''I see Excite & Gulf Key's share holders have been almost wiped out completely!! Should have had Glorious leader Mr Foo in charge! Lol''
YOU WHAT??? Investors have lost bundles of hard earned in this Dog - (quote mon3y)
Not the first time on here you've posted making fun of folk losing their hard earned - is it?
Have you ever wondered why it is that there is always an empty bar stool on either side of you when you are down your Local Pub - even when the Gaff is crowded - and the bar maid always gives you a dripping wet glass? Bet you get invited to all the Parties - yeah? - Lol.
Good evening to you SpaceHoppa. I shall now comment on your comment re' mon3y's post ''Foo'' today at 21:38. Nothing at all wrong with that well aimed bulls eye post - very accurate indeed. Re' me - and your disjointed dyslexic badly typed quote at 22:13: — almost accurate - Lol. ''I topped - up (again) on this news ... this is why I am so very angry'' — Ah! Yes! That one!
You refer to the RNS announcement that I posted on here regarding ... wait for it ... wait for it The One—Point—Four—BILLION—Barrels—of—Oil—Equivelent—of—GAS that had been FOUND - on Victoria Oil and Gas's patch by DeGolyer & McNaughton in West Medvezhye. Foolishly I got suckered into 'The Abyss' once again and I 'topped up' in this steaming heap! 1,400,000,000 barrels ......... Doris .......... Book the Cruise .......... 'Cos we're gonna be RICH. Well, why not? ''Mr. Wonderful'' really did pen a tasty RNS back then ..... still does - Lol.
Oh! Yeah! The rest of your post was 'Utter C4rp' Lol. Now off you go on your gixxer - Lol.
''FooToday 21:38And the rest of the suits are the only ones that have ever made money''
Almost true, I am sure the er, shorters & nimble footed have made money. However we have the ''angry'' crew like Mr Aj, (quote 19th July 2016 ''''I ''topped - up'' (again) on this news ... this is why I am so very angry) who have lost a packet. Sad indeed !! I see Excite & Gulf Key's share holders have been almost wiped out completely!! Should have had Glorious leader Mr Foo in charge! Lol
.......in one of his Proactive Investor interviews banging on about the terrible effect of dilution and that he knew this only too well having an average of 6p equivalent. Point 1) LTHs weren't given the chance to share in that dilution which knocked a third off our value overnight. Point 2) Foo's 6p average is irrelevant and of little real concern to him as he continues to make shedloads more through salary, bonuses and royalties than he could ever lose on his shareholding.
FACT : For quite some time (some) posters on here have criticised V O G on their lack of PR — I disagree so very much with all of these posters — V O G (well, Kevin Alfred Foo - that is) — has an excellent PR machine that 'kicks-in' every single time that anyone on here posts an awkward or 'sticky' question - and / or - comment. Regular contributors of this LSE V O G board know only too well the nom de plumes of who I am referring to — yeah?
banjo [14:11] — ''this is all old news from 2014 that was put into an article by Roland Head to try and make a name for himself. He also writes for Motley Fool, need I say more!'' Doesn't matter if he - (RH) - also writes for Motley Fool, or the Outer Hebrides Sheep Herd Gazette, the FACT still remains that Foo DID receive a whopping 85% pay rise that took him from $310,00 to $573,000. Your criticism of my post was all too morbidly predictable in the way in which you responded to it. Old news? Not even two years old as yet! And it does contain many interesting FACTS.
Talking of harping, let's just remind ourselves of what the SP was at the back end of 2013. ie 46p equivalent. Nearly 2 years later and after nearly 2 years of you harping on about the wonderful achievements, SP is currently 33p. So how do you work out that anyone buying then will do OK? Shouldn't they already be doing OK after all these milestones passed. I think LTHs are entitled to have a bit of a beef without your condescending claptrap, with respect.
Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look.
While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.