a possibility...but if you had stated it was your opinion & only a possibility.....respect & credibility......you may not care about respect & credibility..... then I will know what you are attempting
Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look.
While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.